Investigating the Landscape in National Interoperability Frameworks

Openness, accountability, and transparency have attracted researchers’ and practitioners’ interest as open data and citizen engagement initiatives try to capitalize the wisdom of crowds for better governance, policy making, or even service provision. In this context, interoperability between public organizations, citizens, and enterprises seems to remain the center of interest in the public sector and national interoperability frameworks are continually revised and expanded across the globe in an effort to support the increasing need for seamless exchange of information. This paper outlines the current landscape in eGovernment interoperability, analyzing and comparing frameworks that have reached a certain degree of maturity. Their strengths and weaknesses at conceptual and implementation level are discussed together with directions for reaching consensus and aligning interoperability guidelines at a country and cross-country level.

[1]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Claudio S. Pinhanez A Service Science Perspective on Human-Computer Interface Issues of Online Service Applications , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Serv. Sect..

[3]  Hervé Panetto,et al.  Towards a classification framework for interoperability of enterprise applications , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[4]  Nicole B. Koppel,et al.  InformatIon SyStemS In the ServIce Sector , 2010 .

[5]  Luis Guijarro,et al.  Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Design (SSMED): An Emerging Discipline - Outline & References , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Serv. Sect..

[7]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Unified Data Modelling and Document Standardization Using Core Components Technical Specification for Electronic Government Applications , 2008, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[8]  Carl Adams,et al.  Consumers' Attitudes Toward Mobile Commerce: A Model to Capture the Cultural and Environment Influences , 2010, Int. J. E Serv. Mob. Appl..

[9]  Manfred A. Jeusfeld,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to manage information systems interoperability , 2008, Inf. Syst..

[10]  Sharon S. Dawes An Exploratory Framework for Future E-Government Research Investments , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[11]  Chen-Yang Cheng,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of Surgery Patient Identification Using RFID , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Serv. Sect..

[12]  John Wang,et al.  Innovations in Information Systems for Business Functionality and Operations Management , 2012 .

[13]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Innovation Processes in the Public Sector - New Vistas for an Interdisciplinary Perspective on E-Government Research? , 2007, EGOV.

[14]  John Wang Information Systems and New Applications in the Service Sector: Models and Methods , 2010 .

[15]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Paving the Way to eGovernment Transformation: Interoperability Registry Infrastructure Development , 2008, EGOV.

[16]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Integration in E-Government , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  Eduard Hovy Data and Knowledge Integration for e-Government , 2008, Digital Government.

[18]  Jairo R. Montoya-Torres,et al.  Global Bacteria Optimization Meta-Heuristic Algorithm for Jobshop Scheduling , 2010, Int. J. Oper. Res. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda , 2007 .