Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change

This article reviews the concept of policy entrepreneurship and its use in explaining policy change. Although the activities of policy entrepreneurs have received close attention in several studies, the concept of policy entrepreneurship is yet to be broadly integrated within analyses of policy change. To facilitate more integration of the concept, we here show how policy entrepreneurship can be understood within more encompassing theorizations of policy change: incrementalism, policy streams, institutionalism, punctuated equilibrium, and advocacy coalitions. Recent applications of policy entrepreneurship as a key explanation of policy change are presented as models for future work. Room exists for further conceptual development and empirical testing concerning policy entrepreneurship. Such work could be undertaken in studies of contemporary and historical policy change. Scholars of public policy often seek to explain how particular policy ideas catch on. The dynamics of policy change have been theorized and explored empirically from a range of perspectives during the past few decades. In these investigations, the role played by specific advocates of policy change has been frequently noted. Highly motivated individuals or small teams can do much to draw attention to policy problems, present innovative policy solutions, build coalitions of supporters, and secure legislative action. Of course, no political activity or policy initiative can go anywhere without many actors getting involved. The question then arises: By what means can advocates of policy change come to have broad influence? Several policy scholars have argued that such advocates achieve success because they exhibit a high degree of entrepreneurial flare. According to this line of argument, by closely observing the practices of advocates of policy change, we can come to appreciate how they perform a function in the policy process equivalent to entrepreneurs in the business context. Following an emerging convention, we here define such advocates of policy change as policy entrepreneurs. This article foregrounds policy entrepreneurship as an explanation of policy change. While the activities of policy entrepreneurs have received close attention in several studies (Crowley, 2003; Kingdon, 1984/1995; Mintrom, 2000; Roberts & King, 1991; Weissert, 1991), the concept of policy entrepreneurship is yet to be broadly integrated within studies of policy change. We contend that new applica

[1]  State Attorneys General, Entrepreneurship and Consumer Protection in the New Federalism , 2003 .

[2]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[3]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  To Manage Is to Govern , 2002 .

[4]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy‐Making , 2000 .

[5]  R. Burt The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[6]  P. '. Hart,et al.  Leadership and Institutional Reform: Engineering Macroeconomic Policy Change in Australia , 2003 .

[7]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Frame Reflection: Toward The Resolution Of Intractable Policy Controversies , 1994 .

[8]  Manuel P. Teodoro Bureaucratic Job Mobility and The Diffusion of Innovations , 2009 .

[9]  Graham Allison,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[10]  D. Knoke Political Networks: Political Networks , 1990 .

[11]  Brigid Laffan,et al.  From policy entrepreneur to policy manager: the challenge facing the European Commission , 1997 .

[12]  D. Knoke Political Networks: Contents , 1990 .

[13]  Joseph A. Schlesinger Political Parties and the Winning of Office , 1994 .

[14]  L. Ringius Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas, Transnational Policy Entrepreneurs, and Environmental Regimes , 2000 .

[15]  I. Geva‐May Riding the Wave of Opportunity: Termination in Public Policy , 2004 .

[16]  O. Holsti,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[17]  Paul J. Quirk,et al.  The Politics Of Deregulation , 1985 .

[18]  D. Knoke,et al.  Political Networks: The Structural Perspective , 1992 .

[19]  Y. Carter,et al.  From Street‐level Bureaucrats to Street‐level Policy Entrepreneurs? Central Policy and Local Action in Lottery‐funded Community Cancer Care , 2007 .

[20]  J. Knott,et al.  Policy Venture Capital , 2007 .

[21]  T. Oliver,et al.  Translating ideas into actions: entrepreneurial leadership in state health care reforms. , 1997, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[22]  Mark Schneider,et al.  Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government , 1995 .

[23]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[24]  Jack L. Walker The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[25]  Tom Dyson The Politics of German Defence and Security: Policy Leadership and Military Reform in the post-Cold War Era , 2007 .

[26]  P. John,et al.  Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change? , 2003 .

[27]  A. Vedlitz,et al.  The Politics of Problem Definition , 2005 .

[28]  Deborah Meier,et al.  The Power Of Their Ideas , 1995 .

[29]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States , 2006 .

[30]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics , 1989 .

[31]  D. Stone Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy , 2004 .

