3D printing-assisted design of scaffold structures

Rapid prototyping has emerged as a very auspicious manufacturing method of fabricating tissue engineering scaffolds. Using a 3D CAD design, the 3D printer features the ability of producing the predetermined forms and structures with very high level of accuracy and repeatability. Additionally, the 3D-printed tissue scaffolds are meant to act as replaceable constructs in a very demanding environment. The challenging conditions of the human body set high criteria demands that the scaffold should be capable of fulfilling. One of the most crucial demands is the capability of the scaffold to exhibit the desired mechanical properties depending on the loading conditions that it must cope up against. A mechanical property investigation of different scaffold designs can provide crucial information concerning this key factor in the criteria profile of a functional scaffold design. The target of the present study is to compare the mechanical properties of different scaffold designs that, however, feature same porosity and similar dimensions. Compressive strength testing was conducted in three 3D-printed scaffold designs. Also, a finite element study was conducted, simulating the compressive strength testing. The results of the compression testing experiment were found to be in good agreement with the computational analysis results. Furthermore, a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation was conducted in order to look into the fluid shear stress inside the scaffold. Finally, the properties of the biomaterial hydroxyapatite were used in order to investigate the compressive and shear mechanical behavior of the aforementioned designs by conducting a finite element study.

[1]  Binil Starly,et al.  Creation of a unit block library of architectures for use in assembled scaffold engineering , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  Hu Rui,et al.  Mechanical properties of porous titanium with different distributions of pore size , 2013 .

[3]  Paulo Jorge Da Silva bartolo,et al.  Numerical simulations of bioextruded polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering applications , 2013 .

[4]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[5]  K. Leong,et al.  Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[6]  R. Bagheri,et al.  Effect of pore geometry and loading direction on deformation mechanism of rapid prototyped scaffolds , 2012 .

[7]  Fabien Guillemot,et al.  Cell patterning technologies for organotypic tissue fabrication. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[8]  J. Planell,et al.  Role of porosity and pore architecture in the in vivo bone regeneration capacity of biodegradable glass scaffolds. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[9]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[10]  Clemens A van Blitterswijk,et al.  Effects of the architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds on cell seeding and culturing. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  Shuping Peng,et al.  Fabrication of porous polyvinyl alcohol scaffold for bone tissue engineering via selective laser sintering , 2013, Biofabrication.

[12]  Wenguang Zhang,et al.  Fabrication and compressive properties of Ti6Al4V implant with honeycomb‐like structure for biomedical applications , 2010 .

[13]  Jan Wieding,et al.  The Effect of Structural Design on Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response of Additive Manufactured Titanium Scaffolds , 2012, Materials.

[14]  Shivakumar Raman,et al.  Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM). , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[15]  C A van Blitterswijk,et al.  3D fiber-deposited scaffolds for tissue engineering: influence of pores geometry and architecture on dynamic mechanical properties. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[16]  L. Gibson Biomechanics of cellular solids. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Patrick Vermette,et al.  Bioreactors for tissue mass culture: design, characterization, and recent advances. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[18]  Colleen L Flanagan,et al.  Experimental and computational characterization of designed and fabricated 50:50 PLGA porous scaffolds for human trabecular bone applications , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[19]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Development of a Tissue Engineering Scaffold Structure Library for Rapid Prototyping. Part 1: Investigation and Classification , 2003 .

[20]  F. Boschetti,et al.  Prediction of the micro-fluid dynamic environment imposed to three-dimensional engineered cell systems in bioreactors. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Fernando Guiberteau,et al.  Finite element modeling as a tool for predicting the fracture behavior of robocast scaffolds. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[22]  J. Ai,et al.  Preparation of a biomimetic nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering via mineralization of gelatin hydrogel and study of mineral transformation in simulated body fluid. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[23]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Fabrication of customised scaffolds using computer‐aided design and rapid prototyping techniques , 2005 .

[24]  E. Charrière,et al.  Mechanical characterization of brushite and hydroxyapatite cements. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[25]  D. Karalekas,et al.  Experimental evaluation of hardening strains in a bioceramic material using an embedded optical sensor , 2015 .

[26]  Donald V. Rosato,et al.  Plastics Engineered Product Design , 2003 .

[27]  Yaron Blinder,et al.  Modeling of flow‐induced shear stress applied on 3D cellular scaffolds: Implications for vascular tissue engineering , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  Hyoun‐Ee Kim,et al.  Hydroxyapatite porous scaffold engineered with biological polymer hybrid coating for antibiotic Vancomycin release , 2005, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[29]  M. Kamali,et al.  A Porous Hydroxyapatite/Gelatin Nanocomposite Scaffold for Bone Tissue Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation , 2012, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[30]  Shuping Peng,et al.  Characterization of Mechanical and Biological Properties of 3-D Scaffolds Reinforced with Zinc Oxide for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  Lei Shi,et al.  Preparation and characterization of nanosilver-doped porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds , 2015 .

[32]  Hong-Ru Lin,et al.  Porous alginate/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: preparation, characterization, and in vitro studies. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[33]  Shaun Eshraghi,et al.  Mechanical and microstructural properties of polycaprolactone scaffolds with one-dimensional, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional orthogonally oriented porous architectures produced by selective laser sintering. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[34]  Eduardo Saiz,et al.  Sintering and robocasting of beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for orthopaedic applications. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[35]  M. A. d’Ávila,et al.  Influence of Hydroxyapatite on Extruded 3D Scaffolds , 2013 .