PII: S0042-6989(00)00089-4

Three experiments were performed to verify O’Regan’s (1979) [Perception & Psychophysics, 25 (6), 501–509] finding that in reading, the eye moves further forward when going towards the word ‘THE’ than when going towards a three-letter verb. The experiments were performed in French instead of English, and compared the plural article ‘les’ with different three-letter verbs. It was confirmed that the eye did indeed move about 1.5 letters further in the case of the article ‘les’. Further investigation of the phenomenon suggested that the effect was present even when the prior fixation duration was short: Only when prior fixation was around 200 ms or less, and additionally when the eye started from a launch position that was far from the word, was there a suggestion that the ‘les’-skipping effect disappeared. © 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

[1]  J. Kevin O’Regan,et al.  The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Karine Doré,et al.  The ‘center of gravity’ of words: Evidence for an effect of the word-initial letters , 1996, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Kevin O’Regan,et al.  Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  D. Zola.  Redundancy and word perception during reading , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Local and global sources of contextual facilitation in reading , 1987 .

[7]  R. E. Morrison,et al.  Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  P. W. Kerr,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.

[9]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The Right Visual Field Advantage and the Optimal Viewing Position Effect : On the Relation Between Foveal and Parafoveal Word Recognition , 1996 .

[10]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: evidence against semantic preprocessing. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  J. Findlay.  Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements , 1982, Vision Research.

[12]  J. O'Regan.  Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[13]  G Underwood,et al.  How Do Readers Know Where to Look Next? Local Information Distributions Influence Eye Fixations , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  C. Beauvillain,et al.  Latency dependence of word-initial letter integration by the saccadic system , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  G Underwood,et al.  Reading long words embedded in sentences: informativeness of word halves affects eye movements. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  D. Balota,et al.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .

[18]  F. Vitu,et al.  The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  The existence of a center of gravity effect during reading , 1991, Vision Research.

[20]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  G Underwood,et al.  Information Influences the Pattern of Eye Fixations during Sentence Comprehension , 1988, Perception.

[22]  A W Inhoff,et al.  Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Christian Coëffé,et al.  Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: Predictability and latency effects , 1987, Vision Research.