A collective blueprint, not a crystal ball: How expectations and participation shape long-term energy scenarios

[1]  E. Byrne,et al.  Doing things differently: Bridging community concerns and energy system modelling with a transdisciplinary approach in rural Ireland , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.

[2]  C. Kemfert,et al.  Centralized and decentral approaches to succeed the 100% energiewende in Germany in the European context – A model-based analysis of generation, network, and storage investments , 2022, Energy Policy.

[3]  Philipp Blechinger,et al.  Modelling social aspects of the energy transition: What is the current representation of social factors in energy models? , 2022 .

[4]  E. Byrne,et al.  Participatory methods in energy system modelling and planning – A review , 2021 .

[5]  G. Nemet.  Improving the crystal ball , 2021, Nature Energy.

[6]  Johan Lilliestam,et al.  Better suited or just more complex? On the fit between user needs and modeller-driven improvements of energy system models , 2021, Energy.

[7]  E. Verdolini,et al.  Comparing expert elicitation and model-based probabilistic technology cost forecasts for the energy transition , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  D. Stolten,et al.  Hybrid Hydrogen Home Storage for Decentralized Energy Autonomy , 2021 .

[9]  J. Lilliestam,et al.  Model-based policymaking or policy-based modelling? How energy models and energy policy interact , 2021, Energy Research & Social Science.

[10]  Amirhossein Fattahi,et al.  Measuring accuracy and computational capacity trade-offs in an hourly integrated energy system model , 2021 .

[11]  T. Brown,et al.  The strong effect of network resolution on electricity system models with high shares of wind and solar , 2021, Applied Energy.

[12]  L. Goke,et al.  Adequacy of time-series reduction for renewable energy systems , 2021, 2101.06221.

[13]  R. Schmidt-Scheele.  ‘Plausible’ energy scenarios?! How users of scenarios assess uncertain futures , 2020, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[14]  S. Eloneva,et al.  Renovation realities: Actors, institutional work and the struggle to transform Finnish energy policy , 2020, Energy Research & Social Science.

[15]  G. Andresen,et al.  Modeling all alternative solutions for highly renewable energy systems , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Charlotte Senkpiel,et al.  Integrating Methods and Empirical Findings from Social and Behavioural Sciences into Energy System Models—Motivation and Possible Approaches , 2020, Energies.

[17]  Alevgul H. Sorman,et al.  The desirability of transitions in demand: Incorporating behavioural and societal transformations into energy modelling , 2020, Energy Research & Social Science.

[18]  R. Galvin,et al.  The Green New Deal in the United States: What it is and how to pay for it , 2020 .

[19]  Emanuela Colombo,et al.  Policy Decision Support for Renewables Deployment through Spatially Explicit Practically Optimal Alternatives , 2020 .

[20]  T. Tröndle.  Supply-side options to reduce land requirements of fully renewable electricity in Europe , 2020, PloS one.

[21]  E. Laes,et al.  What do energy modellers know? An ethnography of epistemic values and knowledge models , 2020, Energy Research & Social Science.

[22]  Isabell Braunger,et al.  How Incumbent Cultural and Cognitive Path Dependencies Constrain the ‘Scenario Cone’: Reliance on Carbon Dioxide Removal due to Techno-bias , 2020 .

[23]  Pao-Yu Oei,et al.  Lessons from Modeling 100% Renewable Scenarios Using GENeSYS-MOD , 2020 .

[24]  L. Goke.  A graph-based formulation for modeling macro-energy systems , 2020, 2004.10184.

[25]  M. Stauffacher,et al.  How the public imagines the energy future: Exploring and clustering non-experts’ techno-economic expectations towards the future energy system , 2020, PloS one.

[26]  David Pisinger,et al.  Finding a Portfolio of Near-Optimal Aggregated Solutions to Capacity Expansion Energy System Models , 2020, SN Operations Research Forum.

[27]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them , 2020 .

[28]  Stefan C. Aykut.  Reassembling Energy Policy , 2019 .

[29]  Tobias Junne,et al.  How to assess the quality and transparency of energy scenarios: Results of a case study , 2019, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[30]  J. Weyant,et al.  Macro-Energy Systems: Toward a New Discipline , 2019, Joule.

[31]  C. Breyer,et al.  Reply to ‘Bias in energy system models with uniform cost of capital assumption’ , 2019, Nature Communications.

[32]  Fabian Neumann,et al.  The Near-Optimal Feasible Space of a Renewable Power System Model , 2019, Electric Power Systems Research.

[33]  R. Shiller,et al.  Narrative economics: how stories go viral and drive major economic events , 2021, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[34]  R. Kannan,et al.  Multi-model comparison of Swiss decarbonization scenarios , 2019, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics.

