Steered molecular dynamics studies of the potential of mean force for peptide amphiphile self-assembly into cylindrical nanofibers.

Steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations were applied to determine the potential of mean force for the self-assembly of peptide amphiphile (PA) nanofibers, specifically considering a single PA adding to a growing cylindrical nanofiber at 310 K. It is found that the free energy, enthalpy, and entropy differences for this assembly process are -67 kcal/mol, -71.5 kcal/ml, and -14.5 cal/(mol K), respectively, and therefore that enthalpy provides the driving force for self-assembly to form a fiber. A pairwise interaction analysis shows that both electrostatic and van der Waals interactions play important roles in the self-assembly process, with the van der Waals interaction being the larger effect. The mechanistic picture that emerges from this work is that as the PA is pulled from the fiber, the interaction evolves through three stages: (1) initially electrostatic interactions between the charged head of the pulled PA and other PAs, and between the pulled PA and solvent are dominant, (2) after the charged head emerges, the rest of the peptide comes out, with both PA-solvent electrostatic interactions and van der Waals interactions being significant, and (3) in the last step, the alkane tail emerges, dominated by van der Waals interactions with either peptide or solvent.

[1]  Jianwei He,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics simulations on the binding of the appendant structure and helix-β2 in domain-swapped human cystatin C dimer , 2012, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[2]  George C Schatz,et al.  Modeling the self-assembly of peptide amphiphiles into fibers using coarse-grained molecular dynamics. , 2012, Nano letters.

[3]  S. Rowan,et al.  Supramolecular gels formed from multi-component low molecular weight species. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[4]  Hui Lu,et al.  Mechanically untying a protein slipknot: multiple pathways revealed by force spectroscopy and steered molecular dynamics simulations. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  G. Zhao,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics simulation study on dynamic self-assembly of single-stranded DNA with double-walled carbon nanotube and graphene. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[6]  George C Schatz,et al.  Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of peptide amphiphile self-assembly into cylindrical nanofibers. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[7]  Derek N. Woolfson,et al.  More than just bare scaffolds: towards multi-component and decorated fibrous biomaterials. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[8]  Samuel I. Stupp,et al.  A Self-Assembly Pathway to Aligned Monodomain Gels , 2010, Nature materials.

[9]  Arlo Z. Randall,et al.  Computational and single-molecule force studies of a macro domain protein reveal a key molecular determinant for mechanical stability , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Samuel I Stupp,et al.  Molecular self-assembly into one-dimensional nanostructures. , 2008, Accounts of chemical research.

[11]  G. Schatz,et al.  Modeling self-assembly processes driven by nonbonded interactions in soft materials. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[12]  Andrew M. Smith,et al.  Designing peptide based nanomaterials. , 2008, Chemical Society reviews.

[13]  Samuel I Stupp,et al.  Molecular simulation study of peptide amphiphile self-assembly. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[14]  Krista L. Niece,et al.  Phase diagram for assembly of biologically-active peptide amphiphiles. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[15]  Hui Lu,et al.  Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals a mechanically stable protein fold and the rational tuning of its mechanical stability , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Christopher P Calderon On the use of local diffusion models for path ensemble averaging in potential of mean force computations. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[17]  George C Schatz,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics studies of the potential of mean force of a Na+ or K+ ion in a cyclic peptide nanotube. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[18]  Bernd Ensing,et al.  Self-assembling cyclic peptides: molecular dynamics studies of dimers in polar and nonpolar solvents. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[19]  Toshimi Shimizu,et al.  Supramolecular nanotube architectures based on amphiphilic molecules. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[20]  F. Solis,et al.  Charge induced pattern formation on surfaces: segregation in cylindrical micelles of cationic-anionic peptide-amphiphiles. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  S. Stupp,et al.  Coassembly of amphiphiles with opposite peptide polarities into nanofibers. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  M. Ratner,et al.  Electrostatically-Directed Self-Assembly of Cylindrical Peptide Amphiphile Nanostructures , 2004 .

[23]  K. Schulten,et al.  Calculating potentials of mean force from steered molecular dynamics simulations. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  A. Troisi,et al.  On the Structure and Stability of Self-Assembled Zwitterionic Peptide Amphiphiles: A Theoretical Study , 2004 .

[25]  K. Schulten,et al.  Free energy calculation from steered molecular dynamics simulations using Jarzynski's equality , 2003 .

[26]  M. Ratner,et al.  Hydrophobically-Driven Self-Assembly: A Geometric Packing Analysis , 2003 .

[27]  Shuguang Zhang,et al.  Molecular self-assembly of surfactant-like peptides to form nanotubes and nanovesicles , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Samuel I Stupp,et al.  Peptide-amphiphile nanofibers: A versatile scaffold for the preparation of self-assembling materials , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  K. Schulten,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics simulations of force‐induced protein domain unfolding , 1999, Proteins.

[30]  Laxmikant V. Kale,et al.  NAMD2: Greater Scalability for Parallel Molecular Dynamics , 1999 .

[31]  C. Jarzynski Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach , 1997, cond-mat/9707325.

[32]  C. Jarzynski Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences , 1996, cond-mat/9610209.

[33]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[34]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  An all-atom empirical energy function for the simulation of nucleic acids , 1995 .

[35]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[36]  M. Klein,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms , 1994 .

[37]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[38]  Akio Nakano,et al.  Characterization of molecular aggregates of peptide amphiphiles and kinetics of dynamic processes performed by single-walled vesicles , 1984 .

[39]  H. C. Andersen Rattle: A “velocity” version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[40]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[41]  Y. Murakami,et al.  Stable single-compartment vesicles with zwitterionic amphiphile involving an amino acid residue , 1980 .