Multiplicity of Benign Breast Lesions Is a Risk Factor for Progression to Breast Cancer

Purpose: Benign breast disease (BBD) in women encompasses a broad spectrum of histopathologic lesions. Studies on BBD have focused on the risks for subsequent breast cancer associated with three broad categories of lesions, classified as nonproliferative, proliferative, or proliferative with atypia, without addressing the issue of the contribution of concurrent multiple BBD lesions. There is very limited information with regard to the issue of BBD lesion multiplicity and breast cancer risk. Experimental Design: We evaluated a detailed microscopic spectrum of 18 BBD lesions from fibrosis to atypical hyperplasia in a BBD cohort of 4,544 subjects, within which 4.5% (n = 201) developed breast cancer during an average follow-up period of 10.3 years. Lesions were defined as nonproliferative (8 diagnoses; risk level 1 = no risk or low risk), proliferative without atypical hyperplasia (8 diagnoses; risk level 2 = intermediate risk), and proliferative with atypical hyperplasia (2 diagnoses; risk level 3 = highest risk level). Twenty variables including age (≥50 or <50 years) at the time of BBD diagnosis and race (African American or non–African American) were assessed. A categorical variable, surrogate for lesion type and number, was represented initially by four levels: 1, nonproliferative = 1 (reference); 2, nonproliferative > 1; 3, proliferative = 1; and 4, proliferative > 1. Results: The majority of BBD subjects in our cohort (almost 70%) had more than one BBD lesion. Concurrent multiple nonproliferative or proliferative BBD lesions with or without atypia in a BBD biopsy and age are significant predictors of risk for progression of BBD to breast cancer. The presence of atypical hyperplasia in a BBD biopsy alone or in conjunction with other lesions without atypia conferred higher risks. Women with fibrosis had a reduced risk for progression to breast cancer. Race was not a significant predictor of progression to breast cancer. The effect of age, fibrosis, and multiple lesions (whether nonproliferative, proliferative, or atypia) on breast cancer progression was not influenced by race. Conclusion: BBD lesion multiplicity is frequent, and teasing out the heterogeneity of multiple concurrent BBD lesions is warranted to refine and improve risk estimates for progression of breast cancer from BBD.

[1]  A. Cruz,et al.  Pathologic review of atypical hyperplasia identified by image-guided breast needle core biopsy. Correlation with excision specimen. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[2]  Judith Abrams,et al.  Breast Cancer Incidence in a Cohort of Women with Benign Breast Disease from a Multiethnic, Primary Health Care Population , 2007, The breast journal.

[3]  Min Jung Kim,et al.  Focal Fibrosis of the Breast Diagnosed by a Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of Nonpalpable Lesions , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[4]  R. Elledge,et al.  Premalignant and In Situ Breast Disease: Biology and Clinical Implications , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[6]  T. Sutcliffe,et al.  Chronic Conditions, Functional Limitations, and Special Health Care Needs of School-Aged Children Born With Extremely Low-Birth-Weight in the 1990s , 2005, JAMA.

[7]  G. Colditz,et al.  Benign breast disease, recent alcohol consumption, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case–control study , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[8]  H. Stalsberg,et al.  A case-control study of risk factors for fibrocystic breast conditions: Shanghai Nutrition and Breast Disease Study, China, 1995-2000. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  S. Paik,et al.  Lower-category benign breast disease and the risk of invasive breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  M. Kerin,et al.  Pathology and clinical relevance of radial scars: a review , 2003, Journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  Stuart J. Schnitt,et al.  Benign Breast Disease and Breast Cancer Risk: Morphology and Beyond , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[12]  C. Catzavelos,et al.  Stromal fibrosis of the breast. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M. Sherman,et al.  Focal fibrosis of the breast: imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation. , 2000, Radiology.

[14]  E. Rosen,et al.  Focal fibrosis: a common breast lesion diagnosed at imaging-guided core biopsy. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  G. Colditz,et al.  Radial scars in benign breast-biopsy specimens and the risk of breast cancer. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  G. Colditz,et al.  Risk of breast cancer associated with atypical hyperplasia of lobular and ductal types. , 1997, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[17]  L. Brinton,et al.  Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasia , 1993, Cancer.

[18]  R. Hiatt,et al.  Risk of breast cancer after benign breast diseases. Variation by histologic type, degree of atypia, age at biopsy, and length of follow-up. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  G. Colditz,et al.  A prospective study of benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer , 1992, JAMA.

[20]  W. Dupont,et al.  Relative risk of breast cancer varies with time since diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia. , 1989, Human pathology.

[21]  P. Taylor,et al.  A prospective study of the development of breast cancer in 16,692 women with benign breast disease. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  W D Dupont,et al.  Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  G. Hermann,et al.  Focal fibrous disease of the breast: mammographic detection of an unappreciated condition. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Quasi-likelihood estimation for relative risk regression models. , 2005, Biostatistics.

[25]  M. Skolnick Proliferative Breast Disease: Diagnosis and Implications , 2005 .

[26]  A. Morabia,et al.  Epidemiology of benign breast disease, with special attention to histologic types. , 1997, Epidemiologic reviews.

[27]  A. Oza,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk. , 1993, Epidemiologic reviews.

[28]  W. Dupont,et al.  Benign breast disease: indicators of increased breast cancer risk. , 1992, Cancer detection and prevention.

[29]  W. Dupont,et al.  Histopathologic risk factors for breast cancer in women with benign breast disease. , 1988, Seminars in surgical oncology.