Technology transfer between basic research and industry

Abstract Pure science-driven incentives and applied industrial and technology policy have seldom produced significant synergy. The demarcation between basic and applied research is still valid, yet from the industrial and macro-economic point of view this classification has become obsolete and the pursuit towards common welfare should be prioritized. This paper studies what steps should be taken in a large-scale basic research centre to produce, in a more efficient way, both the epistemic utilities required by the scientific community and the practical utilities demanded by industrial and national institutions. The aim is to develop an approach that enables industrial companies to consolidate themselves with the technologies and other services needed to accomplish major basic research experiments. The paper provides an overview of the concepts describing the technology transfer, diffusion and innovation functions in an organization and how they should be implemented into the strategy and operational activities of a basic research centre. The paper concludes that without organized and well focused interaction with industry the gains from basic research are not exploited. It presents various scenarios of cooperation and practical suggestions to accomplish fertile communication between academic community and industry. The key factor in collaboration is in learning by interacting; thus, being part of the knowledge creation process, the prospects for both scientific inventions and industrial innovations are established. The underlying case is that of CERN and especially the 10-year accelerator project at its commencement.

[1]  Eliezer Geisler,et al.  University—Industry Relations: A Review of Major Issues , 1989 .

[2]  U. Hilpert State policies and techno-industrial innovation , 1991 .

[3]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Cooperative research and development : the industry, university, government relationship , 1989 .

[4]  K. Pavitt What makes basic research economically useful , 1991 .

[5]  Martin Lindell,et al.  Developing new products--an action, interaction and contextual approach , 1991 .

[6]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[7]  Edward P. Hawthorne The management of technology , 1978 .

[8]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[9]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution , 1988 .

[10]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[11]  C. Freeman Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[12]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[13]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[14]  Beth Krevitt Eres,et al.  A methodology for reducing technological risk , 1988 .

[15]  G. Dosi Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[16]  A. Phillimore University research performance indicators in practice: The University Grants Committee's evaluation of British universities, 1985-86 , 1989 .

[17]  Ryuhei Wakasugi,et al.  Why are Japanese firms so innovative in engineering technology , 1992 .

[18]  C. Freeman Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[19]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[20]  Esben Sloth Andersen,et al.  Small National Systems of Innovation Facing Technological Revolutions:An analytical framework , 1988 .