OCTA as an independent science advice provider for COVID-19 in the Philippines

[1]  Raymond John D Vergara,et al.  Building public trust: a response to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy predicament. , 2021, Journal of public health.

[2]  R. Hartl,et al.  How long should the COVID-19 lockdown continue? , 2020, PloS one.

[3]  Filomeno V. Aguilar.  Preparedness, Agility, and the Philippine Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic The Early Phase in Comparative Southeast Asian Perspective , 2020, Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints.

[4]  Warren Pearce.  Trouble in the trough: how uncertainties were downplayed in the UK’s science advice on Covid-19 , 2020, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.

[5]  P. Gluckman,et al.  Tracking global knowledge-to-policy pathways in the coronavirus crisis: A preliminary report from ongoing research , 2020 .

[6]  K. Leung,et al.  The gradual release exit strategy after lockdown against COVID-19 , 2020, The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific.

[7]  A. Cook,et al.  Modelling lockdown and exit strategies for COVID-19 in Singapore , 2020, The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific.

[8]  Benjamin M. Vallejo,et al.  Policy responses and government science advice for the COVID 19 pandemic in the Philippines: January to April 2020 , 2020, Progress in Disaster Science.

[9]  N. G. Davies,et al.  Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Public Health.

[10]  M. Dewatripont,et al.  Preparing for a responsible lockdown exit strategy , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[11]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[12]  W. Pearce,et al.  What do we know about public attitudes towards experts? Reviewing survey data in the United Kingdom and European Union , 2019, Public understanding of science.

[13]  H. Larson,et al.  Vaccine confidence plummets in the Philippines following dengue vaccine scare: why it matters to pandemic preparedness , 2018, Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics.

[14]  P. Gluckman.  The science–policy interface , 2016, Science.

[15]  D. Erasga,et al.  Towards policy-relevant science and scientifically informed policy , 2013 .

[16]  Simon Cauchemez,et al.  Managing and reducing uncertainty in an emerging influenza pandemic. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Dorothea Hilhorst,et al.  The politics of risk in the Philippines: comparing state and NGO perceptions of disaster management. , 2009, Disasters.

[18]  J. Steven Picou,et al.  Postnormal Science, Precautionary Principle, and Worst Cases: The Challenge of Twenty-First Century Catastrophes* , 2008 .

[19]  J. P. van der Sluijs,et al.  Uncertainty as a monster in the science-policy interface: four coping strategies. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  J. R. Ravets,et al.  Post-Normal Science , 2006 .

[21]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science , 1994 .

[22]  O. Greene.  Inventing accuracy: a historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance , 1992 .

[23]  Jack R. Benjamin,et al.  Making Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty , 1974 .