Energy efficiency and environmental assessment of papermaking from chemical pulp - A Finland case study

Abstract Pulp and paper manufacturing sector constitutes one of the largest industry segments in the world in terms of water and energy usage as well as of significant use and release of chemicals and combustion products. Since its chief feedstock –wood fiber– is renewable, this industry can play an important role in sustainable development, becoming an example of how a resource can be managed to provide a sustained supply to meet society's current and future needs. This calls for a thorough assessment of environmental costs and impacts associated to pulp and paper operations, including both direct and indirect inputs supporting the whole papermaking process as well as the main outputs, co-products and by-products. By means of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology, this paper aims at assessing the environmental sustainability of the pulp and paper production so as to identify those phases across the whole supply chain that entail the highest environmental loads, thus requiring improvements. To determine the environmental impacts as accurately as possible, the manufacturing stages performed in the pulp and paper mill complex of Stora Enso Oyj Veitsiluoto Mills at Kemi, Northern Finland, were taken as a model and assessed by means of the SimaPro 8 LCA software, utilizing ReCiPe Midpoint (H) method for the impact assessment. As expected, most of the resulting impacts are caused by the industrial production phase. The production processes of pulp and paper jointly affect all the investigated impact categories with the highest shares, ranging from 50% of generated impacts on water depletion up to 88% on freshwater eutrophication. Generally, the main contributions to environmental loads come from the electricity and heat requirements and, only at a minor extent, from the use of chemicals such as the sodium hydroxide and sodium chlorate. In particular, pulp production process generates the main loads on global warming (46% of the total impacts), ozone depletion (39%), freshwater eutrophication (55%), human toxicity (46%), metal depletion (42%) and fossil depletion (46%). In the remaining investigated impact categories, namely terrestrial acidification, photochemical oxidant formation and terrestrial ecotoxicity, most of impacts derive from the use of optical brighteners and fillers in the final steps of paper production and from the intensive consumption of water in the recycling step of end-of-life affecting water depletion. Moreover, the implementation of measures for material and energy efficiency in the assessed system, such as the use of renewable energy generated in situ from black liquor and residual biomass to support the requirements of the integrated pulp and paper mills and the waste paper recycling, resulted to be crucial in lowering the environmental burdens. In particular, the partial fulfillment of electricity and heat requirements by means of a circular use of residues within the system leads to a noteworthy reduction of impacts in all the investigated impact categories, up to more than 70% in global warming and fossil depletion potentials, thus contributing to higher process sustainability compared with other averaged European systems for paper production. The obtained research results are a valuable source of management information for the decision makers, at both company and national levels, with the aim to improve the environmental performance of pulp and paper industry.

[1]  Warit Jawjit,et al.  Options to reduce the environmental impact by eucalyptus-based Kraft pulp industry in Thailand: model description , 2007 .

[2]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Sensitivity analysis to quantify uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment: The case study of an Italian tile , 2011 .

[3]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Environmental impacts of eucalypt and maritime pine wood production in Portugal , 2012 .

[4]  Te Li Su,et al.  Energy flow analysis in pulp and paper industry , 2011 .

[5]  J D Murphy,et al.  A technical, economic, and environmental analysis of energy production from newspaper in Ireland. , 2007, Waste management.

[6]  Antti Asikainen,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from the use of primary energy in forest operations and long-distance transportation of timber in Finland , 1996 .

[7]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Energy decision making in a pulp and paper mill: selection of LCA system boundary , 2010 .

[8]  Sara González-García,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of total chlorine free pulp from Eucalyptus globulus in Spain , 2009 .

[9]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  Reducing climate change gas emissions by cutting out stages in the life cycle of office paper , 2007 .

[10]  T. Viraraghavan,et al.  Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater--a review. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Maria Teresa Moreira,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts of different forest management scenarios for maritime pine biomass production in France , 2014 .

[12]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Application of life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp and paper industry , 2003 .

[13]  Morton A. Barlaz,et al.  Evaluation of life cycle inventory data for recycling systems , 2014 .

[14]  Tiago Domingos,et al.  Industrial hemp or eucalyptus paper? , 2010 .

[15]  Göksel N. Demirer,et al.  Cleaner production opportunity assessment study in SEKA Balikesir pulp and paper mill , 2008 .

