Effect of pollution control on corporate financial performance in a transition economy

This study analyzes the effect of pollution control on corporate financial performance in a transition economy. In particular, it assesses whether better pollution control, as measured by lower air pollutant emissions, improves or undermines financial success, as captured by accounting-based measures of financial performance, e.g. profitability. For this assessment, this study analyzes the effect of air pollution control using a panel of Czech firms for the years 1996–1998. The analytical results indicate that better pollution control neither improves nor undermines financial success. These results provide no support for the hypothesis that pollution prevention, generated by improved production processes, led to lower costs, and thus, greater profitability. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

[1]  Greg Filbeck,et al.  The Relationship between the Environmental and Financial Performance of Public Utilities , 2004 .

[2]  R. Bluffstone.  Are the costs of pollution abatement lower in Central and Eastern Europe? Evidence from Lithuania , 1999, Environment and Development Economics.

[3]  J. McGuire,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance , 1988 .

[4]  Simeon Djankov.  Ownership Structure and Enterprise Restructuring in Six Newly Independent States , 1999 .

[5]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[6]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Does the Market Value Environmental Performance? , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[7]  S. Claessens,et al.  Privatization and Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence and Policy Options , 1997 .

[8]  Paul Lanoie,et al.  The Market Response to Environmental Incidents in Canada: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[9]  Civil Litigation, Access to Government-Held Information, and Coordination of Public and Private Enforcement in the Czech Republic , 1998 .

[10]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? : Understanding participation in EPA's 33/50 program , 1996 .

[11]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? , 1995 .

[12]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  An Experiment in Voluntary Environmental Regulation: Participation in EPA's 33/50 Program , 1995 .

[13]  R. Klassen,et al.  The impact of environmental management on firm performance , 1996 .

[14]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  DOES IT PAY TO BE GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMISSION REDUCTION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[15]  R. Filer,et al.  Consumers’ Opinion of Inflation Bias Due to Quality Improvements , 2001, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[16]  Lubomír Lízal,et al.  Effects of ownership and financial performance on corporate environmental performance , 2006 .

[17]  Jon Kessler,et al.  Smart Screened Investments , 1998 .

[18]  Stijn Claessens,et al.  Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance in the Czech Republic , 1999 .

[19]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  On corporate governance: A study of proxy contests , 1983 .

[20]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[21]  Roman Frydman,et al.  When Does Privatization Work? The Impact of Private Ownership on Corporate Performance in the Transition Economies , 1999 .

[22]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms , 1999 .

[23]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions , 1997 .

[24]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Toxics Release Information: A Policy Tool for Environmental Protection , 1998 .

[25]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .