ICTs in the Micro-Enterprise: An Examination of Usage, Benefits and Firm Growth in Hawaii's Agricultural Sector

Though there is an extensive body of research regarding information and communication technology (ICT) use in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), relatively few studies have examined ICT use specifically in the subset of SMEs known as micro-enterprises. This study compares ICT use among micro-enterprises (MEs) in the agricultural sector. Factors expected to influence IC adoption include firm size, CEO education, and the type of crop produced. Results indicate extensive use of computers and the Internet, especially for functions like email, online purchasing, and online business-related research, while website ownership is less widespread. Larger MEs are more likely than smaller ones to use a computer. Among those MEs owning computers, larger ones are more likely than smaller ones to have a website and to conduct financial activities online. However, most other ICTs (email, online purchasing, etc.) are used similarly by both smaller and larger MEs. Thus, for most internet ICTs micro-enterprise growth does not result in differing adoption rates. The study also investigates micro-enterprise use of emerging social technologies like instant messaging, chat, blogging, etc. Micro-entrepreneurs’ perceptions of ICT benefits and implications for development are also discussed. 2010). This paper follows SBA definition of SME and the EC definition for ME. Prior research suggests a number of factors influencing computer technology adoption in small businesses, including perceptions of benefits and customer needs (Beckinsale et al., 2006; Dholakia & Kshetri, 2004), lack of financial resources (Foong, 1999), lack of personnel with technical expertise (Beckinsale et al., 2006; Igbaria et al., 1998), the CEOs lack of experience with various ICTs (Palvia & Palvia, 1999), and participation in community-based web forums (Deakins et al., 2004). Firm size and age are factors common to many prior studies. While some results suggest that size and DOI: 10.4018/jeei.2011040104 40 International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2(2), 39-58, April-June 2011 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. age do affect ICT uptake (Teo, 2007; Haugh & Robson, 2005) others have found differently (Teo & Ranganathan, 2004). The mixed nature of prior results suggests a need to view SMEs from different perspectives. For instance, a preponderance of SME ICT research fails to distinguish MEs from larger SMEs. To be sure, a number of studies have examined ICT use in MEs, but even in these studies the primary perspective includes MEs as SMEs. The current study argues that MEs can be seen as being structurally and functionally different from their larger SME brethren. Furthermore, no prior research can be found to compare ICT adoption among MEs to determine whether smaller MEs adopt differently than larger MEs. This study seeks to bring clarity by introducing an integrated theoretical perspective explaining ICT acquisition and then by examining ICT adoption among MEs as distinct from larger SMEs, and by investigating whether the size of the ME determines different adoption patterns. Some research indicates that different industry factors can affect ICT adoption. Although no significant relationship was found between information intensity and likelihood of computer adoption, it was significantly related to extent of adoption (Thong, 1999). Other studies have found differences in the complexity of software applications adopted as a function of industry (Kagan et al., 1990). In other words, the characteristics of the industry sector a firm competes in likely affect the company’s technology use. For instance, MEs in manufacturing take up ICT use differently and for different reasons than those in retail services (Teo & Ranganathan, 2004), whose ICT use would be expected to differ from agricultural firms. Extending the same logic it seems reasonable to question whether ME agribusinesses producing different crops will exhibit different ICT usage patterns. Precisely because some research indicates industry differences in ICT usage, researchers must delve more deeply into individual industries, sectors, and sub-sectors to understand when and how differences pertain. Bharati and Chaudhury (2006) point out that while some studies have examined ICT adoption at the national level, relatively fewer have focused on the local level. For example, no studies to date have examined ICT adoption among Hawaii ME agribusinesses. This is an important issue since local and regional business factors can affect business development and practice. In that regard the current study examines MEs in the agricultural sector in a localized region, Hawaii. Agriculture is an important economic engine for Hawaii. Diversified agriculture in Hawaii constituted over 76% of Hawaii’s gross farm revenue in 2005. Fruits, vegetables, nuts, berries, floriculture, and greenhouse products accounted for $335,000,000 in revenues, about 67% of all Hawaii agricultural revenues in 2008 (USDA NASS, 2008). The sub-sectors examined specifically in this study (flowers, plants, fruits, vegetables, coffee and Macadamia nuts) comprised 65% of revenues from diversified agriculture in 2005 about half of all agriculture production (excluding foodprocessing). Historically agriculture employs approximately 5% of Hawaii’s workforce. Hence, diversified agriculture is a critical component of Hawaii’s agricultural economy and an important dimension of the state’s overall economy. As the dominance of pineapple and sugar industries fade from Hawaii’s economic spotlight, and the tourism market (the preeminent economic activity in Hawaii) continues to experience revenue declines, diversified agriculture may be an important contributor to economic sustainability in the near and longerterm future. Understanding development issues and opportunities facing Hawaii’s farming entrepreneurs is crucial to that progress. A number of newer internet-related ICTs, sometimes referred to as ‘social technologies’, have only recently exhibited growth in adoption. For example, instant messaging and chat have been around a while and appear to be popular modes of communication among younger people, but have yet to become established to the same extent in the broader business world. Use of even newer technologies like podcasting, 18 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/icts-microenterprise/55119?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Business, Administration, and Management. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2

[1]  P N O'Farrell,et al.  Alternative Theories of Small-Firm Growth: A Critical Review , 1988 .

