The complexities of electronic services implementation and institutionalisation in the public sector

Electronic service implementation (ESI) in the public sector attempts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, and transparency of governmental departments. Despite having provided the necessary infrastructure and investment, many governments have struggled to realise such aims due to the various forces that challenge implementation and institutionalisation. Using institutional theory as a lens, we explored the forces influencing the implementation and institutionalisation of ESI in the public sector. While our results reinforced previous research in IT implementation and organisational transformation, they showed that the dynamic nature of technology poses unanticipated pressures, and that these can impede the implementation and institutionalisation process.

[1]  T. Kostova,et al.  Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions , 2008 .

[2]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  From government to e-government: a transition model , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  C. Weare,et al.  Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of E-Government , 2011 .

[5]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[6]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Successful e-government in Singapore , 2004, CACM.

[8]  Atul Gupta,et al.  Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[10]  John F. Affisco,et al.  E-government: a strategic operations management framework for service delivery , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[11]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Learning lessons from evaluating eGovernment: Reflective case experiences that support transformational government , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Seongcheol Kim,et al.  An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[14]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[15]  T. Diefenbach NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS: THE DARK SIDES OF MANAGERIALISTIC ‘ENLIGHTENMENT’ , 2009 .

[16]  M. Crouch,et al.  The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research , 2006 .

[17]  Sue Newell,et al.  Paradoxical effects of institutionalisation on the strategic awareness of technology in organisations , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  E-government around the world: lessons, challenges, and future directions , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Contextualising the IT artefact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[20]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  From technical to socio-technical change: tackling the human and organizational aspects of systems development projects , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  An enterprise application integration methodology for e-government , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[22]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Measuring e-government readiness , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[25]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  The impact of enterprise application integration on information system lifecycles , 2003, Inf. Manag..