Working memory for temporal and nontemporal events in monkeys.

This is the first report that introduces appropriate behavioral tasks for monkeys for investigations of working memory for temporal and nontemporal events. Using several behavioral tests, the study also shows how temporal information is coded during retention intervals in the tasks. Each of three monkeys was trained with two working memory tasks: delayed matching-to-sample of stimulus duration (DMS-D) and delayed matching-to-sample of stimulus color (DMS-C). The two tasks employed an identical apparatus and responses and differed only in the temporal and nontemporal attribute of the stimuli to be retained for correct performance. When a retention interval between the sample and comparison stimuli was prolonged, the monkeys made more incorrect responses to short samples in the DMS-C task, suggesting "trace decay" of memory for short stimuli. However, the same monkeys showed no such increase in incorrect responses to short samples in the DMS-D task, suggesting active coding of temporal information, that is, the length of stimulus duration, during the retention interval. When variable lengths of samples were presented with a fixed retention interval, the monkeys made more incorrect responses when length differences between short and long samples were small in the DMS-D task, but not in the DMS-C task. This suggests that the codes of working memory retained in the DMS-D task were not absolute (analogical) but rather were relative (categorical) and related to differences in the duration of the samples.

[1]  William A. Roberts,et al.  Short-term memory in the pigeon: Effects of repetition and spacing. , 1972 .

[2]  D. S. Grant,et al.  Effects of sample duration and spaced repetition upon delayed matching-to-sample in monkeys (Macaca arctoides andSaimiri sciureus) , 1977 .

[3]  Donald M. Wilkie,et al.  Subjective shortening: A model of pigeons' memory for event duration. , 1983 .

[4]  M. Spetch Systematic errors in pigeons’ memory for event duration: Interaction between training and test delay , 1987 .

[5]  M. Spetch,et al.  Proactive Effects in Pigeons' Memory for Event Duration: Evidence for Analogical Retention , 1989 .

[6]  M. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons’ memory for event duration: Intertrial interval and delay effects , 1989 .

[7]  D. Wilkie,et al.  Discriminal distance analysis supports the hypothesis that pigeons retrospectively encode event duration , 1990 .

[8]  D. S. Grant,et al.  Pigeons' memory for event duration: Differences between choice and successive matching tasks , 1991 .

[9]  D. Shurtleff,et al.  Intertrial-interval effects on sensitivity (A') and response bias (B") in a temporal discrimination by rats. , 1992, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  Memory codes for temporal and nontemporal samples in many-to-one matching by pigeons , 1993 .

[11]  A. Santi,et al.  Memory for event duration in rats , 1995 .

[12]  The Role of Minimum Wait Time and Sample Discriminability in the Coding of Event Duration in Pigeons , 1996 .

[13]  Y. Sakurai,et al.  Hippocampal and neocortical cell assemblies encode memory processes for different types of stimuli in the rat , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  Pigeons’ memory for event duration: Differences between visual and auditory signals , 1998 .

[15]  Y. Sakurai Elemental, configurai, and sequential memory processes in the rat can be tested in a single situation in one day , 1999, Psychobiology.

[16]  Y. Sakurai How do cell assemblies encode information in the brain? , 1999, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[17]  Shintaro Funahashi,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of executive control by the prefrontal cortex , 2001, Neuroscience Research.

[18]  Neurobiology. Working memory helps the mind focus. , 2001, Science.

[19]  Working Memory Helps the Mind Focus , 2001, Science.