Robust Estimation of Propensity Score Weights via Subclassification

The propensity score plays a central role in inferring causal effects from observational studies. In particular, weighting and subclassification are two principal approaches to estimate the average causal effect based on estimated propensity scores. Unlike the conventional version of the propensity score subclassification estimator, if the propensity score model is correctly specified, the weighting methods offer consistent and possibly efficient estimation of the average causal effect. However, this theoretical appeal may be diminished in practice by sensitivity to misspecification of the propensity score model. In contrast, subclassification methods are usually more robust to model misspecification. We hence propose to use subclassification for robust estimation of propensity score weights. Our approach is based on the intuition that the inverse probability weighting estimator can be seen as the limit of subclassification estimators as the number of subclasses goes to infinity. By formalizing this intuition, we propose novel propensity score weighting estimators that are both consistent and robust to model misspecification. Empirical studies show that the proposed estimators perform favorably compared to existing methods.

[1]  K. C. G. Chan,et al.  Globally efficient non‐parametric inference of average treatment effects by empirical balancing calibration weighting , 2016, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[2]  J. Zubizarreta.  Stable Weights that Balance Covariates for Estimation With Incomplete Outcome Data , 2015 .

[3]  Qingyuan Zhao,et al.  Double Robustness for Causal Effects via Entropy Balancing , 2015 .

[4]  Qingyuan Zhao,et al.  Primal-dual Covariate Balance and Minimal Double Robustness via Entropy Balancing , 2015 .

[5]  J. W. Woo Baidal,et al.  Protecting progress against childhood obesity--the National School Lunch Program. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Rotnitzky Andrea,et al.  Double-Robust Methods , 2014 .

[7]  M. Henmi,et al.  Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect , 2014, Biometrics.

[8]  K. Imai,et al.  Covariate balancing propensity score , 2014 .

[9]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Variance estimation for stratified propensity score estimators , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Tyler J VanderWeele,et al.  On causal inference in the presence of interference , 2012, Statistical methods in medical research.

[11]  Christine L. Taylor,et al.  School Meals: Building Blocks for Healthy Children , 2010 .

[12]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. , 2010, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[13]  J. Wellner,et al.  Empirical Processes with Applications to Statistics , 2009 .

[14]  G. Imbens,et al.  Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score , 2009 .

[15]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Undersmoothed Kernel Entropy Estimators , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data , 2008, 0804.2962.

[17]  Gary King,et al.  Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference , 2008 .

[18]  Joseph Kang,et al.  Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data , 2007, 0804.2973.

[19]  D. Rubin.  The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  Keying Ye,et al.  Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference From Incomplete-Data Perspectives , 2005, Technometrics.

[21]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  D. Rubin.  Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation , 2001, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[23]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology , 2000, Epidemiology.

[24]  G. Imbens,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score , 2000 .

[25]  G. Imbens.  The Role of the Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-Response Functions , 1999 .

[26]  J. Robins,et al.  Undersmoothing and bias corrected functional estimation , 1998 .

[27]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimation of Regression Coefficients When Some Regressors are not Always Observed , 1994 .

[28]  W. Newey,et al.  Series Estimation of Regression Functionals , 1994, Econometric Theory.

[29]  C. Drake.  Effects of misspecification of the propensity score on estimators of treatment effect , 1993 .

[30]  P. Rosenbaum.  Model-Based Direct Adjustment , 1987 .

[31]  D. Rubin,et al.  Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score , 1985 .

[32]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[33]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[34]  D. Horvitz,et al.  A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe , 1952 .

[35]  ˇ. Markoˇ.  ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSION FOR INVERSE MOMENTS OF BINOMIAL AND POISSON DISTRIBUTIONS , 2005 .

[36]  D. McCaffrey,et al.  Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[37]  G. Imbens,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score 1 , 2002 .

[38]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .