Mechanical Loading Stimulates Bone Formation by Reactivation of Bone Lining Cells in 13‐Week‐Old Rats

The bone formation that occurs in response to mechanical stimulation is generally considered to be a means by which bone adapts to changes in its mechanical environment. We have previously shown that the expression of genes for bone matrix proteins is maximal 72 h after a single 5‐minute episode of loading of tail vertebrae of 13‐week‐old female rats, that the predominant increase in mineralization occurs after 3 days, and that the osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation is not dependent on prior bone resorption. We have now investigated the cellular correlates of this osteogenic response. No proliferation was detected, by pulse or flash labeling, in the trabecular bone surface cells of animals killed 1 h to 10 days after the loading episode. Ultrastructural examination revealed that most of the cells covering the trabecular bone surface of control vertebrae were flat bone lining cells. After mechanical stimulation, the trabecular bone surface cells developed ultrastructural features of osteoblastic differentiation and activity, with acquisition of an increasingly cuboidal shape, rounded nuclei, and abundant rough endoplasmic reticulum. Morphometric analysis of the mean cell area, mean nuclear area, and cell and nuclear height showed that they were all maximal 48 h after loading. By 120 h after loading, the appearances of bone surface cells had reverted to those of control vertebrae. Thus, mechanical loading appears to activate lining cells, with a temporal sequence that correlates with bone matrix production.

[1]  R. Boyce,et al.  Resorption is not essential for the stimulation of bone growth by hPTH‐(1‐34) in rats in vivo , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  D. Simmons,et al.  A cellular investment of bone marrow , 1982, The Anatomical record.

[3]  R. Liem,et al.  The use of chromic potassium sulphate in bone electron microscopy. , 1984, Acta morphologica Neerlando-Scandinavica.

[4]  C. S. Tam,et al.  Bone growth kinetics III. A biorhythm in bone growth in the rabbit , 1974, The Journal of pathology.

[5]  J. Chow,et al.  Increased insulin-like growth factor I mRNA expression in rat osteocytes in response to mechanical stimulation. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[6]  H. Frost,et al.  A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  M P Akhter,et al.  A noninvasive, in vivo model for studying strain adaptive bone modeling. , 1991, Bone.

[8]  J. Caulfield,et al.  Modulation of osteogenic cell ultrastructure by RS-23581, an analog of human parathyroid hormone (PTH)-related peptide-(1-34), and bovine PTH-(1-34). , 1995, Endocrinology.

[9]  J. Wergedal,et al.  Electron microprobe measurements of bone mineralization rate in vivo. , 1974, The American journal of physiology.

[10]  S. Ott Calculation of active formation period using label escape and three labels. , 1992, Bone.

[11]  H. Frost Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[12]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Direct transformation from quiescence to bone formation in the adult periosteum following a single brief period of bone loading , 1988, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  S. Miller,et al.  The proliferation and differentiation of the bone-lining cell in estrogen-induced osteogenesis. , 1986, Bone.

[14]  M. Arlot,et al.  Osteoblast density and the evolution of BMUs in vertebral osteoporosis. , 1992, Bone.

[15]  L E Lanyon,et al.  The success and failure of the adaptive response to functional load-bearing in averting bone fracture. , 1992, Bone.

[16]  M Evans,et al.  Induction of bone formation in rat tail vertebrae by mechanical loading. , 1993, Bone and mineral.

[17]  T J Chambers,et al.  Characterization of osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in cancellous bone of rat caudal vertebrae. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[18]  W. Jee,et al.  Characterization of endosteal bone‐lining cells from fatty marrow bone sites in adult beagles , 1980, The Anatomical record.

[19]  R. Turner,et al.  Evidence that intermittent treatment with parathyroid hormone increases bone formation in adult rats by activation of bone lining cells. , 1995, Endocrinology.

[20]  J. Chow,et al.  Stimulation of bone formation by dynamic mechanical loading of rat caudal vertebrae is not suppressed by 3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene-1-bisphosphonate (AHPrBP). , 1995, Bone.