Tutorial review: Simultaneous measurement of particle size and particle charge

Abstract Simultaneous measurement of particle size and charge usually involves a conventional method for the former, which is compatible with a chosen method for the latter. Measurements of charge are of two types: static, in which the absolute charge is measured; and dynamic, in which the electrical mobility is measured. Static measurements rely on charge transfer or induction using a complete or incomplete Faraday cage. They tend to be limited to particles of high charge or aerosols that have unipolar charge. Dynamic methods usually involve subjecting the aerosol to a high electric field, measuring or inferring the velocity that the particle reaches and relating this to the electrical mobility. The charge on small particles can easily be measured in this way, but the drawback so far as population measurements are concerned is that the requirement for details of both size and charge necessitates a large number of “bins” and, therefore, a long sampling time. Means of coping with the problems that this causes are discussed, and the method in which a particle is made to respond to a temporally varying electric field is also described. No method is without complications or practical problems, and the need for further work on the subject is apparent.

[1]  J. Gentry,et al.  Unipolar charging of ultrafine aerosols , 1986 .

[2]  Anatol Jaworek,et al.  A method for aerosol particle charge measurements , 1989 .

[3]  E. Davis,et al.  Light-scattering and aerodynamic size measurements for homogeneous and inhomogeneous microspheres , 1985 .

[4]  Measurements of charge imparted to fine particles by a corona discharge , 1957, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Part I: Communication and Electronics.

[5]  F. S. Brackett,et al.  An Electrical Method for Investigating the Nature and Behavior of Small, Airborne, Charged Particles , 1951 .

[6]  S. Arnold,et al.  An absolute method for aerosol particle mass and charge measurement , 1983 .

[7]  D. Hochrainer,et al.  An inertial spectrometer for aerosol particles , 1979 .

[8]  Malay K. Mazumder,et al.  Measurement of particle size and electrostatic charge distributions on toners using E-SPART analyzer , 1991 .

[9]  Measurement of Aerosol Concentration as a Function of Size and Charge , 1984 .

[10]  D. Hochrainer Measurement methods for electric charges on aerosols. , 1985, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  D. Wake,et al.  Apparatus for measurement of the electrical mobility of aerosol particles: computer control and data analysis , 1991 .

[12]  T. Gillespie,et al.  AN INSTRUMENT FOR DETERMINING THE ELECTRIC CHARGE DISTRIBUTION IN AEROSOLS , 1952 .

[13]  M. K. Testerman,et al.  SPART analyzer: its application to aerodynamic size distribution measurement , 1979 .

[14]  C. N. Davies,et al.  The Mechanics of Aerosols , 1964 .

[15]  R. Flagan,et al.  Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer , 1990 .

[16]  Particle sizing by electrical single particle aerodynamic relaxation time analyzer , 1981 .

[17]  W. John,et al.  Uniform electrical charging of monodisperse aerosols , 1977 .

[18]  W. B. Johnston,et al.  Static electrification of airborne asbestos: a study of its causes, assessment and effects on deposition in the lungs of rats. , 1981, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[19]  W. John,et al.  The measurement of the charge distribution on monodisperse aerosols , 1974 .

[20]  M. A. Hemingway,et al.  A miniature electret-based device for measuring the electrical mobility of aerosols , 1995 .

[21]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Particle sizing in the electrodynamic balance , 1986 .

[22]  J. Mullins,et al.  Aerosol size distribution from ion mobility , 1962 .

[23]  D. K. Hutchins,et al.  Simultaneous determination of the diffusion coefficient and electrical mobility of single aerosol particles , 1984 .

[24]  K. Okuyama,et al.  Bipolar Charging of Ultrafine Aerosol Particles , 1983 .

[25]  T. H. Laby,et al.  The electronic charge , 1941, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[26]  K. Okuyama,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC CHARGE OF AEROSOL PARTICLES GENERATED BY VARIOUS METHODS , 1981 .

[27]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  Effect of Particle Electrostatic Charge on Filtration by Fibrous Filters , 1965 .

[28]  E. James Davis,et al.  A History of Single Aerosol Particle Levitation , 1997 .

[29]  Mathematical model of non-contact measurements of charges while moving , 1984 .

[30]  J. Hughes,et al.  Particle Charging and Absolute Measurement of Charge to Mass Ratio , 1984, IEEE transactions on industry applications.

[31]  J. Hansen,et al.  A Dust Electricity Analyzer , 1950 .

[32]  A. Johnston A semi-automatic method for the assessment of electric charge carried by airborne dust , 1983 .

[33]  P. Poluektov,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of aerosol particle charge and size distributions , 1991 .

[34]  J. Vincent,et al.  Electrical Charge Characteristics of Dry Aerosols Produced by a Number of Laboratory Mechanical Dispensers , 1987 .

[35]  P. V. Wells,et al.  AN OSCILLATION METHOD FOR MEASURING THE SIZE OF ULTRAMICROSCOPIC PARTICLES.1 , 1919 .

[36]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Asymmetric Instrument Response Resulting from Mixing Effects in Accelerated DMA-CPC Measurements , 1995 .

[37]  K. Coakley,et al.  Novel method to classify aerosol particles according to their mass-to-charge ratio—Aerosol particle mass analyser , 1996 .

[38]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  Aerosol classification by electric mobility: apparatus, theory, and applications , 1975 .

[39]  A. Bailey,et al.  The measurement of charge on microscopic particles , 1979 .

[40]  Gurumurthy Ramachandran,et al.  Inversion techniques for personal cascade impactor data , 1996 .

[41]  Detlef Hummes,et al.  Experimental Comparison of Four Differential Mobility Analyzers for Nanometer Aerosol Measurements , 1996 .

[42]  G. Langer,et al.  Development of a Simple, High‐Resolution Mobility Analyzer for Small, Charged Particles , 1962 .