[35]  S. Vögele,et al.  Economic Disruptions in Long-Term Energy Scenarios – Implications for Designing Energy Policy , 2019, Energy.

[36]  Nathan Kapoor,et al.  "Who Has Seen the Wind": Imagining Wind Power for the Generation of Electricity in Victorian Britain , 2019, Technology and culture.

[37]  D. Stolten,et al.  Cost Uncertainties in Energy System Optimization Models: A Quadratic Programming Approach for Avoiding Penny Switching Effects , 2019, Energies.

[38]  C. Breyer,et al.  Status and perspectives on 100% renewable energy systems , 2019, Energy.

[39]  Mario Kendziorski,et al.  Illustrating the Benefits of Openness: A Large-Scale Spatial Economic Dispatch Model Using the Julia Language , 2019, Energies.

[40]  J. Stephens.  Energy Democracy: Redistributing Power to the People Through Renewable Transformation , 2019, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development.

[41]  Janet Stephenson,et al.  The politics of energy scenarios: Are International Energy Agency and other conservative projections hampering the renewable energy transition? , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[42]  Peter M. Haugan,et al.  A review of modelling tools for energy and electricity systems with large shares of variable renewables , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[43]  Stefan Pfenninger,et al.  Calliope: a multi-scale energy systems modelling framework , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[44]  Maxime Quijoux.  Travail , 2018, Dictionnaire d'économie politique.

[45]  Lukas Braunreiter,et al.  Of sailors and divers: How researchers use energy scenarios , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[46]  Simon Hilpert,et al.  A qualitative evaluation approach for energy system modelling frameworks , 2018 .

[47]  Robbie Morrison,et al.  Energy system modeling: Public transparency, scientific reproducibility, and open development , 2018 .

[48]  Antti Silvast,et al.  Energy, economics, and performativity: Reviewing theoretical advances in social studies of markets and energy , 2017 .

[49]  Gregory Jackson.  A Future for Capitalism , 2017, European Journal of Sociology.

[50]  K. Blok,et al.  Response to ‘Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems’ , 2017, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[51]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World , 2017 .

[52]  C. Smith.  Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics , 2017 .

[53]  K. Janda,et al.  Using stories, narratives, and storytelling in energy and climate change research , 2017 .

[54]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Energy scenarios: the value and limits of scenario analysis , 2017 .

[55]  D. Stern.  How accurate are energy intensity projections? , 2017, Climatic Change.

[56]  Matthew T. Huber,et al.  “We Can't Be Dependent on Anybody”: The rhetoric of “Energy Independence” and the legitimation of fracking in Pennsylvania , 2017 .

[57]  Iain Staffell,et al.  The importance of open data and software: Is energy research lagging behind? , 2017 .

[58]  Dejan Ivezić,et al.  Exploring scenarios for more sustainable heating: The case of Niš, Serbia , 2016 .

[59]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition? , 2016 .

[60]  Paul Upham,et al.  Participatory energy scenario development as dramatic scripting: A structural narrative analysis , 2016 .

[61]  C. Breyer,et al.  The Projections for the Future and Quality in the Past of the World Energy Outlook for Solar PV and Other Renewable Energy Technologies , 2015 .

[62]  Ellen B. Stechel,et al.  Narrative futures and the governance of energy transitions , 2015 .

[63]  Dominik Möst,et al.  Does political and social feasibility matter in energy scenarios , 2015 .

[64]  Kathryn B. Janda,et al.  Telling tales: using stories to remake energy policy , 2015 .

[65]  Paul Upham,et al.  Original research articleEnergy model, boundary object and societal lens: 35 years of the MARKAL model in the UK , 2014 .

[66]  Frank Nevens,et al.  A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom , 2014 .

[67]  Phillip Y. Lipscy,et al.  The Politics of Energy , 2013 .

[68]  Jens Beckert.  Imagined futures: fictional expectations in the economy , 2013 .

[69]  J. Bockris.  The hydrogen economy: Its history , 2013 .

[70]  Brigitte Knopf,et al.  Ambitious mitigation scenarios for Germany: A participatory approach , 2012 .

[71]  Christian von Hirschhausen,et al.  A Large-Scale Spatial Optimization Model of the European Electricity Market , 2012 .

[72]  A. Grunwald.  Energy futures: Diversity and the need for assessment , 2011 .

[73]  Eduardo A. Febles.  The Anarchic Commune as World's Fair in Émile Zola's Travail , 2008 .

[74]  E. Martinot,et al.  Renewable Energy Futures: Targets, Scenarios, and Pathways , 2007 .

