Macroscopic susceptibility in ultra high field MRI. II: acquisition of spin echo images from the human head.

The presence of magnetic susceptibility can lead to substantial geometric distortions when imaging the human head at 8 T. These are particularly significant in gradient echo images where susceptibility often results in a noticeable loss of MR signal in the temporal lobe, the frontal lobe, and the paranasal sinus regions. In this work, anterior coronal gradient and spin echo images were acquired from the frontal lobe and sinus regions. The spin echo was shown to significantly overcome the loss of signal observed in the corresponding gradient echo images, resulting in data of greatly increased quality. In conclusion, whereas susceptibility artifacts are significant in ultra high field MRI, they can be largely surmounted by using spin echo techniques, as had been previously demonstrated in studies at lower field strength.

[1]  R E Bailey,et al.  Design and assembly of an 8 tesla whole-body MR scanner. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  A. Kangarlu,et al.  Human magnetic resonance imaging at 8 T , 1998, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  P. Röschmann,et al.  Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. , 1985, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  D C Noll,et al.  MR imaging of lung parenchyma: a solution to susceptibility. , 1992, Radiology.

[5]  P. Robitaille,et al.  On RF power and dielectric resonances in UHF MRI , 1999, NMR in biomedicine.

[6]  A. Kangarlu,et al.  Human leptomeningeal and cortical vascular anatomy of the cerebral cortex at 8 Tesla. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[8]  A. Kangarlu,et al.  Acquisition of human multislice MR images at 8 Tesla. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  P. Robitaille Response to ‘Does RF brain heating decrease at 8 T’ , 1999, NMR in biomedicine.

[10]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  NMR imaging in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities and gradient field nonlinearities. , 1985, Medical physics.

[11]  T. Mosher,et al.  Removal of local field gradient artifacts in T2*‐weighted images at high fields by gradient‐echo slice excitation profile imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  K Farahani,et al.  Effect of field strength on susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1990, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[13]  T. Ibrahim,et al.  Dielectric resonance phenomena in ultra high field MRI. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  A. Kangarlu,et al.  RF penetration in ultra high field MRI: challenges in visualizing details within the center of the human brain. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  J. Frahm,et al.  Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  P. Robitaille,et al.  Macroscopic susceptibility in ultra high field MRI. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  J C Gore,et al.  On the relative importance of paramagnetic relaxation and diffusion‐mediated susceptibility losses in tissues , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.