Developing an individual and collective self-efficacy scale for the teaching of writing in high schools

Abstract The study reported on here focuses on self-efficacy in relation to high-school teachers’ teaching of writing. 140 New Zealand teachers from four schools completed a teacher-of-writing self-efficacy scale (TWSES) based on a rhetorical model of the writing process and incorporating five hypothesized dimensions. An initial principal components analysis was undertaken on 25 individual self-efficacy items to investigate the dimensionality of the data and the extent to which it reflected the dimensions hypothesized. A two-component solution emerged, termed “pre-writing instructional strategies” (accounting for 52% of total variance) and “compositional strategy demonstration” (7% of variance). Further principal components analyses conducted on groups of items deemed to be thematically coherent, that loaded on each component, confirmed that the data set for each group, treated separately to any other items, was approximately uni-dimensional. Measurement scales were calibrated to each group of items, and served as the dependent variables for comparisons of teachers’ self-efficacy in different subjects. Statistically significant variations occurred in the resultant scale locations for teachers of English, the humanities, science and mathematics. The study findings have implications for the teaching of writing as conceptualized in the secondary school, and indicate a value in viewing disciplinary literacies in rhetorical terms.

[1]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  Fostering Student Learning: The Relationship of Collective Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement , 2004 .

[2]  Candia Morgan The place of pupil writing in learning, teaching and assessing mathematics , 2001 .

[3]  Myron H. Dembo,et al.  Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. , 1984 .

[4]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure , 1998 .

[5]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[6]  P. Hitchcock Infusing effective literacy practice within secondary school disciplines , 2012 .

[7]  Carl W. Swartz,et al.  Goals and Progress Feedback: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Writing Achievement , 1993 .

[8]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Fundamentals of Item Response Theory , 1991 .

[9]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[10]  S. Graham,et al.  Teacher Efficacy in Writing: A Construct Validation With Primary Grade Teachers , 2001 .

[11]  E. Moje Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change , 2008 .

[12]  J. Hayes A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. , 1996 .

[13]  Roselmina Indrisano,et al.  Disciplinary Literacy and Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2013 .

[14]  F. Samejima Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores , 1968 .

[15]  T. Locke,et al.  New Zealand teachers respond to the ‘National Writing Project’ experience , 2011 .

[16]  Robert Vanderburg Reviewing Research on Teaching Writing Based on Vygotsky's Theories: What We Can Learn , 2006 .

[17]  Frank Pajares,et al.  SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS, MOTIVATION, AND ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 2003 .

[18]  Michael J. Bossé,et al.  Learning and Assessing Mathematics through Reading and Writing. , 2008 .

[19]  J. Hayes,et al.  The Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem. , 1980 .

[20]  Brian Hand,et al.  Examining Arguments Generated by Year 5, 7, and 10 Students in Science Classrooms , 2010 .

[21]  Frank Pajares,et al.  Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing , 1997 .

[22]  Richard Andrews Rebirth of Rhetoric: Essays in Language, Culture and Education , 1992 .

[23]  E. Skaalvik,et al.  Dimensions of Teacher Self-Efficacy and Relations with Strain Factors, Perceived Collective Teacher Efficacy, and Teacher Burnout. , 2007 .

[24]  Andy Cavagnetto,et al.  The Nature of Elementary Student Science Discourse in the Context of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach , 2010 .

[25]  Elena Xeni,et al.  Developing writing teachers: practical ways for teacher-writers to transform their classroom practice , 2015 .

[26]  Virginia M. C. Tze,et al.  Teacher Efficacy Research 1998–2009: Signs of Progress or Unfulfilled Promise? , 2011 .

[27]  R. Goddard,et al.  A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools , 2001 .

[28]  Karen F. Parker,et al.  Collective teacher efficacy, pupil attainment and socio-economic status in primary school® , 2006 .

[29]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[30]  Aviva Freedman,et al.  Learning and Teaching Genre , 1994 .

[31]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[32]  T. Shanahan,et al.  Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content- Area Literacy , 2008 .

[33]  M. Halliday,et al.  Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective , 1989 .

[34]  Roz Ivanǐ Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write , 2004 .

[35]  Heather C. Camp The psychology of writing development—And its implications for assessment , 2012 .

[36]  A. Bandura GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTING SELF-EFFICACY SCALES , 2006 .

[37]  Steve Graham,et al.  Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. , 2007 .

[38]  T. Locke,et al.  The Impact of "Writing Project" Professional Development on Teachers' Self-Efficacy as Writers and Teachers of Writing. , 2013 .