A wearable earpad sensor for chewing monitoring

Today dietary assessments require manual information sampling in paper or electronic questionnaires on food type and other diet-related details. Low accuracies of 50% are confirmed for self-reporting, which weakens diet coaching effectiveness and is a major limitation for today's diet programs. Automatic Dietary Monitoring (ADM) using ubiquitous sensors was proposed to alleviate this problem. In this work, we present implementation and analysis results of a novel acoustic earpad sensor device to capture air-conducted vibrations of food chewing. In contrast to previous works, our new device reduces ear occlusion compared to laboratory setups by using wearable earpad headphones. We investigate the sensing principle, perform a spectral sound analysis, and compare food classification performance to a classic lab-based sensor setup. We present novel food texture clustering results for 19 foods, spurring the understanding of food texture structure. In addition, we detail findings of a recent exhibition installation, were 375 food samples were analysed using the new sensor prototype.

[1]  Zata M Vickers,et al.  Instrumental Acoustical Measures of Crispness in Foods. , 1985 .

[2]  J. Baerdemaeker,et al.  Principal component analysis of chewing sounds to detect differences in apple crispness , 2000 .

[3]  E Stellar,et al.  Chews and swallows and the microstructure of eating. , 1985, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  R. Hill,et al.  The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique , 2001, British Journal of Nutrition.

[5]  B. S. Burke.  The dietary history as a tool in research , 1947 .

[6]  R. Wing,et al.  Long-term weight loss maintenance. , 2005, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[7]  P. Lillford,et al.  The Materials Science of Eating and Food Breakdown , 2000 .

[8]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  Automatic Identification of Temporal Sequences in Chewing Sounds , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM 2007).

[9]  Birger Drake,et al.  Food Crushing Sounds. An Introductory Studya,b , 1963 .

[10]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  On-Body Sensing Solutions for Automatic Dietary Monitoring , 2009, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[11]  Oliver Amft,et al.  Ambient, On-Body, and Implantable Monitoring Technologies to Assess Dietary Behavior , 2011 .

[12]  Paul Lukowicz,et al.  Analysis of Chewing Sounds for Dietary Monitoring , 2005, UbiComp.

[13]  F Bellisle,et al.  Why should we study human food intake behaviour? , 2003, Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD.

[14]  J. Beasley,et al.  The pros and cons of using PDAs for dietary self-monitoring. , 2007, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[15]  Lora E Burke,et al.  Self-monitoring dietary intake: current and future practices. , 2005, Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation.

[16]  Karim Allaf,et al.  Characterization of brittle food products : Application of the acoustical emission method , 1996 .

[17]  Zata M Vickers.  FOOD SOUNDS: HOW MUCH INFORMATION DO THEY CONTAIN? , 1980 .

[18]  P. Eriksson,et al.  Head Movements during Chewing: Relation to Size and Texture of Bolus , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[19]  J. Dahan,et al.  Comparison of the Reproducibility of EMG Signals Recorded from Human Masseter and Lateral Pterygoid Muscles , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[20]  François Denis,et al.  A Protocol to Detect Local Affinities Involved in Proteins Distant Interactions , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM 2007).