Optimal Social-Networking Strategy Is a Function of Socioeconomic Conditions

In the two studies reported here, we examined the relation among residential mobility, economic conditions, and optimal social-networking strategy. In Study 1, a computer simulation showed that regardless of economic conditions, having a broad social network with weak friendship ties is advantageous when friends are likely to move away. By contrast, having a small social network with deep friendship ties is advantageous when the economy is unstable but friends are not likely to move away. In Study 2, we examined the validity of the computer simulation using a sample of American adults. Results were consistent with the simulation: American adults living in a zip code where people are residentially stable but economically challenged were happier if they had a narrow but deep social network, whereas in other socioeconomic conditions, people were generally happier if they had a broad but shallow networking strategy. Together, our studies demonstrate that the optimal social-networking strategy varies as a function of socioeconomic conditions.

[1]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[2]  G. Adams The cultural grounding of personal relationship: enemyship in North American and West African worlds. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[4]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The socioecological model of procommunity action: the benefits of residential stability. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Selin Kesebir,et al.  Residential mobility increases motivation to expand social network: But why? , 2013 .

[6]  Caroline E. G. Tutin,et al.  Mating patterns and reproductive strategies in a community of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  J. Traupmann,et al.  Equity: Theory and Research , 1978 .

[8]  M. Yuki,et al.  Relational Mobility Explains Between- and Within-Culture Differences in Self-Disclosure to Close Friends , 2010, Psychological science.

[9]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[10]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[11]  S. Oishi The Psychology of Residential Mobility: Implications for the Self, Social Relationships, and Well-Being , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[12]  E. Mayr This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World , 1997 .

[13]  S. Kalick,et al.  The Matching Hypothesis Reexamined , 1986 .

[14]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[15]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Subjective Weil-Being: Three Decades of Progress , 2004 .

[16]  Kate A. Ratliff,et al.  Residential mobility breeds familiarity-seeking. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  D. Buss,et al.  The evolution of happiness. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[18]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .