Focal Firms as Technological Gatekeepers within Industrial Districts: Evidence from the Packaging Machinery Industry

This paper examines how knowledge is created and transferred among firms within a geographical bounded industrial cluster. Using patent data from the automatic packaging machinery industrial district in the region Emilia-Romagna in Northern Italy, we first provide an empirical test of the widely diffused (and rarely measured) assumption that knowledge generated by cluster-based firms more easily flows within the cluster than outside it. Then, we advance that leading firms within the cluster assume the role of "gatekeepers" in driving the processes of new knowledge creation and diffusion. They introduce external technological novelties in the cluster and enact new useful knowledge production locally, thus enhancing international competitive capabilities of all firms in the cluster.

[1]  Sebastiano Brusco.  The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration , 1982 .

[2]  Giacomo Becattini,et al.  Industrial Sectors and Industrial Districts: Tools for Industrial Analysis , 2002 .

[3]  Ron Martin,et al.  Critical survey. The new 'geographical turn' in economics: some critical reflections , 1999 .

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[5]  A. Shaw,et al.  On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics , 2000 .

[6]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[7]  A. Jaffe.  The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process , 2000 .

[8]  Rui Baptista,et al.  Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters , 2000 .

[9]  Cristina Boari,et al.  Networks within Industrial Districts: Organising Knowledge Creation and Transfer by Means of Moderate Hierarchies , 1999 .

[10]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[11]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[12]  Francesco Lissoni,et al.  Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: the case of Brescia mechanical cluster , 2001 .

[13]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The firms that feed industrial districts: A return to the Italian source , 1999 .

[14]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? , 2004 .

[15]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[16]  Erik Stam,et al.  Clusters of High Technology SMEs: The Dutch Case , 1999 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[18]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[19]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  HOW DOES KNOWLEDGE FLOW? INTERFIRM PATTERNS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[20]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  Creating a Strategic Center to Manage a Web of Partners , 1995 .

[21]  A. A. Kayal,et al.  An empirical evaluation of the technology cycle time indicator as a measure of the pace of technological progress in superconductor technology , 1999 .

[22]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[23]  Kevin Davis,et al.  Building High-Tech Clusters: Learning the Silicon Valley Way , 2004 .

[24]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[25]  Pietro Romano,et al.  Back to the Future: Benetton Transforms Its Global Network , 2001 .

[26]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  What is behind the recent surge in patenting , 1999 .

[27]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[28]  M. Feldman.  The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[29]  Suma Athreye,et al.  Agglomeration and Growth: A Study of the Cambridge Hi-Tech Cluster , 2001 .

[30]  John E. Richards.  Clusters, Competition, and “Global Players” in ICT Markets: The Case of Scandinavia , 2004 .

[31]  Juan Alcacer,et al.  How Do I Know What You Know? Patent Examiners and the Generation of Patent Citations , 2004 .

[32]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Reinventing Public R&D: Patent Policy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies , 2001 .

[33]  Maurizio Sobrero,et al.  The glue and the pieces: Entrepreneurship and innovation in small-firm networks , 1994 .

[34]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[35]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[36]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[37]  Maryann P. Feldman.  The geography of innovation , 1994 .

[38]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Building High-Tech Clusters: Taiwan's Hsinchu Region , 2004 .

[39]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[40]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[41]  H. Schmitz,et al.  Small Shoemakers and Fordist Giants: Tale of a Supercluster , 1993 .

[42]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[43]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[44]  A. Saxenian.  The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley , 1991 .

[45]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[46]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[47]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[48]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localization of Innovation , 1997 .

[49]  R. Katz,et al.  An Investigation into the Managerial Roles and Career Paths of Gatekeepers and Project Supervisors in a Major R&D Facility : R&D Management , 2011 .

[50]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Innovation and Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from European Data , 2003 .

[51]  Jeffrey H. Dyer.  Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[52]  Vincenza Odorici,et al.  Clusters and Rivalry: Does Localization Really Matter? , 2003 .