Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model ecosystem services: A systematic review

Summary SWAT, a watershed modeling tool has been proposed to help quantify ecosystem services. The concept of ecosystem services incorporates the collective benefits natural systems provide primarily to human beings. It is becoming increasingly important to track the impact that human activities have on the environment in order to determine its resilience and sustainability. The objectives of this paper are to provide an overview of efforts using SWAT to quantify ecosystem services, to determine the model’s capability examining various types of services, and to describe the approach used by various researchers. A literature review was conducted to identify studies in which SWAT was explicitly used for quantifying ecosystem services in terms of provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural aspects. A total of 44 peer reviewed publications were identified. Most of these used SWAT to quantify provisioning services (34%), regulating services (27%), or a combination of both (25%). While studies using SWAT for evaluating ecosystem services are limited (approximately 1% of SWAT’s peered review publications), and usage (vs. potential) of services by beneficiaries is a current model limitation, the available literature sets the stage for the continuous development and potential of SWAT as a methodological framework for quantifying ecosystem services to assist in decision-making.

[1]  Laura M. Norman,et al.  Framing scenarios of binational water policy with a tool to visualize, quantify and valuate changes in ecosystem services , 2013 .

[2]  I. Chaubey,et al.  A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services , 2013 .

[3]  Deg-Hyo Bae,et al.  Possible change in Korean streamflow seasonality based on multi‐model climate projections , 2013 .

[4]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation , 2012 .

[5]  Henrique Alves,et al.  Gains from trans-boundary water quality management in linked catchment and coastal socio-ecological systems: A case study for the Minho region , 2013 .

[6]  E. Oteros‐Rozas,et al.  Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level , 2013 .

[7]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  A blue/green water‐based accounting framework for assessment of water security , 2013 .

[8]  Tracy A. Farrell,et al.  Paying the forest for electricity: a modelling framework to market forest conservation as payment for ecosystem services benefiting hydropower generation , 2011, Environmental Conservation.

[9]  Fred F. Hattermann,et al.  Vulnerability of rice production in the Inner Niger Delta to water resources management under climate variability and change , 2013 .

[10]  T. Plieninger,et al.  An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators , 2013 .

[11]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services , 2006 .

[12]  Christopher L. Lant,et al.  The evolution and empirical estimation of ecological-economic production possibilities frontiers , 2013 .

[13]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[14]  Felix Mtalo,et al.  SWAT model application in a data scarce tropical complex catchment in Tanzania , 2008 .

[15]  Valentina Krysanova,et al.  Integrated assessment of cropland soil carbon sensitivity to recent and future climate in the Elbe River basin , 2008 .

[16]  R. Lasco,et al.  Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to Assess Material Transfer in the Layawan Watershed, Mindanao, Philippines and Its Implications on Payment for Ecosystem Services , 2013 .

[17]  Martin Volk,et al.  Land use change in a 200‐year period and its effect on blue and green water flow in two Slovenian Mediterranean catchments—lessons for the future , 2013 .

[18]  S. Wani,et al.  Opportunities to Build Groundwater Resilience in the Semi-Arid Tropics. , 2012, Ground water.

[19]  Seyoum Y. Gebremariam,et al.  A comprehensive approach to evaluating watershed models for predicting river flow regimes critical to downstream ecosystem services , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Green Water Credits – exploring its potential to enhance ecosystem services by reducing soil erosion in the Upper Tana basin, Kenya , 2014 .

[21]  S. S. Zanetti,et al.  Application of the SWAT hydrologic model to a tropical watershed at Brazil , 2015 .

[22]  B. Voigt,et al.  From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments , 2014 .

[23]  T. Barnett,et al.  Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions , 2005, Nature.

[24]  James W. Jones,et al.  The DSSAT cropping system model , 2003 .

[25]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Assessing SWAT's performance in the Kaskaskia River watershed as influenced by the number of calibration stations used , 2014 .

[26]  Richard Coe,et al.  CLIMATE- AND LAND USE-INDUCED RISKS TO WATERSHED SERVICES IN THE NYANDO RIVER BASIN, KENYA , 2011, Experimental Agriculture.

[27]  Naveed Akhtar,et al.  Diversity and use of ethno-medicinal plants in the region of Swat, North Pakistan , 2013, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine.

[28]  Karim C. Abbaspour,et al.  Modelling water provision as an ecosystem service in a large East African river basin , 2011 .

[29]  Elaine Stebler,et al.  Calibration of SWAT model for woody plant encroachment using paired experimental watershed data , 2015 .

[30]  Anantha Kumar Duraiappah,et al.  Tradeoffs, synergies and traps among ecosystem services in the Lake Victoria basin of East Africa , 2009 .

[31]  Arthur J. Gold,et al.  Modeling the Production of Multiple Ecosystem Services from Agricultural and Forest Landscapes in Rhode Island , 2013, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[32]  David March,et al.  Steps toward a shared governance response for achieving Good Environmental Status in the Mediterranean Sea , 2014 .

[33]  Gloria Salmoral,et al.  Drivers influencing streamflow changes in the Upper Turia basin, Spain. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Les Kaufman,et al.  The Multiscale Integrated Model of Ecosystem Services (MIMES): Simulating the interactions of coupled human and natural systems , 2015 .

