Industry Convergence and its Implications for the Front End of Innovation: A Problem of Absorptive Capacity

This paper explores industry convergence and its implications for the front end of innovation. Conventional practice of idea generation and selection seems to be difficult in times of convergence, since actors face new knowledge and competencies owned in different industries. Given these particularities of industry convergence, this paper analyses decision processes at the front end of 54 R&D projects by using a mixed-method research design. Findings indicate that there are different approaches of how firms engage in innovation in industry convergence. A central implication is the need to differentiate between the market and technological side of a firm's absorptive capacity.

[1]  J ShenharAaron.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects , 2001 .

[2]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Managing through industry fusion , 1999 .

[3]  H. Sarnat,et al.  Histochemistry and immunocytochemistry of the developing ependyma and choroid plexus , 1998, Microscopy research and technique.

[4]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1989 .

[5]  Don E. Kash,et al.  Path Dependence in the Innovation of Complex Technologies , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[6]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Strategy as stretch and leverage. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[7]  C. Prahalad.  Managing discontinuities : The emerging challenges , 1998 .

[8]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[9]  W. Mitchell.  Whether and When? Probability and Timing of Incumbents' Entry into Emerging Industrial Subfields , 1989 .

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[11]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF FIRMS' STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INDUSTRY CONVERGENCE. , 2001 .

[12]  Jörg Rockenhäuser.  Digitale Konvergenz und Kompetenzenmanagement , 1999 .

[13]  Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[14]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[15]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988-1992 , 1998 .

[16]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[17]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence , 1997 .

[18]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Technological Convergence in the IT Industry: The Role of Strategic Technology Alliances and Technological Competencies , 1998 .

[19]  D. Choi,et al.  Patterns of strategy innovation , 2001 .

[20]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Asset redeployment, acquisitions and corporate strategy in declining industries , 1997 .

[21]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al.  Competence Strategies in Organizing Product Development , 2005 .

[22]  Fernando Vega-Redondo,et al.  Technological change and path dependence: a co-evolutionary model on a directed graph , 1994 .

[23]  Philipp Mayring.  Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken , 2003 .

[24]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[26]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History , 1994 .

[27]  Michael L. Katz,et al.  Remarks on the Economic Implications of Convergence , 1996 .

[28]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[30]  M. Engwall.  No project is an island: linking projects to history and context , 2003 .

[31]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[32]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[33]  A. Oliveira,et al.  A new competitive landscape , 2007 .

[34]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[35]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D , 1994 .