Assessing crash risk considering vehicle interactions with trucks using point detector data.

Trucks have distinct driving characteristics in general traffic streams such as lower speeds and limitations in acceleration and deceleration. As a consequence, vehicles keep longer headways or frequently change lane when they follow a truck, which is expected to increase crash risk. This study introduces several traffic measures at the individual vehicle level to capture vehicle interactions between trucks and non-trucks and analyzed how the measures affect crash risk under different traffic conditions. The traffic measures were developed using headways obtained from Inductive Loop Detectors (ILDs). In addition, a truck detection algorithm using a Gaussian Mixture (GM) model was developed to identify trucks and to estimate truck exposure from ILD data. Using the identified vehicle types from the GM model, vehicle interaction metrics were categorized into three groups based on the combination of leading and following vehicle types. The effects of the proposed traffic measures on crash risk were modeled in two different cases of prior- and non-crash using a case-control approach utilizing a conditional logistic regression. Results showed that the vehicle interactions between the leading and following vehicle types were highly associated with crash risk, and further showed different impacts on crash risk by traffic conditions. Specifically, crashes were more likely to occur when a truck following a non-truck had shorter average headway but greater headway variance in heavy traffic while a non-truck following a truck had greater headway variance in light traffic. This study obtained meaningful conclusions that vehicle interactions involved with trucks were significantly related to the crash likelihood rather than the measures that estimate average traffic condition such as total volume or average headway of the traffic stream.

[1]  Wilfred W Recker,et al.  Freeway safety as a function of traffic flow. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Herbert Yoo,et al.  DRIVER BEHAVIOR WHILE FOLLOWING CARS, TRUCKS, AND BUSES , 1999 .

[3]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Congestion and Safety: A Spatial Analysis of London , 2003 .

[4]  J. Buring,et al.  Epidemiology in Medicine , 1987 .

[5]  David W. Eby,et al.  EXPLORING REAR-END ROADWAY CRASHES FROM THE DRIVER'S PERSPECTIVE , 1998 .

[6]  Wei Wang,et al.  Predicting crash likelihood and severity on freeways with real-time loop detector data. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Fan Ye,et al.  Vehicle Type–Specific Headway Analysis Using Freeway Traffic Data , 2009 .

[9]  Chris Lee,et al.  Analysis of Crash Precursors on Instrumented Freeways , 2002 .

[10]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Congestion and Safety on Highways: Towards an Analytical Model , 1997 .

[11]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Speed as a risk factor in serious run-off-road crashes: Bayesian case-control analysis with case speed uncertainty , 2006 .

[12]  Cheol Oh,et al.  Real-Time Estimation of Accident Likelihood for Safety Enhancement , 2005 .

[13]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[14]  Benjamin Coifman,et al.  Speed Estimation and Length Based Vehicle Classification from Freeway Single Loop Detectors , 2009 .

[15]  Chao Wang,et al.  Road Traffic Congestion and Crash Severity: Econometric Analysis Using Ordered Response Models , 2010 .

[16]  S. Lewallen,et al.  Epidemiology in practice: case-control studies. , 1998, Community eye health.

[17]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Understanding the Dynamics of Heavy Vehicle Interactions in Car-Following , 2012 .

[18]  Matthew G Karlaftis,et al.  Identifying crash type propensity using real-time traffic data on freeways. , 2011, Journal of safety research.

[19]  Stephen G. Ritchie,et al.  Multiple-Classifier Systems for Truck Body Classification at WIM Sites with Inductive Signature Data , 2015 .

[20]  Junhua Wang,et al.  Utilizing the eigenvectors of freeway loop data spatiotemporal schematic for real time crash prediction. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  K. Schulz,et al.  Compared to what? Finding controls for case-control studies , 2005, The Lancet.

[22]  M Hijar,et al.  Risk factors in highway traffic accidents: a case control study. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Edward C. Sullivan Estimating Accident Benefits of Reduced Freeway Congestion , 1990 .

[24]  Xuedong Yan,et al.  Analyses of Rear-End Crashes Based on Classification Tree Models , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[25]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  Impact of traffic oscillations on freeway crash occurrences. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  N. E. Breslow Statistical Methods in Cancer Research , 1986 .

[27]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Estimation of Truck Traffic Volume from Single Loop Detectors with Lane-to-Lane Speed Correlation , 2003 .

[28]  John Hourdos,et al.  Real-Time Detection of Crash-Prone Conditions at Freeway High Crash Locations , 2006 .

[29]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Bayesian Updating Approach for Real-Time Safety Evaluation with Automatic Vehicle Identification Data , 2012 .

[30]  Amelia C. Regan,et al.  Traffic Conditions and Truck Accidents on Urban Freeways , 2004 .

[31]  Yinhai Wang,et al.  Dynamic Estimation of Freeway Large-Truck Volumes Based on Single-Loop Measurements , 2004, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[32]  Frank Gross,et al.  Case-control analysis in highway safety: Accounting for sites with multiple crashes. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Pengcheng Zhang,et al.  Behavior-based analysis of freeway car-truck interactions and related mitigation strategies , 2005 .