[35]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[36]  Min Fan,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Hydrological Provision Ecosystem Services for Watershed Conservation Planning of Water Resources , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[37]  Steven Broekx,et al.  Coupling a hydrological water quality model and an economic optimization model to set up a cost-effective emission reduction scenario for nitrogen , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  Y. E. Woyessa,et al.  Impact of rainwater harvesting on water resources of the modder river basin, central region of South Africa , 2013 .

[39]  Mark Mulligan,et al.  Uncertainty is the Key Challenge for Agricultural Water Resources Management under Climate Change in the BRICS , 2015 .

[40]  Kari L Vigerstol,et al.  A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[41]  Amy S. Collick,et al.  Applicability of models to predict phosphorus losses in drained fields: a review. , 2015, Journal of environmental quality.

[42]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services , 2013 .

[43]  Xiangming Xiao,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: WATER FLOW REGULATION AND HYDROELECTRIC POWER PRODUCTION , 2000 .

[44]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[45]  Gilbert T. Bernhardt,et al.  A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model , 1993 .

[46]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Mapping the Economic Costs and Benefits of Conservation , 2006, PLoS biology.

[47]  P. Gleick.  Water and Conflict: Fresh Water Resources and International Security , 1993 .

[48]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[49]  John M. Antle,et al.  Can payments for ecosystem services secure the water tower of Tibet , 2008 .

[50]  E. Cantoral-Uriza,et al.  Assessment of Water Supply as an Ecosystem Service in a Rural-Urban Watershed in Southwestern Mexico City , 2012, Environmental Management.

[51]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[52]  C. Angela,et al.  Hydrological evaluation of a peri-urban stream and its impact on ecosystem services potential , 2015 .

[53]  Louise Willemen,et al.  Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review , 2012 .

[54]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Conservation Practice Modeling Guide for SWAT and APEX , 2011 .

[55]  Isabel van de Sand,et al.  Can Payments for Ecosystem Services Contribute to Adaptation to Climate Change? Insights from a Watershed in Kenya , 2014, Ecology and Society.

[56]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment , 2014, PloS one.

[57]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Applications of the SWAT Model Special Section: Overview and Insights. , 2014, Journal of environmental quality.

[58]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Min Fan,et al.  Simulation of watershed hydrology and stream water quality under land use and climate change scenarios in Teshio River watershed, northern Japan , 2015 .

[60]  Harvey Alexander.  Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems: Edited by Gretchen C. Daily Island Press, 1997, $24.95, 392 pages , 1999 .

[61]  Mette Termansen,et al.  Underlying and proximate driving causes of land use change in district Swat, Pakistan , 2013 .

[62]  J. Arnold,et al.  Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management , 2005 .

[63]  Marcela Quintero,et al.  For services rendered? Modeling hydrology and livelihoods in Andean payments for environmental services schemes , 2009 .

[64]  Janko Urbanc,et al.  Spatial variation of crop rotations and their impacts on provisioning ecosystem services on the river Drava alluvial plain , 2015 .

[65]  J. Arnold,et al.  SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling , 2005 .

[66]  Laura M. Norman,et al.  Mapping socio-environmentally vulnerable populations access and exposure to ecosystem services at the U.S.–Mexico borderlands , 2012 .

[67]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[68]  Christopher L. Lant,et al.  Using GIS-Based Ecological-Economic Modeling to Evaluate Policies Affecting Agricultural Watersheds , 2005 .

[69]  M. White,et al.  Advances in water resources assessment with SWAT—an overview , 2015 .

[70]  Charles R. Lane,et al.  Hydrologic connectivity between geographically isolated wetlands and surface water systems: A review of select modeling methods , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[71]  E. G. Bekele,et al.  Multiobjective management of ecosystem services by integrative watershed modeling and evolutionary algorithms , 2005 .

[72]  J. Hanspach,et al.  Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research , 2013 .

[73]  Thanapon Piman,et al.  Assessment of Flow Changes from Hydropower Development and Operations in Sekong, Sesan, and Srepok Rivers of the Mekong Basin , 2013 .

[74]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation , 2013 .

[75]  William H. Blake,et al.  Evaluating the importance of surface soil contributions to reservoir sediment in alpine environments: a combined modelling and fingerprinting approach in the Posets-Maladeta Natural Park , 2014 .

[76]  K. Gaston,et al.  Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities , 2009 .

[77]  Martin Volk,et al.  Optimization-based trade-off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[78]  Silvia Secchi,et al.  Privatizing Ecosystem Services: Water Quality Effects from a Carbon Market , 2007 .

[79]  宋晓谕 Song Xiaoyu,et al.  Spatial targeting of payments for ecosystem services Based on SWAT Model and cost-benefit analysis , 2012 .

[80]  J M Gathenya,et al.  A modeling approach to evaluate the impact of conservation practices on water and sediment yield in Sasumua Watershed, Kenya , 2015, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[81]  M. Zeitoun,et al.  Hydro-hegemony – a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts , 2006 .

[82]  Beth Cullen,et al.  A socio-hydrological approach for incorporating gender into biophysical models and implications for water resources research , 2015 .