Neighborhood Rough-Sets-Based Spatial Data Analytics

With the huge amount of data generated every day, governments, corporates and scientists look at mining useful information from them. Considering the storage and organization costs of these data, the useful trade-off is to discover useful patterns in them. Transactional, telecommunication, spatial, satellite, remote sensing, medical informatics etc., are some of the domains dealing with Big Data. Discovering patterns and inferring predictions are vital to the well-being of man-kind at large. Analysis of spatial data usually includes construction of information system, dimensionality reduction, decision rule extraction based on a computational model and error analysis. This chapter focuses on the construction decision systems, proposes a hybrid method by substantiating the advantages and challenges involved with spatial data. Spatial Data upholds an important perspective that it can be analysed only with respect to specific spatial reference (or a geographic area).Spatial data include spatial attributes like temperature, rainfall, humidity, slope, land cover etc., These features will be with respect to a spatial reference and encompass spatial auto correlation. Spatial auto correlation is the property of spatial data where the values of a feature will tend to be similar in a neighborhood and vary with increasing distance from the neighborhood. Figure 1 illustrates a sample region identified with latitudes and longitudes. A number of spatial features can be measured and some of them are shown in Table 1. BACKGROUND

[1]  Yong Ge,et al.  Handling Spatial-Correlated Attribute Values in a Rough Set , 2009, ICCSA.

[2]  Tony R. Martinez,et al.  Improved Heterogeneous Distance Functions , 1996, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[3]  Qiang Shen,et al.  Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction: rough and fuzzy-rough-based approaches , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[4]  Ola Ahlqvist,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Geographical Information Science Using Uncertain Conceptual Spaces to Translate between Land Cover Categories Using Uncertain Conceptual Spaces to Translate between Land Cover Categories , 2022 .

[5]  Bapuji Rao,et al.  A New Approach to Community Graph Partition Using Graph Mining Techniques , 2017, Int. J. Rough Sets Data Anal..

[6]  Jagdish W. Bakal,et al.  Big Data Summarization Using Novel Clustering Algorithm and Semantic Feature Approach , 2017, Int. J. Rough Sets Data Anal..

[7]  Yee Leung,et al.  A rough set approach to the discovery of classification rules in spatial data , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[9]  Yong Ge,et al.  Using rough set theory to identify villages affected by birth defects: the example of Heshun, Shanxi, China , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Tsau Young Lin,et al.  Data Mining and Machine Oriented Modeling: A Granular Computing Approach , 2000, Applied Intelligence.

[11]  D. Dubois,et al.  ROUGH FUZZY SETS AND FUZZY ROUGH SETS , 1990 .

[12]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[13]  Shuliang Wang,et al.  Rough Spatial Interpretation , 2004, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[14]  Yiyu Yao Granular Computing using Neighborhood Systems , 1999 .

[15]  T. Beaubouef,et al.  A rough set foundation for spatial data mining involving vague regions , 2002, 2002 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. 2002 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. FUZZ-IEEE'02. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37291).

[16]  Zdzislaw Pawlak,et al.  On Conflicts , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..