Functions of Uni- and Multi-citations: Implications for Weighted Citation Analysis

Abstract Purpose (1) To test basic assumptions underlying frequency-weighted citation analysis: (a) Uni-citations correspond to citations that are nonessential to the citing papers; (b) The influence of a cited paper on the citing paper increases with the frequency with which it is cited in the citing paper. (2) To explore the degree to which citation location may be used to help identify nonessential citations. Design/methodology/approach Each of the in-text citations in all research articles published in Issue 1 of the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) 2016 was manually classified into one of these five categories: Applied, Contrastive, Supportive, Reviewed, and Perfunctory. The distributions of citations at different in-text frequencies and in different locations in the text by these functions were analyzed. Findings Filtering out nonessential citations before assigning weight is important for frequency-weighted citation analysis. For this purpose, removing citations by location is more effective than re-citation analysis that simply removes uni-citations. Removing all citation occurrences in the Background and Literature Review sections and uni-citations in the Introduction section appears to provide a good balance between filtration and error rates. Research limitations This case study suffers from the limitation of scalability and generalizability. We took careful measures to reduce the impact of other limitations of the data collection approach used. Relying on the researcher’s judgment to attribute citation functions, this approach is unobtrusive but speculative, and can suffer from a low degree of confidence, thus creating reliability concerns. Practical implications Weighted citation analysis promises to improve citation analysis for research evaluation, knowledge network analysis, knowledge representation, and information retrieval. The present study showed the importance of filtering out nonessential citations before assigning weight in a weighted citation analysis, which may be a significant step forward to realizing these promises. Originality/value Weighted citation analysis has long been proposed as a theoretical solution to the problem of citation analysis that treats all citations equally, and has attracted increasing research interest in recent years. The present study showed, for the first time, the importance of filtering out nonessential citations in weighted citation analysis, pointing research in this area in a new direction.

[1]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[2]  David Dubin,et al.  The Most Influential Paper Gerard Salton Never Wrote , 2004, Libr. Trends.

[3]  Christophe Hurter,et al.  Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks , 2015 .

[4]  Ming Li,et al.  Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[5]  Chandra G. Prabha,et al.  Some aspects of citation behavior: A pilot study in business administration , 1983, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics , 1989, Scientometrics.

[7]  M. Moravcsik,et al.  Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations , 1975 .

[8]  Bluma C. Peritz.  On the Objectives of Citation Analysis: Problems of Theory and Method , 1992 .

[9]  Martin Buxton,et al.  Using categorisations of citations when assessing the outcomes from health research , 2005, Scientometrics.

[10]  Andreas Strotmann,et al.  Re-citation Analysis: A Promising Method for Improving Citation Analysis for Research Evaluation, Knowledge Network Analysis, Knowledge Representation and Information Retrieval , 2015, ISSI.

[11]  Min Song,et al.  Content-based author co-citation analysis , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[12]  B. C. Griffith.  Understanding Science , 1989 .

[13]  T. Brooks.  Evidence of complex citer motivations , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting? , 1975 .

[15]  M. White,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Citing Behavior: Contributions, Criteria, and Metalevel Documentation Concerns , 1997, The Library Quarterly.

[16]  Henry Voos,et al.  Are All Citations Equal? Or, Did We Op. Cit. Your Idem?. , 1976 .

[17]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  A quasi-quantitative citation model , 1987, Scientometrics.

[18]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Gertrud Herlach,et al.  Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Lubna Zafar,et al.  Citation Context Analysis using Word-Graph , 2019, 2019 2nd International Conference on Communication, Computing and Digital systems (C-CODE).

[21]  Simone Teufel,et al.  Automatic classification of citation function , 2006, EMNLP.

[22]  K. E. Tranøy,et al.  Norms of Inquiry: Rationality, Consistency Requirements and Normative Conflict , 1980 .

[23]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Ying Ding,et al.  The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[25]  D. Cases,et al.  How can we investigate citation behavior?: a study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000 .

[26]  F. Suppe.  The Structure of a Scientific Paper , 1998, Philosophy of Science.

[27]  Susan Bonzi,et al.  Characteristics of a Literature as Predictors of Relatedness Between Cited and Citing Works , 2007, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[28]  E. Garfield,et al.  Can Citation Indexing Be Automated ? , 1964 .

[29]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[30]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication , 1984 .

[31]  L. Brain.  Structure of the scientific paper. , 1965, British medical journal.

[32]  D. Edge.  Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review , 1979, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.

[33]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Mengxiong Liu,et al.  Progress in Documentation the Complexities of citation Practice: a Review of citation studies , 1993, J. Documentation.

[35]  Nigel Harwood.  Citers' use of citees' names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study , 2008 .

[36]  Daniel Lemire,et al.  Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  Donald Owen Case,et al.  How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[38]  V. Cano,et al.  Citation behavior: Classification, utility, and location , 1989, JASIS.

[39]  H. Small.  A Co-Citation Model of a Scientific Specialty: A Longitudinal Study of Collagen Research , 1977 .

[40]  Andrea Bergmann,et al.  Citation Indexing Its Theory And Application In Science Technology And Humanities , 2016 .

[41]  W. Shadish,et al.  Author Judgements about Works They Cite: Three Studies from Psychology Journals , 1995 .

[42]  Ying Ding,et al.  Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[43]  Andreas Strotmann,et al.  Dimensions and uncertainties of author citation rankings: Lessons learned from frequency‐weighted in‐text citation counting , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  Rong Tang,et al.  Author-rated importance of cited references in biology and psychology publications , 2008, J. Documentation.