Effectiveness of USDA instrument-based marbling measurements for categorizing beef carcasses according to differences in longissimus muscle sensory attributes.

This study quantified relationships between USDA instrument marbling measurements and LM sensory attributes (tenderness, flavor, juiciness), and shear force. Heifer (n = 390) and steer (n = 328) carcasses (all A-maturity) were selected at 4 beef processing plants in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and Texas to represent 7 marbling degrees: traces (TR), slight (SL), small (SM), modest (MT), moderate (MD), slightly abundant (SA), and moderately abundant (MA). Classification into marbling groups was based on marbling scores determined using USDA-approved VBG 2000 grading systems. Strip loin steaks were obtained from both sides of each carcass and aged for 14 d. One steak was used to obtain Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and slice shear force (SSF) measurements. The other steak was evaluated by a trained sensory panel for juiciness, tenderness, intensity of flavors characterized as meaty/brothy, buttery/beef fat, bloody/serumy, livery/organy, and grassy; and overall sensory experience (negative or positive). Instrument marbling score explained 45%, 40%, 32%, 71%, and 61% of the observed variation in panel ratings for juiciness, tenderness, meaty/brothy flavor intensity, buttery/beef fat flavor intensity, and overall sensory experience, respectively. Increased degree of marbling resulted in steaks having greater (P < 0.001) juiciness (MA > SA > MD > MT > SM > SL = TR), meaty/brothy flavor (MA = SA > MD = MT > SM > SL > TR), and buttery/beef fat flavor (MA > SA > MD > MT > SM > SL > TR). Steak tenderness also increased (P < 0.001) as marbling degree increased; however, tenderness differences among marbling degrees differed for steers (MA = SA > MD = MT > SM > SL = TR) and heifers (MA = SA > MD > MT > SM > SL > TR). Steaks produced by steers had lower (P < 0.05) WBSF and SSF values, and were rated as more tender by sensory panelists than steaks produced by heifers, but the effect of sex on panel tenderness was significant only among steaks with TR marbling. Results of this study showed that instrument-based classification of beef carcasses, according to differences in marbling, effectively identified subsequent differences in strip loin steak sensory performance. Nearly all (98 to 99%) steaks with MA or SA marbling, and most (between 80% and 90%) steaks with MD and MT marbling, received positive ratings for overall sensory experience. In comparison, 62% of SM steaks, 29% of SL steaks, and 15% of TR steaks received positive sensory experience ratings.

[1]  D. S. Hale,et al.  National Beef Quality Audit-2011: In-plant survey of targeted carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, value, and marketing of fed steers and heifers. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[2]  M. Ellersieck,et al.  Prediction of fat percentage within marbling score on beef longissimus muscle using 3 different fat determination methods. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[3]  J B Morgan,et al.  Efficacy of performing Warner-Bratzler and slice shear force on the same beef steak following rapid cooking. , 2010, Meat science.

[4]  C. B. Moore,et al.  Establishing an appropriate mode of comparison for measuring the performance of marbling score output from video image analysis beef carcass grading systems. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[5]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  International perspective: characterisation of United States Department of Agriculture and Meat Standards Australia systems for assessing beef quality , 2008 .

[6]  D. S. Hale,et al.  National Beef Quality Audit-2005: survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[7]  K. Belk,et al.  The effects of cattle sex on carcass characteristics and longissimus muscle palatability. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[8]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  Relationships of consumer sensory ratings, marbling score, and shear force value to consumer acceptance of beef strip loin steaks. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[9]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  An evaluation of the USDA standards for feeder cattle frame size and muscle thickness. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[10]  E. Puolanne,et al.  Variation of residual glycogen-glucose concentration at ultimate pH values below 5.75. , 2000, Meat science.

[11]  J. B. Morgan,et al.  Genetic influences on beef longissimus palatability in charolais- and limousin-sired steers and heifers. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[12]  L. E. Jeremiah,et al.  The usefulness of muscle color and pH for segregating beef carcasses into tenderness groups. , 1991, Meat science.

[13]  H. Cross,et al.  National Consumer Retail Beef Study: Palatability Evaluations of Beef Loin Steaks that Differed in Marbling , 1987 .

[14]  H. B. Hedrick,et al.  Flavor Constituents of Beef as Influenced by Forage‐ and Grain‐Feeding , 1987 .

[15]  H. Cross,et al.  Percentage Ether Extractable Fat and Moisture Content of Beef Longissimus Muscle as Related to USDA Marbling Score , 1986 .

[16]  G. W. Davis,et al.  RELATIONSHIP OF USDA MARBLING GROUPS TO PALATABILITY OF COOKED BEEF , 1985 .

[17]  M. Dikeman,et al.  PREDICTIVE VALUE OF USDA BEEF QUALITY GRADE FACTORS FOR COOKED MEAT PALATABILITY , 1975 .

[18]  D. L. Huffman An Evaluation of the Tenderometer for Measuring Beef Tenderness , 1974 .

[19]  J. Wiles,et al.  Influence of Marbling and Carcass Grade on the Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Beef , 1967 .