[16]  Sotoodehnia Poopak,et al.  Environmental Benefit of Using Bagasse in Paper Production - A Case Study of LCA in Iran , 2012 .

[17]  Anders S. G. Andrae,et al.  Attributional and Consequential Environmental Assessment of the Shift to Lead-Free Solders (10 pp) , 2006 .

[18]  Claudio A. Zaror,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory of Pine and Eucalyptus Cellulose Production in Chile: Effect of Process Modifications , 2011 .

[19]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2011 .

[20]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Dag Henning,et al.  Comparison between material and energy recovery of municipal waste from an energy perspective: A study of two Swedish municipalities , 2004 .

[22]  Huanbin Liu,et al.  Energy conservation and CO2 mitigation potentials in the Chinese pulp and paper industry , 2017 .

[23]  Aldo Roberto Ometto,et al.  Life cycle assessment of offset paper production in Brazil: hotspots and cleaner production alternatives , 2015 .

[24]  Thomas Højlund Christensen,et al.  Life cycle assessment of waste paper management: The importance of technology data and system boundaries in assessing recycling and incineration , 2008 .

[25]  Peter Holm,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the waste hierarchy--a Danish case study on waste paper. , 2007, Waste management.

[26]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Environmental assessment of recycled printing and writing paper: a case study in China. , 2012, Waste management.

[27]  H. Wenzel,et al.  Paper waste - recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments. , 2007, Waste management.

[28]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Chemicals from biomass: technological versus environmental feasibility. A review , 2017 .

[29]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[30]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Life cycle assessment of printing and writing paper produced in Portugal , 2007 .

[31]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  The Next Frontier to Realize Industrial Energy Efficiency , 2011 .

[32]  Sanna Viljakainen,et al.  Introducing a new model for material savings in the Finnish paper industry , 2009 .

[33]  Carlo Vezzoli,et al.  Design for Environmental Sustainability , 2008 .

[34]  Pere Fullana-i-Palmer,et al.  Introducing a new method for calculating the environmental credits of end-of-life material recovery in attributional LCA , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[35]  Agneta Ghose,et al.  Environmental aspects of Norwegian production of pulp fibres and printing paper , 2013 .

[36]  Tapas K. Das,et al.  Evaluating chemical-, mechanical-, and bio-pulping processes and their sustainability characterization using life cycle assessment , 2004 .

[37]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Efficiency and sustainability indicators for papermaking from virgin pulp—An emergy-based case study , 2018 .

[38]  L Rigamonti,et al.  Life cycle assessment for optimising the level of separated collection in integrated MSW management systems. , 2009, Waste management.

[39]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[40]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2 , 2010 .

[41]  B. Giannetti,et al.  Influence of cellulase enzyme production on the energetic–environmental performance of lignocellulosic ethanol , 2015 .

[42]  Barry Hyman,et al.  An energy process-step model for manufacturing paper and paperboard , 1996 .

[43]  Harry L. Brown,et al.  Energy analysis of 108 industrial processes , 1985 .

[44]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  Innovations in papermaking: an LCA of printing and writing paper from conventional and high yield pulp. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[45]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[46]  Tobias Fleiter,et al.  Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs—An empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany , 2012 .

[47]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[48]  Lynn Price,et al.  Assessment of emerging energy-efficiency technologies for the pulp and paper industry: a technical review , 2016 .

[49]  Risto Pöykiö,et al.  A case study of waste management at the Northern Finnish pulp and paper mill complex of Stora Enso Veitsiluoto Mills. , 2007, Waste management.

[50]  P. Bajpai Pulp and Paper Industry: Energy Conservation , 2016 .

[51]  Risto Pöykiö,et al.  Green liquor dregs as an alternative neutralizing agent at a pulp mill , 2006 .

[52]  Staffan Berg,et al.  Energy use and environmental impacts of forest operations in Sweden , 2005 .

[53]  Kenthorai Raman Jegannathan,et al.  Environmental assessment of enzyme use in industrial production – a literature review , 2013 .

[54]  A. Chan,et al.  Preliminary Assessment of the Environmental Benefits of Enzyme Bleaching for Pulp and Paper Making (7 pp) , 2005 .

[55]  Cassiano Moro Piekarski,et al.  Life cycle assessment of medium-density fiberboard (MDF) manufacturing process in Brazil. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[56]  S. Doherty,et al.  Emergy evaluations of and limits to forest production , 1995 .