Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose: BRCA1/2-mutated and some sporadic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) have DNA repair defects and are sensitive to DNA-damaging therapeutics. Recently, three independent DNA-based measures of genomic instability were developed on the basis of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale state transitions (LST). Experimental Design: We assessed a combined homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score, an unweighted sum of LOH, TAI, and LST scores, in three neoadjuvant TNBC trials of platinum-containing therapy. We then tested the association of HR deficiency, defined as HRD score ≥42 or BRCA1/2 mutation, with response to platinum-based therapy. Results: In a trial of neoadjuvant platinum, gemcitabine, and iniparib, HR deficiency predicted residual cancer burden score of 0 or I (RCB 0/I) and pathologic complete response (pCR; OR = 4.96, P = 0.0036; OR = 6.52, P = 0.0058). HR deficiency remained a significant predictor of RCB 0/I when adjusted for clinical variables (OR = 5.86, P = 0.012). In two other trials of neoadjuvant cisplatin therapy, HR deficiency predicted RCB 0/I and pCR (OR = 10.18, P = 0.0011; OR = 17.00, P = 0.0066). In a multivariable model of RCB 0/I, HR deficiency retained significance when clinical variables were included (OR = 12.08, P = 0.0017). When restricted to BRCA1/2 nonmutated tumors, response was higher in patients with high HRD scores: RCB 0/I P = 0.062, pCR P = 0.063 in the neoadjuvant platinum, gemcitabine, and iniparib trial; RCB 0/I P = 0.0039, pCR P = 0.018 in the neoadjuvant cisplatin trials. Conclusions: HR deficiency identifies TNBC tumors, including BRCA1/2 nonmutated tumors more likely to respond to platinum-containing therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(15); 3764–73. ©2016 AACR.

[1]  K. Jensen,et al.  Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status predicts response to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative or BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[2]  M. Rezai,et al.  Prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) by Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) after carboplatin-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with TNBC: Results from GeparSixto. , 2015 .

[3]  Nicolai J. Birkbak,et al.  Pan-cancer analysis of genomic scar signatures associated with homologous recombination deficiency suggests novel indications for existing cancer drugs , 2015, Biomarker Research.

[4]  James M Ford,et al.  Phase II Study of Gemcitabine, Carboplatin, and Iniparib As Neoadjuvant Therapy for Triple-Negative and BRCA1/2 Mutation-Associated Breast Cancer With Assessment of a Tumor-Based Measure of Genomic Instability: PrECOG 0105. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  D. Berry,et al.  Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  D. Pruss,et al.  A comprehensive laboratory‐based program for classification of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer genes , 2014, Clinical genetics.

[7]  M. Rezai,et al.  Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[9]  D. Berry,et al.  Abstract S5-02: Veliparib/carboplatin plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer: First efficacy results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL , 2013 .

[10]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[11]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. , 2012, Cancer research.

[12]  G. Mills,et al.  Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  D. Livingston,et al.  Mechanisms of BRCA1 tumor suppression. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[14]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[15]  J. Schiffman,et al.  Molecular inversion probes: a novel microarray technology and its application in cancer research. , 2012, Cancer genetics.

[16]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Telomeric allelic imbalance indicates defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[17]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Integrated Genomic Analyses of Ovarian Carcinoma , 2011, Nature.

[18]  E. Alli,et al.  Synergistic chemosensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer cell lines to poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibition, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. , 2010, Cancer research.

[19]  C. Perou,et al.  Allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  G. Mills,et al.  Somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could expand the number of patients that benefit from poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  E. Winer,et al.  Neoadjuvant cisplatin and bevacizumab in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): Safety and efficacy. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  E. Alli,et al.  Defective repair of oxidative dna damage in triple-negative breast cancer confers sensitivity to inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. , 2009, Cancer research.

[24]  J. Kładny,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[25]  Christos Hatzis,et al.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  A. Ashworth,et al.  BRCA1 dysfunction in sporadic basal-like breast cancer , 2007, Oncogene.

[27]  Shridar Ganesan,et al.  X chromosomal abnormalities in basal-like human breast cancer. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[28]  Julian Peto,et al.  Prediction of BRCA1 Status in Patients with Breast Cancer Using Estrogen Receptor and Basal Phenotype , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Hallmarks of 'BRCAness' in sporadic cancers , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[30]  Sridhar Ramaswamy,et al.  Loss of Heterozygosity and Its Correlation with Expression Profiles in Subclasses of Invasive Breast Cancers , 2004, Cancer Research.

[31]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.