Evidence for prenatal competition among the central arbors of trigeminal primary afferent neurons

Previous studies have shown that damage to vibrissa follicles in newborn rats and mice does not alter the brainstem representations of the remaining vibrissa as demonstrated by staining for mitochondrial enzymes such as cytochrome oxidase (CO) succinic dehydrogenase. This study asked whether this lack of effect might be due to the fact that the trigeminal primary afferents in rodents are already quite well developed at birth. We assessed this possibility by using CO staining the evaluate patterns in the brainstems of pre- and postnatal rats. A vibrissa-related pattern began to emerge in trigeminal nucleus principalis and subnucleus interpolaris (Spl) by embryonic day (E-) 19 and appeared fully developed by the day of birth (P-0). We also made partial lesions of the vibrissa pad on E-15–20 and on P-0, killed pups on P-5–7, and measured the size of the CO-stained patches in Spl on both sides of the brainstem. The correspondence between CO patches and clusters of primary afferent terminal arbors was verified in some animals by combining transganglionic horseradish peroxidase tracing and CO staining. Vibrissa pad damage on E-15–18 resulted in significant (20.1–36.9%) increases in the average area of the remaining CO patches in Spl ipsilateral to the lesion. Vibrissa pad damage on E-19, E-20, and P-0 produced small (6.2–8.9%), but insignificant, increases in patch size in Spl ipsilateral to the lesion. We used anatomical and electrophysiological methods to determine whether our lesions altered the trigeminal innervation of surviving vibrissa follicles. We recorded single trigeminal ganglion cells from 12 rats that sustained vibrissa pad lesion on E-17. As in normal rats, all of the 49 vibrissa-sensitive ganglion cells isolated in the lesioned animals were responsive to deflection of one and only one vibrissa. We also dissected 11 deep vibrissal nerves from intact follicles in adult rats that sustained fetal vibrissa pad damage on E-17, and counted numbers of myelinated axons in 1 microns plastic sections. These data were compared with counts from corresponding follicles on the intact side of the face. The average number of myelinated axons innervating follicles in the damaged vibrissa pads was 196.8 +/- 27.9, and that for the corresponding contralateral nerves was 194.6 +/- 25.7. These data suggest that competitive interactions among the central arbors of trigeminal primary afferents in fetal life may influence the development of central vibrissa representations and, further, that lesion-induced central changes need not be correlated with alterations in the peripheral innervation of undamaged follicles.

[1]  M. Sur,et al.  Axon arbors of X and Y retinal ganglion cells are differentially affected by prenatal disruption of binocular inputs. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Peripheral specification of sensory connections in the spinal cord. , 1988 .

[3]  R S Erzurumlu,et al.  Development of order in the rat trigeminal system , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  T. Woolsey,et al.  Effects of neonatal whisker lesions on mouse central trigeminal pathways , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  D. Hubel,et al.  EFFECTS OF VISUAL DEPRIVATION ON MORPHOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF CELLS IN THE CATS LATERAL GENICULATE BODY. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  B. Mendelson,et al.  Role of competition among sensory neurons in regulation of pattern of innervation at their central and peripheral targets. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  S. A. Scott,et al.  The effects of neural crest deletions on the development of sensory innervation patterns in embryonic chick hind limb. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  M. Westerfield,et al.  The formation of appropriate central and peripheral connexions by foreign sensory neurones of the bullfrog , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Reorganization of the peripheral projections of the trigeminal ganglion following neonatal transection of the infraorbital nerve. , 1987, Somatosensory research.

[10]  J. Diamond,et al.  Temporal and spatial constraints on the collateral sprouting of low‐threshold mechanosensory nerves in the skin of rats , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  T. Woolsey,et al.  Areal changes in mouse cortical barrels following vibrissal damage at different postnatal ages , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  C. Shatz,et al.  Prenatal development of cat retinogeniculate axon arbors in the absence of binocular interactions , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  KF Jensen,et al.  Terminal arbors of axons projecting to the somatosensory cortex of the adult rat. II. The altered morphology of thalamocortical afferents following neonatal infraorbital nerve cut , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Guillery Binocular competition in the control of geniculate cell growth , 1972, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  H. Killackey,et al.  The organization of the neonatal rat's brainstem trigeminal complex and its role in the formation of central trigeminal patterns , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Functional consequences of neonatal infraorbital nerve section in rat trigeminal ganglion , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  H. Killackey,et al.  The formation of afferent patterns in the somatosensory cortex of the neonatal rat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Development and plasticity in hamster trigeminal primary afferent projections. , 1987, Brain research.

[19]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Effects of neonatal infraorbital lesions upon central trigeminal primary afferent projections in rat and hamster , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  R W Guillery,et al.  Experiments to determine whether retinogeniculate axons can form translaminar collateral sprouts in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat , 1972, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  R. Williams,et al.  Organization of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus following interruption of prenatal binocular competition. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[22]  B. Mendelson,et al.  Specification of synaptic connections between sensory and motor neurons in the developing spinal cord. , 1990, Journal of neurobiology.

[23]  M. Fitzgerald The sprouting of saphenous nerve terminals in the spinal cord following early postnatal sciatic nerve section in the rat , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  S. Ho,et al.  Competition between segmental nerves at end‐plates in rat gastrocnemius muscle during loss of polyneuronal innervation. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Tetramethyl benzidine for horseradish peroxidase neurohistochemistry: a non-carcinogenic blue reaction product with superior sensitivity for visualizing neural afferents and efferents. , 1978, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[26]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Reorganization of trigeminal primary afferents following neonatal infraorbital nerve section in hamster. , 1983, Brain research.

[27]  G. Vrbóva,et al.  Plasticity of acid phosphatase (FRAP) afferent terminal fields and of dorsal horn cell growth in the neonatal rat , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  D. Hubel,et al.  The development of ocular dominance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  P. Rakic,et al.  Development of visual centers in the primate brain depends on binocular competition before birth. , 1981, Science.

[30]  J. Lund,et al.  Synaptic Adjustment after Deafferentation of the Superior Colliculus of the Rat , 1971, Science.

[31]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Effect of fetal infraorbital nerve transection upon trigeminal primary afferent projections in the rat , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[32]  A. Seiger,et al.  Development of substance P-immunoreactive neurons in cranial sensory ganglia of the rat , 1984, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[33]  S. Sherman,et al.  Organization of visual pathways in normal and visually deprived cats. , 1982, Physiological reviews.

[34]  W. Welker,et al.  Coding of somatic sensory input by vibrissae neurons in the rat's trigeminal ganglion. , 1969, Brain research.

[35]  H. Killackey,et al.  The sensitive period in the development of the trigeminal system of the neonatal rat , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  L. Ungewitter A urea silver nitrate method for nerve fibers and nerve endings. , 1951, Stain technology.

[37]  E. Kinnman,et al.  Collateral sprouting of sensory axons in the glabrous skin of the hindpaw after chronic sciatic nerve lesion in adult and neonatal rats: a morphological study , 1986, Brain Research.

[38]  M. Wong-Riley Changes in the visual system of monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstrable with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry , 1979, Brain Research.

[39]  J. Caldwell,et al.  The effects of partial denervation at birth on the development of muscle fibres and motor units in rat lumbrical muscle. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  R. Rhoades,et al.  Neonatal infraorbital nerve transection in rat results in peripheral trigeminal sprouting , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  L. Beazley,et al.  Expanded retinofugal projections to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus and superior colliculus after unilateral enucleation in the wallaby Setonix brachyurus, quokka. , 1989, Brain research. Developmental brain research.