Researching rural conflicts: hunting, local politics and actor-networks

Abstract Conflicts over the definition, production, reproduction and consumption of rurality and rural space have become an increasingly important focus for research in recent years. Researchers have employed a range of conceptual approaches in the analysis of rural conflicts, including pluralism, class theory and regulation theory. This paper explores the potential of an alternative approach, based on the theory of actor-networks developed in the sociology of science. Actor-network theory, its potential contribution to the study of political conflicts, and its possible weaknesses, is outlined before being applied to a case study. The case study, which concerns the attempt by a local authority in south west England to prohibit staghunting on its land, is described in detail, and an actor-network account of the case constructed. The contribution of actor-network theory to researching rural political conflicts is then evaluated and a critique developed around its observed shortcomings.

[1]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  The Spatialization of Politics: Local and National Actor-Spaces in Environmental Conflict , 1995 .

[2]  Hunting the wild red deer: The social organization and ritual of a ‘rural’ institution , 1994 .

[3]  A. Blowers.  The limits of power , 1980 .

[4]  Michel Callon,et al.  Agency and the Hybrid Collectif , 1995, Mathematics, Science, and Postclassical Theory.

[5]  J. Murdoch,et al.  Actor-Networks and the Evolution of Economic Forms: Combining Description and Explanation in Theories of Regulation, Flexible Specialization, and Networks , 1995 .

[6]  Nick Bingham,et al.  Object-Ions: From Technological Determinism towards Geographies of Relations , 1996 .

[7]  M. Mormont.  Who is rural? or, how to be rural: towards a sociology of the rural. , 1990 .

[8]  M. Winter,et al.  Agriculture: People and Policies , 2019, Springer Netherlands.

[9]  A. Pratt,et al.  Rural studies: Modernism, postmodernism and the ‘post-rural’ , 1993 .

[10]  T. O'riordan,et al.  Countryside Conflicts: The Politics of Farming, Forestry and Conservation@@@Nature's Place: Conservation Sites and Countryside Change , 1986 .

[11]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[12]  A. Pratt,et al.  Rural studies of power and the power of rural studies: a reply to Philo , 1994 .

[13]  M. Callon.  The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[14]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[15]  Marc Mormon.  The emergence of rural struggles and their ideological effects , 1983 .

[16]  A. Pickering.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[17]  S. Seymour.  Imagined country; Society, culture and environment: J.R. Short, 221 pp., 1991, Routledge, London and New York, £40.00 hb , 1992 .

[18]  G. Stoker.  The Politics of Local Government , 1988 .

[19]  Martin Smith.  CHANGING AGENDAS AND POLICY COMMUNITIES: AGRICULTURAL ISSUES IN THE 1930s AND THE 1980s , 1989 .

[20]  H. Newby.  Country Life: A Social History of Rural England , 1987 .

[21]  P. Cloke,et al.  Conceptualising Countryside Change : From Post-Fordism to Rural Structured Coherence , 1992 .

[22]  M. Woods.  Discourses of power and rurality , 1997 .

[23]  N. Everett.  The Tory view of landscape , 1994 .

[24]  W. Page.  The Victoria history of the county of Somerset , 1906 .

[25]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[26]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Powers of Association , 1984 .

[27]  P. Selman,et al.  Rural Restructuring: Global Processes and Their Responses , 1990 .

[28]  M. Woods.  Mad Cows and Hounded Deer: Political Representations of Animals in the British Countryside , 1998 .

[29]  T. Marsden.  Constructing The Countryside , 1993 .

[30]  C. Philo.  Neglected rural geographies: A review , 1992 .