Materials in footwear: an empirical study of hands-on textile approaches to sandal design

Commercial sandals are often designed in a 2D format and materials are generally applied during design development rather than the earlier stages of the process. In contrast, handson woven textile design is often carried out through making and interaction with materials. This paper presents the findings of an action research case study that investigated the use of ‘hands-on’ woven textile approaches to sandal design at different stages of the design process. The role that hands-on interaction with materials plays at each stage is analysed to assess areas of potential for its integration. The case study presented in this paper focuses on an aspect of wider research that investigates the potential for innovation through handson interaction with materials in the sandal design process. The research questions for the study are: is there potential for the in-depth knowledge of materials and construction gained through a hands-on approach to be applied in the sandal design process; where and how does it have the potential to be integrated; how does the use of hands-on interaction with materials compare with more conventional approaches at different stages of the design process? The case study was undertaken in the form of a sandal design project that incorporated the use of hands-on woven textile approaches. The designs produced were informed by knowledge generated through hands-on weaving techniques. The discussion of the empirical research refers to a literature review that was conducted alongside this case study. The findings indicate that there is potential for a hands-on woven textile approach to sandal design and it may be integrated at all stages of the design process. Key challenges were noted in relation to issues of time and cost efficiency in comparison to using conventional footwear design approaches alone. Benefits in terms of opportunity for innovation, generation of in-depth knowledge and immediacy, along with control in decision-making are discussed. Hybrid approaches are also identified as being suitable for bringing together outcomes that consist of a number of different formats.

[1]  Owain Pedgley,et al.  Towards a method for documenting industrial design activity from the designer’s perspective , 1997 .

[2]  Mark Evans,et al.  An investigation into the use of haptic modelling during industrial design activity , 2000 .

[3]  Philip Azariadis Finite Element Analysis Methods in Footwear Design , 2012 .

[4]  K. Neidderer,et al.  Craft research: joining emotion and knowledge , 2010 .

[5]  Gülen Çağdaş,et al.  TOWARDS HANDS-ON COMPUTING IN DESIGN: AN ANALYSIS OF THE HAPTIC DIMENSION OF MODEL MAKING , 2011 .

[6]  Michael Tovey,et al.  Styling and design: intuition and analysis in industrial design☆ , 1997 .

[7]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[8]  R. Sennett,et al.  The Craftsman , 2015, London.

[9]  José-Luis Sánchez-Romero,et al.  Augmented and Virtual Reality techniques for footwear , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[10]  John S. Gero,et al.  Drawings and the design process , 1998 .

[11]  Sabit Adanur,et al.  Woven fabric design and analysis in 3D virtual reality. Part 1: computer aided design and modeling of interlaced structures , 2013 .

[12]  J. Ryder A Practical guide to academic research , 1999 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[14]  Owain Pedgley,et al.  Capturing and analysing own design activity , 2007 .

[15]  Jayne Wallace,et al.  All this Useless Beauty: the Case for Craft Practice in Design for a Digital Age , 2004 .

[16]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[17]  Rachel Philpott,et al.  Crafting innovation: the intersection of craft and technology in the production of contemporary textiles , 2012 .

[18]  Gou Rui,et al.  The direction of footwear computer-aided design in China , 2010, 2010 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design 1.

[19]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  CAD and Creativity: Does the Computer Really Help? , 2002, Leonardo.

[20]  Cathy Treadaway Digital Crafting and Crafting the Digital , 2007 .

[21]  Marina Lommerse,et al.  Designing Futures: A Model for Innovation, Growth and Sustainability of the Craft and Design Industry , 2011 .

[22]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  Computers, words and pictures , 1997 .

[23]  David Wallace,et al.  An evaluation of haptic feedback modelling during industrial design practice , 2005 .

[24]  Mark Evans,et al.  Researcher Practice: Embedding Creative Practice Within Doctoral Research in Industrial Design , 2011 .

[25]  N. Cross Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[26]  M. Schwarz,et al.  Making value: craft in changing times , 2011 .

[27]  Jacqueline Anne Wilson,et al.  Core design aspects , 2011 .

[28]  Jacquie Wilson A Handbook of Textile Design;: Principle, Process and Practice , 2001 .

[29]  Donald A. Schön Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[30]  Nithikul Nimkulrat,et al.  Hands-on intellect: integrating craft practice into design research , 2012 .

[31]  Ajay Joneja,et al.  Computer-aided Design of Footwear , 2012 .

[32]  Nigel Cross Can a Machine Design? , 2001, Design Issues.

[33]  Einat Leader Materializing Craft: Evaluating the Effects of Experiencing Actual Materials during the Design Process , 2010 .