[32]  Kathrin Zippel,et al.  Transnational Advocacy Networks and Policy Cycles in the European Union: The Case of Sexual Harassment , 2004 .

[33]  M. Moore,et al.  Political Ambition's Effect on Legislative Behavior: Schlesinger's Typology Reconsidered and Revisited , 1993, The Journal of Politics.

[34]  Cameron Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Organizations (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[35]  K. Thelen Historical Institutionalism in comparative politics , 1997 .

[36]  T. Hammar European immigration policy: The policymaking process , 1985 .

[37]  Ronald A. Heifetz,et al.  Leadership Without Easy Answers , 1996 .

[38]  B. Peters Agenda‐setting in the European community , 1994 .

[39]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .

[40]  F. Scharpf Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research , 1997 .

[41]  C. MacKenzie Policy entrepreneurship in Australia: a conceptual review and application , 2004 .

[42]  A. Reinstaller Policy entrepreneurship in the co-evolution of institutions, preferences, and technology: Comparing the diffusion of totally chlorine free pulp bleaching technologies in the US and Sweden , 2005 .

[43]  Michael Barzelay,et al.  From “New Institutionalism” to “Institutional Processualism”: Advancing Knowledge about Public Management Policy Change , 2006 .

[44]  P. Sabatier Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[45]  Regulation in the States , 2004 .

[46]  John W. Kingdon Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[47]  Colin Provost The Politics of Consumer Protection: Explaining State Attorney General Participation in Multi-State Lawsuits , 2006 .

[48]  A. Schneider,et al.  Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[49]  Michael Mintrom,et al.  Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice , 2000 .

[50]  Steven J. Balla,et al.  Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations , 2001 .

[51]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation , 1997 .

[52]  Edgar Grande,et al.  Transnational cooperation and policy networks in European science policy-making , 1999 .

[53]  Xufeng Zhu Strategy of Chinese policy entrepreneurs in the third sector: challenges of “Technical Infeasibility” , 2008 .

[54]  Change the World : How Ordinary People Can Achieve Extraordinary Results , 2000 .

[55]  S. Vergari,et al.  Foundation Engagement in Education Policymaking: Assessing Philanthropic Support of School Choice Initiatives , 2009 .

[56]  Michael Mintrom The State-Local Nexus in Policy Innovation Diffusion: The Case of School Choice , 1997 .

[57]  J. True,et al.  Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming , 2001 .

[58]  S. Meijerink Understanding policy stability and change. the interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945–20031 , 2005 .

[59]  N. Roberts,et al.  Transforming Public Policy: Dynamics of Policy Entrepreneurship and Innovation , 1996 .

[60]  Michael Mintrom,et al.  Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[61]  J. Crowley The politics of child support in America , 2003 .

[62]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change , 1996 .

[63]  B. J. Nelson Making an Issue of Child Abuse , 1986 .

[64]  Karen T. Litfin Advocacy Coalitions Along the Domestic‐Foreign Frontier: Globalization and Canadian Climate Change Policy , 2000 .

[65]  James true Avalanches and Incrementalism , 2000 .

[66]  P. John Ideas and Interests; Agendas and Implementation: An Evolutionary Explanation of Policy Change in British Local Government Finance , 1999 .

[67]  M. Finnemore,et al.  International Norm Dynamics and Political Change , 1998, International Organization.

[68]  P. Sabatier An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein , 1988 .

[69]  M. B. Sanger,et al.  Making government work : how entrepreneurial executives turn bright ideas into real results , 1994 .

[70]  J. Henig Spin cycle : how research is used in policy debates : the case of charter schools , 2008 .

[71]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[72]  Hajime Sato,et al.  The Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Policy Process Analysis: The Case of Smoking Control in Japan , 1999 .

[73]  P. Hall,et al.  Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms , 1996 .

[74]  Jeffrey T. Checkel Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change , 2001, International Organization.

[75]  C. Weissert Policy Entrepreneurs, Policy Opportunists, and Legislative Effectiveness , 1991 .

[76]  R. Fisher,et al.  Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in , 1981 .

[77]  Sue Thomas The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[78]  D. Stone Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making , 1997 .

[79]  R. Hinde,et al.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Collective Action , 2010 .

[80]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[81]  N. Roberts,et al.  Policy Entrepreneurs: Their Activity Structure and Function in the Policy Process , 1991 .

[82]  B. Jones Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy , 1994 .