[75]  Kenneth Bernard Karlsson,et al.  Energy Scenarios: A Review of Methods, Uses and Suggestions for Improvement , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[76]  N. Duić,et al.  Two energy system analysis models: A comparison of methodologies and results , 2007 .

[77]  M. Cetron,et al.  Biodiesel production : a preliminary study from Jatropha Curcas , 2013 .

[78]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[79]  Jonathan G. Koomey,et al.  WHAT CAN HISTORY TEACH US? A Retrospective Examination of Long-Term Energy Forecasts for the United States* , 2002 .

[80]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Limits to the value of external costs , 1997 .

[81]  T. Breyfogle.  “Memory and Imagination in Augustine's Confessions” , 1994 .

[82]  C. Corrin.  Women and socialism , 1990 .

[83]  Wolf Häfele,et al.  A technical appraisal of the IIASA energy scenarios? A rebuttal , 1986 .

[84]  Atle Midttun,et al.  Negotiating energy futures. The politics of energy forecasting , 1986 .

[85]  Lee Clarke,et al.  The Origins of Nuclear Power: A Case of Institutional Conflict , 1985 .

[86]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Technical analysis of IIASA energy scenarios , 1984, Nature.

[87]  Brian Wynne,et al.  The institutional context of science, models, and policy: The IIASA energy study , 1984 .

[88]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[89]  R Eden,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2020 , 1981, World Energy Outlook.

[90]  Wolf Häfele,et al.  Energy in a Finite World: Paths to a Sustainable Future (Volume 1) , 1981 .

[91]  A L Hammond,et al.  "Soft technology" energy debate: limits to growth revisited? , 1977, Science.

[92]  A. Lovins.  Energy strategy , 1976, Nature.

[93]  B Sørensen,et al.  Energy and Resources: A plan is outlined according to which solar and wind energy would supply Denmark's needs by the year 2050. , 1975, Science.

[94]  W. Armytage.  J. A. Etzler, an American Utopist , 1956 .

[95]  C. Breyer,et al.  Review on 100% Renewable Energy System Analyses—A Bibliometric Perspective , 2022, IEEE Access.

[96]  C. Kemfert,et al.  100 % renewable energy for Germany : coordinated expansion planning needed , 2021 .

[97]  Shiyan Chang,et al.  An agent-based model of household energy consumption , 2020 .

[98]  Pao-Yu Oei,et al.  Erneuerbare Energien als Schlüssel für das Erreichen der Klimaschutzziele im Stromsektor: Studie im Auftrag der Bundestagsfraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen , 2019 .

[99]  A. Grunwald.  Das Akzeptanzproblem als Folge nicht adäquater Systemgrenzen in der technischen Entwicklung und Planung , 2019, Akzeptanz und politische Partizipation in der Energietransformation.

[100]  M. Fischedick,et al.  Pfadabhängigkeiten in der Energiewende : das Beispiel Mobilität , 2017 .

[101]  Armin Grunwald,et al.  Consulting with energy scenarios : Requirements for scientific policy advice, Position Paper [of the Academies' Project “Energy Systems of the Future”] , 2016 .

[102]  Mary C Zwart.  The Energy Model. , 2016, Midwifery today with international midwife.

[103]  Timur Ergen.  Große Hoffnungen und brüchige Koalitionen: Industrie, Politik und die schwierige Durchsetzung der Photovoltaik , 2015 .

[104]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[105]  Olav Hohmeyer,et al.  Trends toward 100% renewable electricity supply in Germany and Europe: a paradigm shift in energy policies , 2015 .

[106]  Werner Abelshauser.  Der Traum von der umweltverträglichen Energie und seine schwierige Verwirklichung , 2014, Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte.

[107]  Woodrow W. Clark,et al.  The Political-Economics of the Green Industrial Revolution: Renewable Energy as the Key to National Sustainable Communities , 2013 .

[108]  J. Verne.  The mysterious island. , 2013, Radiologic technology.

[109]  Martin Jänicke,et al.  A Third Industrial Revolution? Solutions to the Crisis of Resource-Intensive Growth , 2009 .

[110]  D. Mackenzie.  An engine, not a camera , 2006 .

[111]  Jorgen S. Norgard,et al.  Models of energy saving systems: the battlefield of environmental planning , 2000 .

[112]  A. Voss,et al.  Energiewende? : Analysen, Fragen und Anmerkungen zu dem vom ÖKO-Institut vorgelegten "Alternativ-Bericht" , 1980 .

[113]  F. Krause,et al.  Energie-Wende : Wachstum und Wohlstand ohne Erdöl und Uran : ein Alternativ-Bericht des Öko-Instituts/Freiburg , 1980 .

[114]  W. Jevons,et al.  On the Coal Question , 1873, Nature.