How international research consortia can strengthen organisations’ research systems and promote a conducive environment and culture

Research systems and cultures have been criticised for their detrimental effect on members’ mental health and well-being. Many international research programmes operate through research consortia that have the resources to make a substantial contribution to improving the research environment in their member organisations. This paper collates real-life examples from several large international consortia-based research programmes about how they strengthened organisations’ research capacity. The consortia primarily involved academic partners from the UK and/or sub-Saharan Africa and covered research topics including health, natural sciences, conservation agriculture and vector control. They were partly or wholly funded by UK agencies including the Wellcome, Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office, UK Research and Innovation Fund, and the Medical Research Council and they operated for 2–10 years between 2012 and 2022. Consortia’s size and ability to access and share resources among their member organisations according to need meant they were uniquely placed to target actions to address weaknesses in member organisations’ research capacity, to widen networks and collaborations, and to build in sustainability of capacity gains. Consortia’s actions covered: (a) individuals’ knowledge and skills; (b) capacity strengthening ethos; (c) organisations’ visibility and prestige; and (d) inclusive and responsive management practices. Evidence about these actions formed the basis of recommendations for funders and leaders of consortium-based programmes about how they could make more effective use of consortia’s resources to enhance organisations’ research systems, environments and cultures. Key lessons were that training should cover management and research leadership and should be offered beyond consortium members, including to research support staff such as technicians and managers. Consortia often tackle complex problems requiring multidisciplinary inputs, but overcoming disciplinary boundaries—and making everyone feel valued and respected—takes time and skill on the part of consortium leaders. Consortia need clear guidance from funders about their commitment to strengthening research capacity. Without this, consortia leaders may continue to prioritise research outputs over creating and embedding sustainable improvements in their organisations’ research systems.

[1]  J. Pulford,et al.  A framework for managing health research capacity strengthening consortia: addressing tensions and enhancing capacity outcomes , 2022, BMJ Global Health.

[2]  J. Pulford,et al.  Enabling research capacity strengthening within a consortium context: a qualitative study , 2022, BMJ Global Health.

[3]  I. Bates,et al.  Identifying actions to foster cross-disciplinary global health research: a mixed-methods qualitative case study of the IMPALA programme on lung health and tuberculosis in Africa , 2022, BMJ Open.

[4]  J. Pulford,et al.  Institutional-level drivers of gender-inequitable scientific career progression in sub-Saharan Africa , 2021, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[5]  S. Rappaport,et al.  Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in , 2020, Wellcome Open Research.

[6]  R. Rajala,et al.  Integrating CSR with Business Strategy: A Tension Management Perspective , 2020, Journal of Business Ethics.

[7]  J. Pulford,et al.  Measuring the outcome and impact of research capacity strengthening initiatives: A review of indicators used or described in the published and grey literature , 2020, F1000Research.

[8]  D. Maher,et al.  External funding to strengthen capacity for research in low-income and middle-income countries: exigence, excellence and equity , 2020, BMJ Global Health.

[9]  J. Pulford,et al.  Managing health research capacity strengthening consortia: a systematised review of the published literature , 2019, BMJ Global Health.

[10]  V. Patel,et al.  Partnerships in a Global Mental Health Research Programme—the Example of PRIME , 2018, Global Social Welfare.

[11]  P. Ritala,et al.  The multiple faces of tension: dualities in decision-making , 2018, Review of Managerial Science.

[12]  K. Sheikh,et al.  Developing the National Knowledge Platform in India: a policy and institutional analysis , 2018, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[13]  L. Dean,et al.  Advancing the science of health research capacity strengthening in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the published literature, 2000–2016 , 2017, BMJ Open.

[14]  P. P. Rosario,et al.  Ethical challenges for international collaborative research partnerships in the context of the Zika outbreak in the Dominican Republic: a qualitative case study , 2017, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[15]  Trudie Lang,et al.  Health research capacity development in low and middle income countries: reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature , 2017, BMJ Open.

[16]  R. Brugha,et al.  “The way the country has been carved up by researchers”: ethics and power in north–south public health research , 2016, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[17]  M. Zwarenstein,et al.  North–south collaboration and capacity development in global health research in low- and middle-income countries – the ARCADE projects , 2016, Global health action.

[18]  M. Zwarenstein,et al.  Successes and challenges of north–south partnerships – key lessons from the African/Asian Regional Capacity Development projects , 2016, Global health action.

[19]  M. Fischer,et al.  Tools and instruments for needs assessment, monitoring and evaluation of health research capacity development activities at the individual and organizational level: a systematic review , 2015, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[20]  Matthew Hunt,et al.  Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries , 2014, BMC medical ethics.

[21]  A. Boyd,et al.  A practical and systematic approach to organisational capacity strengthening for research in the health sector in Africa , 2014, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[22]  Sudha Jayaraman,et al.  Building Research Capacity in Africa: Equity and Global Health Collaborations , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[23]  S. Diepeveen,et al.  RESEARCH CAPACITY‐BUILDING IN AFRICA: NETWORKS, INSTITUTIONS AND LOCAL OWNERSHIP , 2013 .

[24]  Lavagnon A. Ika Project Management for Development in Africa: Why Projects are Failing and What Can be Done about It , 2012 .

[25]  A. Omigbodun,et al.  Building capacity for public and population health research in Africa: the consortium for advanced research training in Africa (CARTA) model , 2010, Global health action.

[26]  Robert Johnston,et al.  Managing the tension between performance measurement and strategy: coping strategies , 2008 .

[27]  K. Provan,et al.  Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness , 2007 .

[28]  J. Perry,et al.  Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box , 2006 .

[29]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[30]  T. Das,et al.  Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective , 2000 .

[31]  Elaine Murphy,et al.  Institutional assessment : a framework for strengthening organizational capacity for IDRC's research partners , 1995 .

[32]  D. Cole,et al.  The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation. , 2017, F1000Research.

[33]  I. Vogel,et al.  Review of the use of 'Theory of Change' in international development. Review Report. , 2012 .

[34]  H. Naqvi Research culture. , 2011, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[35]  T. English NEGOTIATION AS TENSION MANAGEMENT: A MODEL FOR BUSINESS AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS 1 , 2002 .