Seismic fragility of open ground storey RC frames with wall openings for vulnerability assessment

Abstract Reinforced concrete (RC) buildings with open ground storey (OGS) are characterized by accumulation of large lateral displacement at the ground storey. This is due to drastic reduction in relative stiffness of the ground storey compared to the upper stories, a phenomenon known as soft storey effect. Openings present in the masonry infill walls reduce both the lateral strength and stiffness of the fully infill RC frames. It is a general perception about OGS buildings that openings present in the infill walls reduce the stiffness of upper storeys, and thus, offsets the soft storey effect. In the present study, this issue is investigated by carrying out a simplified performance assessment of low- to mid-rise masonry infill RC frames with different infill configurations followed by fragility analyses. It is observed from fragility analyses that there is practically no influence of openings in masonry infill walls of OGS frames on lateral load behavior of such frames. OGS frames with any bay and storey configuration, even with large openings in infill walls, remain highly vulnerable to earthquakes. A new representation of fragility, Fragility Flow Plot, is proposed, independent of discrete damage states, where results of the fragility analyses can be shown for different parameters, such as, natural period of vibration, number of bays and storeys, and openings. The present study contributes towards quantification of seismic fragility and vulnerability of OGS building frames and establishes an initiative for seismic fragility based design of OGS frames using the Fragility Flow Plots.

[1]  Devrim Özhendekci,et al.  Rapid Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Low- to Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Bingöl's Regional Data , 2012 .

[2]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[3]  Jun Shang Kuang,et al.  Nonlinear seismic responses and lateral force transfer mechanisms of RC frames with different infill configurations , 2015 .

[4]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  A MULTILEVEL APPROACH TO THE CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS , 2005 .

[5]  A. Kiremidjian,et al.  Statistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility curves , 2015 .

[6]  Hemant B. Kaushik,et al.  Impact of Great December 26, 2004 Sumatra Earthquake and Tsunami on Structures in Port Blair , 2007 .

[7]  Philippe Guéguen.  Seismic Vulnerability of Structures , 2013 .

[8]  Durgesh C. Rai,et al.  Effectiveness of Some Strengthening Options for Masonry-Infilled RC Frames with Open First Story , 2009 .

[9]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF VERTICALLY IRREGULAR FRAMES: RESPONSE HISTORY AND MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSES , 2004 .

[10]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Effects of vertical irregularity and thickness of unreinforced masonry infill on the robustness of RC framed buildings , 2014 .

[11]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[12]  Alex H. Barbat,et al.  Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: Application to Barcelona , 2008 .

[13]  B. Ellingwood,et al.  Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid‐America , 2007 .

[14]  N. Null.  Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings , 2014 .

[15]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Post‐earthquake functionality of highway overpass bridges , 2006 .

[16]  R. Goel,et al.  Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods Based on Inelastic Design Spectrum , 1999 .

[17]  S. Lagomarsino,et al.  Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings , 2006 .

[18]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  SOFT STOREY EFFECTS IN UNIFORMLY INFILLED REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES , 2001 .

[19]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Evaluation of Nonlinear Static Procedures in the Assessment of Building Frames , 2013 .

[20]  D. C. Haran Pragalath,et al.  Multiplication factor for open ground storey buildings–a reliability based evaluation , 2016, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[21]  Guido Magenes,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS , 2006 .

[22]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Simplified non‐linear seismic analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames , 2005 .

[23]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Evaluation of analytical methodologies used to derive vulnerability functions , 2014 .

[24]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design , 2000 .

[25]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  SEISMIC DESIGN OF OPEN-STOREY INFILLED RC BUILDINGS , 1999 .

[26]  Durgesh C. Rai,et al.  Performance of Structures in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (India) during the December 2004 Great Sumatra Earthquake and Indian Ocean Tsunami , 2006 .

[27]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Seismic Reliability Assessment of Aging Highway Bridge Networks with Field Instrumentation Data and Correlated Failures, I: Methodology , 2014 .

[28]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  THE N2 METHOD FOR THE SEISMIC DAMAGE ANALYSIS OF RC BUILDINGS , 1996 .

[29]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings , 2006 .

[30]  V. K. Sehgal,et al.  Seismic Response of Moment Resisting Frame with Open Ground Storey Designed as per Code Provisions , 2015 .

[31]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Nonlinear Static Procedure for Fragility Curve Development , 2000 .

[32]  Hemant B. Kaushik,et al.  Behavior and failure mechanisms of masonry-infilled RC frames (in low-rise buildings) subject to lateral loading , 2016 .

[33]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Application of Nonlinear Static Procedures for the Seismic Assessment of Regular RC Moment Frame Buildings , 2014 .

[34]  Musa Resheidat,et al.  Rapid assessment for seismic vulnerability of low and medium rise infilled RC frame buildings , 2015, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[35]  Sekhar Chandra Dutta,et al.  2011 Sikkim Earthquake at Eastern Himalayas: Lessons learnt from performance of structures , 2015 .

[36]  Rakesh K. Goel.  Evaluation of Modal and FEMA Pushover Procedures Using Strong-Motion Records of Buildings , 2005 .

[37]  Aurelio Ghersi,et al.  On the evaluation of seismic response of structures by nonlinear static methods , 2009 .

[38]  Durgesh C. Rai,et al.  Stress-Strain Characteristics of Clay Brick Masonry under Uniaxial Compression , 2007 .