Greatest Challenges of Rectal Cancer Survivors: Results of a Population-Based Survey

BACKGROUND:Eliciting the priorities of cancer survivors is essential to address the specific needs of cancer survivor subgroups. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to describe the greatest challenges related to treatment for long-term rectal cancer survivors. DESIGN:This was an observational study with a cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS:The study included members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Northwest health plans. PATIENTS:A survey was mailed to long-term (≥5 years postdiagnosis) survivors of rectal cancer who had an anastomosis, temporary ostomy, or permanent ostomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The main outcome was measured with an open-ended question about the greatest challenge related to cancer surgery. We categorized responses using a grounded theory approach with double coding for reliability. Bonferroni-adjusted &khgr;2 values were used to assess differences in the proportions of subgroups who mentioned challenges within each response category. RESULTS:The survey completion rate was 61% (577/953); 76% (440/577) of participants responded to the greatest challenge question. The greatest challenges for respondents were bowel/ostomy management (reported by 44%), negative psychosocial effects (37%), late effects of treatment (21%), comorbidities and aging (13%), postoperative recovery (5%), and negative healthcare experiences (5%). Survivors with temporary ostomy or anastomosis were more likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report late effects (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01). Survivors with anastomosis were less likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report negative psychosocial impacts (p = 0.0001). LIMITATIONS:Generalizability is restricted by the lack of ethnically and racially diverse, uninsured (non-Medicare–eligible population), and non-English–speaking participants. Because the survey was cross-sectional and included respondents at different times since diagnosis, we could not adequately address changes in the greatest challenges over time. CONCLUSIONS:Our results reveal the need for bowel/ostomy management, psychosocial services, and surveillance for late effects in survivorship and supportive care services for all survivors of rectal cancer, regardless of ostomy status. The perspective of long-term survivors with anastomosis reveals challenges that may not be anticipated during decision making for treatment (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A254).

[1]  M. Hornbrook,et al.  Self‐reported depression and perceived financial burden among long‐term rectal cancer survivors , 2016, Psycho-Oncology.

[2]  P. Kind,et al.  Health-related quality of life after colorectal cancer in England: a patient-reported outcomes study of individuals 12 to 36 months after diagnosis. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  K. Stein,et al.  Current unmet needs of cancer survivors: Analysis of open‐ended responses to the American Cancer Society Study of Cancer Survivors II , 2015, Cancer.

[4]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  L. Temple,et al.  Reliability and validity of a survey to measure bowel function and quality of life in long-term rectal cancer survivors , 2014, Quality of Life Research.

[6]  L. Kao,et al.  Impact of Ileostomy-Related Complications on the Multidisciplinary Treatment of Rectal Cancer , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  J. Meyerhardt,et al.  Follow-up care, surveillance protocol, and secondary prevention measures for survivors of colorectal cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  F. Pucciani A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome , 2013, Updates in Surgery.

[9]  Y. Bar-Shavit,et al.  Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations , 2013, Techniques in Coloproctology.

[10]  Mark Hachey,et al.  Cancer Survivors in the United States: Prevalence across the Survivorship Trajectory and Implications for Care , 2013, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[11]  L. V. van de Poll-Franse,et al.  Quality of life of older rectal cancer patients is not impaired by a permanent stoma. , 2013, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  T. Eberl,et al.  Long‐term quality of life in pouch patients compared with stoma patients following rectal cancer surgery , 2011, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[13]  S. Green,et al.  Health-related quality of life among long-term rectal cancer survivors with an ostomy: manifestations by sex. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  M. Hornbrook,et al.  The Health-Related Quality of Life in Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Survivors Study: objectives, methods and patient sample , 2008, Current medical research and opinion.

[15]  M. Hornbrook,et al.  The greatest challenges reported by long-term colorectal cancer survivors with stomas. , 2008, The journal of supportive oncology.

[16]  M. Koller,et al.  Long-term Outcome after Colorectal Cancer Resection. Patients’ Self-Reported Quality of Life, Sexual Dysfunction and Surgeons’ Awareness of Patients’ needs , 2008, Tumori.

[17]  V. Fazio,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life for Abdominoperineal Excision of Rectum versus Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[18]  K. Bujko,et al.  Abdominoperineal resection or anterior resection for rectal cancer: patient preferences before and after treatment , 2006, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[19]  J. Bacik,et al.  The Development of a Validated Instrument to Evaluate Bowel Function After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer , 2005, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[20]  B. Kremer,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Quality of Life of Patients Receiving Either Abdominoperineal Resection or Sphincter-Preserving Procedure for Rectal Cancer , 2005, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  B. Ferrell,et al.  Revision and Psychometric Testing of the City of Hope Quality of Life–Ostomy Questionnaire , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[22]  H. Bernard,et al.  Techniques to Identify Themes , 2003 .

[23]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[25]  S. Gehlbach,et al.  The Duke–UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire: Measurement of Social Support in Family Medicine Patients , 1988, Medical care.

[26]  R. Shephard,et al.  A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. , 1969, Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport.

[27]  James D. Murphy,et al.  Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2015. , 2015, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[28]  L. Temple,et al.  Functional consequences of colorectal cancer management. , 2014, Surgical oncology clinics of North America.

[29]  S. Edge,et al.  Survivorship: introduction and definition. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. , 2014, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[30]  T. Buskirk,et al.  The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors , 2007, Cancer.

[31]  H. Buhr,et al.  Effect of Anastomosis Level on Continence Performance and Quality of Life after Colonic J-pouch Reconstruction , 2007, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[32]  E. Feuer,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 , 2006 .

[33]  J. Pachler,et al.  Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.