Employee involvement and participation: developing the concept of institutional embeddedness using WERS2004

It is widely accepted that employee involvement and participation (EIP) is a key component of the high commitment bundle of HRM, but that it can take a range of forms in practice. Much of the analysis to date has either treated different forms of EIP as a single construct or has measured EIP by virtue of its presence or absence alone. Drawing on earlier work based on the data from WERS1998 examining the link between various forms of EIP and employee outcomes such as job satisfaction and organisational commitment, the authors re-apply and extend these ideas to data from WERS2004. In particular they develop the concept of institutional embeddedness, in order argue that both the depth and breadth of EIP have important associations with commitment though not with satisfaction. This association held for workplaces employing 25 or more workers, and here it was apparent that the more that employees are involved at workplace level – through a wider number of EIP practices that are held more frequently and include opportunities for workers to have their say – the more likely it is that investments in EIP will reap the reward of organisational commitment. For smaller establishments, given that they tend to operate with relatively few formal schemes, it is likely that managers in these workplaces find alternative ways in which to engage the workforce, and that informal EIP offer similar levels of embeddedness in these situations. A clear implication to be drawn from the findings is that, in a context of lower levels of formality within organisations (large and small), line managers are more than ever the key link between HR policy and the embodiment of actual practice at the workplace.

[1]  Size of Industrial Organization and Worker Behaviour , 1973 .

[2]  B. Wilpert,et al.  Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: a critical evaluation. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Thomas G. Gunn Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage , 1987 .

[5]  Adrian John Wilkinson,et al.  NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT , 1991 .

[6]  Giacomo Mauro DAriano,et al.  Employee Involvement: Methods for Improving Performance and Work Attitudes , 1993 .

[7]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application , 1997 .

[8]  Paul E. Spector Job satisfaction: application, assessment, cause, and consequences , 1997 .

[9]  Philip Stiles,et al.  Human resource management on the line , 1997 .

[10]  Mari Sako,et al.  The nature and impact of employee 'voice' in the European car components industry , 1998 .

[11]  Paul J. Kobulnicky,et al.  Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application , 1998 .

[12]  A. Bryson The impact of employee involvement on small firms' financial performance , 1999, National Institute Economic Review.

[13]  M. C. de Witte New forms of work organisation: Can Europe realise its potential? , 1999 .

[14]  Hettie A. Richardson,et al.  The Impact of High Involvement Work Processes on Organizational Effectiveness , 1999 .

[15]  M. C. de Witte,et al.  Boekbespreking van EPOC Research Group, 1997, New forms of work organisation: can Europe realise its potential?, Dublin: European Foundation of Living and Working Conditions , 1999 .

[16]  M. Marchington,et al.  'Best practice' human resource management: perfect opportunity or dangerous illusion? , 2000 .

[17]  Dora Scholarios,et al.  Employees and High-PerformanceWork Systems:Testinginside the Black Box , 2000 .

[18]  Clive Belfield,et al.  Updating the Determinants of Firm Performance: Estimation using the 1998 UK Workplace Employee Relations Survey , 2001 .

[19]  Monder Ram,et al.  The Dynamics of Informality: Employment Relations in Small Firms and the Effects of Regulatory Change , 2001 .

[20]  Mark Fenton‐O'Creevy Employee involvement and the middle manager: saboteur or scapegoat? , 2001 .

[21]  Rick Delbridge,et al.  Employee Perceptions of Job Influence and Organizational Participation Employee Perceptions , 2001 .

[22]  J. Shields,et al.  In Search of the Subject: Researching Employee Reactions to Human Resource Management , 2002 .

[23]  D. Guest Human Resource Management, Corporate Performance and Employee Wellbeing: Building the Worker into HRM , 2002 .

[24]  Neil Conway,et al.  Communicating the psychological contract: an employer perspective , 2002 .

[25]  Juani Swart,et al.  Understanding the people and performance link: Unlocking the black box , 2003 .

[26]  Mick Marchington,et al.  Devolving HR responsibility to the line: threat, opportunity or partnership? , 2003 .

[27]  Monder Ram,et al.  Praising Caesar Not Burying Him: What We Know about Employment Relations in Small Firms , 2003 .

[28]  H. V. Emmerik,et al.  Social embeddedness and job performance of tenured and non-tenured professionals , 2004 .

[29]  M. Handel,et al.  Editors' Introduction: The Effects of New Work Practices on Workers , 2004 .

[30]  Tony Dundon,et al.  The meanings and purpose of employee voice , 2004 .

[31]  Jone L. Pearce,et al.  The employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives. , 2004 .

[32]  Alex Bryson,et al.  Managerial Responsiveness to Union and Nonunion Worker Voice in Britain , 2004 .

[33]  J. Storey Adding Value Through Information and Consultation , 2005 .

[34]  Fiona Edgar,et al.  HRM practice and employee attitudes: different measures – different results , 2005 .

[35]  H. Bewley,et al.  Inside the Workplace: First Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey , 2005 .

[36]  P. Willman,et al.  Adding value through information and consultation , 2005 .

[37]  Participation and Democracy at Work: Essays in Honour of Harvie Ramsay , 2005 .

[38]  Mick Marchington,et al.  Employee Involvement: patterns and explanations , 2005 .

[39]  John Forth,et al.  Inside the workplace: first findings from the 2004 workplace employment relations survey (WERS 2004) , 2005 .

[40]  The Effects of New Work Practices on Workers , 2006 .

[41]  Tony Dundon,et al.  Capturing Complexity: Developing an Integrated Approach to Analysing HRM in SMEs , 2006 .

[42]  T. Dundon,et al.  Conceptualizing the Dynamics of Employee Information and Consultation: Evidence from the Republic of Ireland , 2006 .

[43]  H. Bewley,et al.  Small and medium-sized enterprises: findings from the 2004 Workplace Employee Relations Survey , 2006 .

[44]  Mick Marchington,et al.  Embedding employee involvement and participation at work , 2006 .

[45]  P. Mahadevan,et al.  An overview , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[46]  Sue Hutchinson,et al.  Front‐line managers as agents in the HRM‐performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence , 2007 .

[47]  Mick Marchington,et al.  Embedding the provision of information and consultation in the workplace , 2007 .

[48]  R. ChittendenFandOakey,et al.  The Department of Trade and Industry , 2007 .

[49]  The process of engagement and alignment: improving health through human resource management , 2008 .

[50]  M. Marchington,et al.  IMPROVING HEALTH THROUGH HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT The process of engagement and alignment , 2008 .