[2]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  How Much Bandwidth Is Enough? A Longitudinal Examination of Media Characteristics and Group Outcomes , 1999, MIS Q..

[3]  E. Ramsey,et al.  E‐opportunities of service sector SMEs: an Irish cross‐border study , 2003 .

[4]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  R. Dholakia,et al.  Factors Impacting the Adoption of the Internet among SMEs , 2004 .

[6]  Carole Alcock,et al.  Factors affecting adoption of electronic commerce technologies by SMEs: an Australian study , 2003 .

[7]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[8]  H. Haugh,et al.  Are Scottish firms meeting the ICT challenge? Results from a National Survey of Enterprise , 2005 .

[9]  Georg Disterer,et al.  International case studies: To what extent is ICT infused into the operations of SMEs? , 2006, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[10]  Mike Metcalfe Development and oral technologies , 2007 .

[11]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Adopters and non-adopters of business-to-business electronic commerce in Singapore , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[12]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[13]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Analysis of Information Technology Success in Small Firms in New Zealand , 1998 .

[14]  Thompson S. H. Teo Organizational Characteristics, Modes of Internet Adoption and Their Impact: A Singapore Perspective , 2007, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[15]  Kin-Nam Lau,et al.  Information System usage within Small Business Firms , 1990 .

[16]  Gerard McElwee FARMERS AS ENTREPRENEURS: DEVELOPING COMPETITIVE SKILLS , 2006 .

[17]  J. Concato,et al.  A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  James Y. L. Thong,et al.  An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Kelly Burke The Impact of Firm Size on Internet Use in Small Businesses , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[20]  Ruay-Shiung Chang,et al.  Choosing Clouds for an Enterprise: Modeling and Evaluation , 2013, Int. J. E Entrepreneurship Innov..

[21]  Quey-Jen Yeh,et al.  Proliferation of computers among Taiwanese SMEs , 2007 .

[22]  S. Bruque,et al.  Organisational determinants of information technology adoption and implementation in SMEs: The case of family and cooperative firms , 2007 .

[23]  Abhijit Chaudhury,et al.  Studying the current status of technology adoption , 2006, CACM.

[24]  Cynthia K. Riemenschneider,et al.  Executive Decisions About Adoption of Information Technology in Small Business: Theory and Empirical Tests , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Information Technology Adoption by Small Businesses in Minority and Ethnic Communities , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[26]  Philip Powell,et al.  Exploring Internet Adoption Drivers in SMEs , 2006, Electron. Mark..

[27]  Marvin T. Batte,et al.  Changing computer use in agriculture: evidence from Ohio , 2004 .

[28]  Ulf Johansson,et al.  A qualitative investigation of smaller firm e-business development , 2004 .

[29]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[30]  Miguel López-Coronado,et al.  A model for the assessment and development of Internet-based information and communication services in small and medium enterprises , 2008 .

[31]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[32]  Martyn Warren,et al.  Farmers online: drivers and impediments in adoption of Internet in UK agricultural businesses , 2004 .

[33]  Kelly Burke,et al.  A Framework Describing the Relationships among Social Technologies and Social Capital Formation in Electronic Entrepreneurial Networking , 2009, Int. J. e Collab..

[34]  S. Foong Effect of End-User Personal and Systems Attributes on Computer-Based Information System Success in Malaysian SMEs , 1999 .

[35]  Antonio Padilla-Meléndez,et al.  Organizational factors affecting Internet technology adoption , 2006, Internet Res..

[36]  Shailendra C. Palvia,et al.  An examination of the IT satisfaction of small-business users , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[37]  David Deakins,et al.  ICT‐enabled collectivity as a positive rural business strategy , 2004 .

[38]  R. Duncombe Using the Livelihoods Framework to Analyze ICT Applications for Poverty Reduction through Microenterprise , 2007 .

[39]  Volker Wulf,et al.  IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[40]  J. Chacko,et al.  Information and communication technology and small, medium, and micro enterprises in Asia-Pacific—size does matter , 2006 .

[41]  Changsu Kim,et al.  Toward a diffusion model for Internet systems , 2004, Internet Res..

[42]  Albert Kagan Information systems implementation within US agribusiness: an applications approach , 2000 .