Cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mike Paulden | Murray Krahn | B. Pham | P. Bedard | M. Trudeau | M. Paulden | J. Franek | M. Krahn | Jacob Franek | Ba’ Pham | Philippe L. Bedard | Maureen E. Trudeau
[1] D. Hayes,et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[2] Gary H Lyman,et al. Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer. , 2005, The American journal of managed care.
[3] J. Bryan. S31 Toward a More Rational Selection of Tailored AdjuvantTherapy: Data from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project , 2005 .
[4] T. Vandenberg,et al. Febrile neutropenia rates with adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in early breast cancer: discrepancy between published reports and community practice-a retrospective analysis. , 2010, Current oncology.
[5] A. Lalonde. Canadian Institute for Health Information. , 1994, Canadian journal of medical technology.
[6] J. Sparano,et al. TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx). , 2006, Clinical breast cancer.
[7] Jack Cuzick,et al. Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[8] J. Zujewski,et al. Trial assessing individualized options for treatment for breast cancer: the TAILORx trial. , 2008, Future oncology.
[9] K. Schulman,et al. Cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in the context of multifactorial decision making to guide chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.
[10] N Mittmann,et al. Economic guidelines for oncology products: Adaptation of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) technology assessment guidance document. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[11] Ariel Hammerman,et al. Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization. , 2010, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[12] S. Schraub,et al. Epirubicin increases long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with poor-prognosis, node-positive, early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[13] J. Ross,et al. MammaPrint™ 70-gene signature: another milestone in personalized medical care for breast cancer patients , 2009, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.
[14] M. Zelen,et al. Prolonged disease-free survival after one course of perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy for node-negative breast cancer. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.
[15] P. Tartter,et al. Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer? , 2008, American journal of surgery.
[16] Karen A Gelmon,et al. Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[17] Robert B Livingston,et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.
[18] T. Delozier,et al. Sequential adjuvant epirubicin-based and docetaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: the FNCLCC PACS 01 Trial. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[19] J. Hornberger,et al. Impact of a 21‐gene RT‐PCR assay on treatment decisions in early‐stage breast cancer , 2007, Cancer.
[20] F. Rojo,et al. Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) node-negative breast cancer. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[21] Benefit of a high-dose epirubicin regimen in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients with poor prognostic factors: 5-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[22] J. Cuzick,et al. Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[23] A. Cohn,et al. Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of oncology practice.
[24] M. Cronin,et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[25] M. Cronin,et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.
[26] D. Rayson,et al. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis for adjuvant TC or FEC-D chemotherapy outside of clinical trial settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, Supportive Care in Cancer.
[27] B. Jönsson,et al. Health related quality of life in different states of breast cancer , 2007, Quality of Life Research.
[28] F. Holmes,et al. Docetaxel With Cyclophosphamide Is Associated With an Overall Survival Benefit Compared With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide: 7-Year Follow-Up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[29] Jenny C. Chang,et al. Survival of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.
[30] Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al. Economic evaluation of 21-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer in Japan , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[31] J. Berthelot,et al. Estimates of the lifetime costs of breast cancer treatment in Canada. , 2000, European journal of cancer.
[32] Anna L. Brown,et al. Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowe , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[33] S. Swain,et al. The influence of a Gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions , 2008, Journal of surgical oncology.
[34] B. Hillner. Impact of a 21-Gene RT-PCR Assay on Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer , 2008 .
[35] S. Verma,et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of recurrence score-guided treatment using a 21-gene assay in early breast cancer. , 2010, The oncologist.
[36] Hans Christian Pedersen,et al. Mammostrat® as a tool to stratify breast cancer patients at risk of recurrence during endocrine therapy , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.
[37] T. Yamanaka,et al. Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX®) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03) , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[38] M. Espié,et al. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer: results of a randomized trial. The International Collaborative Cancer Group. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.