Dealing with pollution from conflict: Analysis of discourses around the 2006 Lebanon oil spill.

In July 2006 a war between Lebanon and Israel resulted in severe environmental damage in Lebanon from Israeli bombing raids. An attack on the Lebanese Jiyyeh Power Plant released 15,000 tons of heavy fuel oil into the Mediterranean Sea. Remarkably, a clean-up operation was effected despite a continued state of war and lack of capacity in the Lebanese government. Civil society environmentalists played a key role in dealing with the pollution and complying with pollution-control legislation. In this study we use Q-methodology to analyse discourses on the effectiveness of pollution legislation during times of conflict using the Jiyyeh oil spill as an example. We interviewed 35 people from eight different stakeholder groups involved in environmental issues. Five distinct discourses were generated covering compensation schemes, need for new legislation, role of stakeholders during wartime and strengthening government ministries.

[1]  David Ockwell,et al.  ‘Opening up’ policy to reflexive appraisal: a role for Q Methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia , 2008 .

[2]  Bruce McKeown,et al.  The Forced-Free Distinction in Q Technique: A Note on Unused Categories in the Q Sort Continuum , 1980, Operant Subjectivity.

[3]  F. Bou-Rabee,et al.  Environmental and health consequences of depleted uranium use in the 1991 Gulf War. , 2004, Environment international.

[4]  Sofia Frantzi,et al.  Exploring discourses on international environmental regime effectiveness with Q methodology: a case study of the Mediterranean Action Plan. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  A. H. Westing.  Ecological consequences of the Second Indochina War , 1976 .

[6]  Ann Hooker Clarke,et al.  Understanding sustainable development in the context of other emergent environmental perspectives , 2002 .

[7]  C. Papastefanou.  DEPLETED URANIUM IN MILITARY CONFLICTS AND THE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT , 2002, Health physics.

[8]  Russell Mannion,et al.  Q methodology in health economics , 2006, Journal of health services research & policy.

[9]  K E Dennis,et al.  Weight control self-efficacy types and transitions affect weight-loss outcomes in obese women. , 1996, Addictive behaviors.

[10]  John Barry,et al.  Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology , 1999 .

[11]  John L. R. Proops,et al.  Social discourse and environmental policy : an application of Q methodology , 2000 .

[12]  Unced.  Rio Declaration on Environment and Development , 1992 .

[13]  D. Ehrenfeld.  The Lessons of Valdez , 1990 .

[14]  W. Stephenson.  The study of behavior : Q-technique and its methodology , 1955 .

[15]  Dan Durning,et al.  Policy analysts' roles and value orientations: An empirical investigation using Q methodology , 1994 .

[16]  M el-Fadel,et al.  Industrial-waste management in developing countries: the case of Lebanon. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  Jack Block,et al.  A Comparison of the Forced and Unforced Q-Sorting Procedures , 1956 .

[18]  P. Stenner,et al.  Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation , 2005 .

[19]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Reconstructive Democratic Theory , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[20]  P. Richards.  No Peace No War: An Anthropology of Contemporary Armed Conflicts , 2004 .

[21]  M. Sadiq,et al.  The Gulf War Aftermath: An Environmental Tragedy , 1993 .

[22]  Victor W. Sidel,et al.  War and public health , 1997 .

[23]  Steven R. Brown.  Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. , 1980 .

[24]  Elard.  Lebanon : rapid environmental assessment for greening recovery, reconstruction and reform : 2006 , 2007 .

[25]  K. Mäler.  International Environmental Problems , 1990 .

[26]  R. Cross.  Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. , 2004, Health education research.