Utility-based forwarder selection for content dissemination in vehicular networks

Recent work has shown that content dissemination protocols in vehicular networks can achieve throughput and fan-out delay optimization by either simple network flooding or destination-driven dissemination. While those content dissemination schemes work well, they require all nodes in the network to forward every data packet, which has inherent inefficiencies for non-flooding traffic patterns, where not all nodes need to receive the data. Hence, they support adequately safety applications, being not efficient for non-safety applications, whereby the flow of information is interest-driven rather than destination-driven, e.g. restaurant recommendation and sale advertisement. In this work, the concept of “useful” forwarder is formalized aiming at maximizing content utility for end users. Further, it presents I-SEND, a forwarder selection approach, which enables nodes to choose the most appropriate forwarders. Incorporating I-SEND on trace-driven and synthetic simulation scenarios can produce higher content utility than other concurrent schemes.

[1]  J. Ott,et al.  Simulating Mobility and DTNs with the ONE , 2010 .

[2]  Mads Haahr,et al.  Social network analysis for routing in disconnected delay-tolerant MANETs , 2007, MobiHoc '07.

[3]  R. S. Raw,et al.  Comprehensive Study of Estimation of Path Duration in Vehicular Ad Hoc Network , 2012, ACITY.

[4]  Matthias Grossglauser,et al.  CRAWDAD dataset epfl/mobility (v.2009-02-24) , 2009 .

[5]  Luciano Bononi,et al.  Group communication on highways: An evaluation study of geocast protocols and applications , 2013, Ad Hoc Networks.

[6]  Jörg Ott,et al.  Simulating Mobility and DTNs with the ONE (Invited Paper) , 2010, J. Commun..

[7]  Yau-Hwang Kuo,et al.  Cooperative destination discovery protocol with enhanced next forwarder selection scheme for vehicular Ad hoc networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[8]  Jörg Ott,et al.  The ONE simulator for DTN protocol evaluation , 2009, SIMUTools 2009.

[9]  Paolo Bellavista,et al.  Dissemination and Harvesting of Urban Data Using Vehicular Sensing Platforms , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  John Lee,et al.  A survey and challenges in routing and data dissemination in vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety.

[11]  John Lee,et al.  A survey and challenges in routing and data dissemination in vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2008, ICVES.

[12]  Bertrand Ducourthial,et al.  How to disseminate vehicular data efficiently in both highway and urban environments? , 2010, 2010 IEEE 6th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications.

[13]  Pan Hui,et al.  BUBBLE Rap: Social-Based Forwarding in Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[14]  A. Vasilakos,et al.  Socially Aware Networking: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Systems Journal.

[15]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks , 2009 .

[16]  Paul J. M. Havinga,et al.  On the applicability of fair and adaptive data dissemination in traffic information systems , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[17]  Mianxiong Dong,et al.  ZOOM: Scaling the mobility for fast opportunistic forwarding in vehicular networks , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[18]  Lixin Gao,et al.  Prediction-Based Routing for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.