The importance of landscape context for songbirds on migration: body mass gain is related to habitat cover

Landscape context influences many aspects of songbird ecology during the breeding season. The importance of landscape context at stopover sites for migrating songbirds, however, has received less attention. In particular, landscape context may affect the availability and quality of food for refueling during stopovers, which is critical for successful migration. We evaluated the influence of woody habitat cover in the surroundings of stopover sites at several spatial extents on the hourly changes of body mass in two species of European-African forest-dwelling songbird migrants (Willow Warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus, and the Eurasian Redstart, Phoenicurus phoenicurus). Data were sampled by standardized methods from a network of ringing stations throughout Europe during the falls of 1994–1996. In both species, hourly body mass gain calculated for first captures increased with woody habitat cover. We found a similar logarithmic relationship for both species, although for Willow Warblers mass gain was more strongly related to the habitat cover within 5 km, in contrast to 3 km for Redstarts. For Willow Warblers, where sufficient data are available for each year, the relationship is consistent over the years. The shape of the relationship suggests existence of a threshold of landscape suitability for refueling at stopover sites: in sites with less than 10% of woody habitat cover, birds tend to lose body mass or to gain mass at a lower rate.

[1]  S. Åkesson,et al.  A comparison of autumn migration strategies in robins erithacus rubecula at a coastal and an inland site in southern Sweden , 1993 .

[2]  Melissa S. Bowlin,et al.  Biotelemetry of New World thrushes during migration: Physiology, energetics and orientation in the wild1 , 2005, Integrative and comparative biology.

[3]  F. Bairlein,et al.  Nutritional mechanisms and temporal control of migratory energy accumulation in birds. , 1994, Annual review of nutrition.

[4]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  Quantifying Landscape Spatial Pattern: What Is the State of the Art? , 1998, Ecosystems.

[5]  C. Guglielmo,et al.  LANDSCAPE-SCALE PHYSIOLOGY: SITE DIFFERENCES IN REFUELING RATES INDICATED BY PLASMA METABOLITE ANALYSIS IN FREE-LIVING MIGRATORY SANDPIPERS , 2006 .

[6]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Landscape Ecology Comes of Age1 , 2005 .

[7]  N. Chernetsov.  Habitat selection by nocturnal passerine migrants en route: mechanisms and results , 2006, Journal of Ornithology.

[8]  S. Cramp.  Tyrant flycatchers to thrushes , 1988 .

[9]  E. Dunn.  A CROSS-CANADA COMPARISON OF MASS CHANGE IN BIRDS DURING MIGRATION STOPOVER , 2002 .

[10]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Ecological Thresholds: The Key to Successful Environmental Management or an Important Concept with No Practical Application? , 2006, Ecosystems.

[11]  J. Wiens.  Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[12]  Weber,et al.  Blissful Ignorance? Departure Rules for Migrants in a Spatially Heterogeneous Environment. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  M. Fortin,et al.  INFLUENCE OF FOREST COVER ON THE MOVEMENTS OF FOREST BIRDS: A HOMING EXPERIMENT , 2001 .

[14]  K. Gaston,et al.  Pattern and Process in Macroecology , 2000 .

[15]  K. Winker.  Habitat selection in woodland nearctic-neotropic migrants on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. I. Autumn migration , 1995 .

[16]  Kevin Winker.  Xiphorhynchus striatigularis (Dendrocolaptidae): Nomen monstrositatum , 1995 .

[17]  N. Chernetsov.  Habitat distribution during the post-breeding and post-Hedging period in the Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus and Sedge Warbler A. schoenobaenus depends on food abundance , 1998 .

[18]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Kullback-Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies , 2001 .

[19]  K. Winker,et al.  Daily Mass Gains Among Woodland Migrants at an Inland Stopover Site , 1992 .

[20]  L. Jenni,et al.  Moult and Ageing of European Passerines , 1994 .

[21]  J. Kelly,et al.  DENSITY-DEPENDENT MASS GAIN BY WILSON'S WARBLERS DURING STOPOVER , 2002 .

[22]  C. Wernham.  The migration atlas : movements of the birds of Britain and Ireland , 2002 .

[23]  J. Rappole,et al.  Relationships between behavior, physiology and weather in avian transients at a migration stopover site , 1976, Oecologia.

[24]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  F. Thompson,et al.  Nest Predators and Fragmentation: a Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2002 .

[26]  D. Padilla,et al.  Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns , 1987 .

[27]  Mark S. Woodrey,et al.  CONSERVING STOPOVER SITES FOR FOREST-DWELLING MIGRATORY LANDBIRDS , 2005 .

[28]  Martin L. Cody,et al.  Habitat selection in birds , 1986 .

[29]  George R. Parker,et al.  Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  Å. Lindström.  Fuel deposition rates in migrating birds: Causes, constraints and consequences. , 2003 .

[31]  Yrjö Haila,et al.  A CONCEPTUAL GENEALOGY OF FRAGMENTATION RESEARCH: FROM ISLAND BIOGEOGRAPHY TO LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY* , 2002 .

[32]  Philip A. Stephens,et al.  Information theory and hypothesis testing: a call for pluralism , 2005 .

[33]  M. Schaub,et al.  Variation of fuelling rates among sites, days and individuals in migrating passerine birds , 2001 .

[34]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[35]  F. Moore,et al.  Evidence of food-based competition among passerine migrants during stopover , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  D. Finch,et al.  Ecology and Management of Neotropical Migratory Birds. , 1997 .

[37]  David A. Aborn,et al.  Mechanisms of en route habitat selection : How do migrants make habitat decisions during stopover? , 2000 .

[38]  Jeffrey J. Buler,et al.  Understanding habitat use by landbirds during migration along the Mississippi Gulf Coast using a scale-dependent approach , 2006 .

[39]  M. Hansson,et al.  Competition and fat deposition in Goldcrests (Regulus regulus) at a migration stop-over site , 1989 .

[40]  Therese M. Donovan,et al.  Regional Forest Fragmentation and the Nesting Success of Migratory Birds , 1995, Science.

[41]  NIGHT MOVEMENTS OF YOUNG REED WARBLERS (ACROCEPHALUS SCIRPACEUS) IN SUMMER: IS IT POSTFLEDGING DISPERSAL? , 2004 .

[42]  F. Bairlein.  Habitat selection and associations of species in European Passerine birds during southward, post-breeding migrations , 1983 .

[43]  Shelley A. Hinsley,et al.  Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence of individual breeding bird species in woodland fragments , 1995 .

[44]  M. Wilson,et al.  Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The birds of the Western Palearctic: 3. Waders to gulls , 1984 .

[45]  P. Berthold.  Control of bird migration , 1996 .

[46]  M. Schaub,et al.  Behavioural and Physiological Reactions to Environmental Variation in Bird Migration: a Review , 2003 .

[47]  Edwin W. Pak,et al.  An extended AVHRR 8‐km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data , 2005 .

[48]  F. Bairlein.  How do migratory songbirds cross the Sahara? , 1988, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[49]  D. Petit.  Habitat use by landbirds along nearctic-neotropical migration routes : Implications for conservation of stopover habitats , 2000 .

[50]  MASS CHANGE DURING MIGRATION STOPOVER: A COMPARISON OF SPECIES GROUPS AND SITES , 2001 .

[51]  E. Dunn.  TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL PATTERNS IN DAILY MASS GAIN OF MAGNOLIA WARBLERS DURING MIGRATORY STOPOVER , 2000 .