The reliability of evidence review methodology in environmental science and conservation

[1]  D. Gough,et al.  An Introduction to Systematic Reviews , 2017 .

[2]  Anders Grimvall,et al.  How effective are created or restored freshwater wetlands for nitrogen and phosphorus removal? A systematic review , 2013, Environmental Evidence.

[3]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  Wei Li,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period , 2015 .

[5]  J. Newman,et al.  Do on-farm natural, restored, managed and constructed wetlands mitigate agricultural pollution in Great Britain and Ireland?: a systematic review , 2015 .

[6]  William J Sutherland,et al.  Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  Gary Bilotta,et al.  On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies , 2014 .

[8]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Evaluating and improving the reliability of evidence syntheses in conservation and environmental science: A methodology , 2014 .

[9]  Christopher J. Lortie,et al.  Formalized synthesis opportunities for ecology: systematic reviews and meta‐analyses , 2014 .

[10]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Uses and misuses of meta‐analysis in plant ecology , 2014 .

[11]  Günther K. H. Zupanc.  Impact beyond the impact factor , 2013, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  Yola Georgiadou,et al.  Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science - policy interface , 2013 .

[13]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  20. Quality Standards for Research Syntheses , 2013 .

[14]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution , 2013 .

[15]  Marc Hockings,et al.  Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  A. Pullin,et al.  Science informing Policy – a health warning for the environment , 2012, Environmental Evidence.

[17]  Marco Pautasso,et al.  Publication Growth in Biological Sub-Fields: Patterns, Predictability and Sustainability , 2012 .

[18]  David Makowski,et al.  Assessment of the quality of meta-analysis in agronomy , 2012 .

[19]  Eric Biber.  Which Science - Whose Science - How Scientific Disciplines Can Shape Environmental Law , 2011 .

[20]  Brittany E. Huntington.  Confronting publication bias in marine reserve meta‐analyses , 2011 .

[21]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  Amelia Sharman,et al.  Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence gathering? Biofuels, the EU and the 10% target† , 2010 .

[23]  Bilal M. Ayyub,et al.  On uncertainty in information and ignorance in knowledge , 2010, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[24]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[25]  Conflict of interest in research on anthropogenic noise and marine mammals: Does funding bias conclusions? , 2010 .

[26]  C. A. Howell,et al.  How can we improve information delivery to support conservation and restoration decisions? , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[27]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Temperate marine reserves: global ecological effects and guidelines for future networks , 2009 .

[28]  Maxwell L. King,et al.  Measuring research quality using the journal impact factor, citations and ‘Ranked Journals’: blunt instruments or inspired metrics? , 2009 .

[29]  Jeremy Grimshaw,et al.  AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[31]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process , 2009, ECIS.

[32]  Carlos Valle,et al.  Marine reserves: size and age do matter. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[33]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[34]  J. Popay,et al.  Synthesizing Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods , 2007 .

[35]  J. Pielke.  The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .

[36]  A. Pullin,et al.  Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[37]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine , 2006 .

[38]  D. Sarewitz.  How science makes environmental controversies worse , 2004 .

[39]  A. Pullin,et al.  Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? , 2004 .

[40]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[41]  Iain Chalmers,et al.  Trying to do more Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations , 2003 .

[42]  L. Hedges,et al.  A Brief History of Research Synthesis , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[43]  Ricard Guerrero.  Misuse and abuse of journal "impact factors" , 2002 .

[44]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public Health , 2001 .

[45]  D. Cook,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[46]  C. Mulrow.  The medical review article: state of the science. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[47]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[48]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .