A conceptual framework for the revision of the ICD‐10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders

The World Health Organization (WHO) is revising the ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders, under the leadership of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse and within the framework of the overall revision framework as directed by the World Health Assembly. This article describes WHO's perspective and priorities for mental and behavioural disorders classification in ICD-11, based on the recommendations of the International Advisory Group for the Revision of ICD-10 Mental and Behavioural Disorders. The WHO considers that the classification should be developed in consultation with stakeholders, which include WHO member countries, multidisciplinary health professionals, and users of mental health services and their families. Attention to the cultural framework must be a key element in defining future classification concepts. Uses of the ICD that must be considered include clinical applications, research, teaching and training, health statistics, and public health. The Advisory Group has determined that the current revision represents a particular opportunity to improve the classification's clinical utility, particularly in global primary care settings where there is the greatest opportunity to identify people who need mental health treatment. Based on WHO's mission and constitution, the usefulness of the classification in helping WHO member countries, particularly low- and middle-income countries, to reduce the disease burden associated with mental disorders is among the highest priorities for the revision. This article describes the foundation provided by the recommendations of the Advisory Group for the current phase of work.

[1]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[2]  S. Saxena,et al.  The WPA‐WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists’ Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification , 2011, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[3]  M. First Clinical utility in the revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). , 2010 .

[4]  T. Insel,et al.  Wesleyan University From the SelectedWorks of Charles A . Sanislow , Ph . D . 2010 Research Domain Criteria ( RDoC ) : Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders , 2018 .

[5]  S. Hyman,et al.  The diagnosis of mental disorders: the problem of reification. , 2010, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[6]  M. First Harmonisation of ICD-11 and DSM-V: opportunities and challenges. , 2009, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[7]  R. Alarcón,et al.  Culture, cultural factors and psychiatric diagnosis: review and projections , 2009, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[8]  S. Hyman,et al.  Exploring the feasibility of a meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11: could it improve utility and validity? , 2009, Psychological Medicine.

[9]  C. Kennedy,et al.  What is “functional impairment”? Disentangling disability from clinical significance , 2009, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[10]  C. Dowrick,et al.  Capturing complexity: The case for a new classification system for mental disorders in primary care , 2008, European Psychiatry.

[11]  I. Levav,et al.  Treatment gap in mental health care. , 2004, The Israel journal of psychiatry and related sciences.

[12]  H. Whiteford,et al.  Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency , 2007, The Lancet.

[13]  Josep Maria Haro,et al.  Use of mental health services for anxiety, mood, and substance disorders in 17 countries in the WHO world mental health surveys , 2007, The Lancet.

[14]  S. Hyman Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V? , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  L. Kirmayer,et al.  Culture, Context and Experience in Psychiatric Diagnosis , 2005, Psychopathology.

[16]  P. Ruiz A Research Agenda for DSM-V , 2004 .

[17]  Heather Thompson-Brenner,et al.  The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  R. Kessler,et al.  Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. , 2004, JAMA.

[19]  이동우 한국어판 Composite International Diagnostic Interview의 타당도 , 2003 .

[20]  R. Kendell,et al.  Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[21]  Yan-Fang Chen,et al.  Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders (CCMD-3): Towards Integration in International Classification , 2002, Psychopathology.

[22]  A. Otero-Ojeda Third Cuban Glossary of Psychiatry (GC-3): Key Features and Contributions , 2002, Psychopathology.

[23]  Kenneth S. Kendler,et al.  Basic nomenclature issues for DSM-V. , 2002 .

[24]  N. Smith Diagnostic and Management Guidelines for Mental Disorders in Primary Care: ICD-10 Chapter V Primary Care Version , 1998 .

[25]  D. Regier,et al.  Progress toward achieving a common language in psychiatry. Results from the field trial of the clinical guidelines accompanying the WHO classification of mental and behavioral disorders in ICD-10. , 1993, Archives of general psychiatry.

[26]  R. Hirschfeld,et al.  The WHO/ADAMHA International pilot study of personality disorders: Background and purpose , 1991 .

[27]  T. Brugha,et al.  SCAN. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. , 1990, Archives of general psychiatry.

[28]  R. Hirschfeld,et al.  Diagnosis and classification of mental disorders and alcohol- and drug-related problems: a research agenda for the 1980s , 1983, Psychological Medicine.

[29]  A. Jablensky,et al.  The ICD‐9 classification of mental disorders| A REVIEW OF ITS DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENTS , 1979, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[30]  N. Sartorius Classification: An International Perspective , 1976 .