The manipulation of stimulus quality and the definition of stimulus encoding operations in memory scanning experiments

Two experiments examine procedures for defining and isolating stimulus encoding processes within the standard memory scanning task. Two manipulations are used to converge on this definition: letter case (i.e., physical vs. name matching of letters) and stimulus quality. Experiment 1 produced equal scanning rates for the name match and the control conditions in which letter case was not varied. The physical match conditions produced scanning rates half as great as the control. None of these rates were greatly affected by the degradation (contrast reduction) of the probe stimulus, although the small difference in rates for the physical match condition was significant. Experiment 2 investigated two modes of stimulus degradation, contrast reduction and the addition of visual noise. All of the results of the first experiment were replicated for both modes of degradation, with the exception of the change in the scanning rates for the physical match condition. In addition, visual noise produced greater differences between positive and negative response times than did contrast reduction, which did not differ from the high contrast control condition. These results indicate that an abstract internal code is derived during the encoding of the probe stimulus from which the effects of stimulus quality have been removed. Thus, factors that interact with stimulus quality in memory scanning tasks can be assumed to have a locus within the encoding stage of processing.

[1]  Blake L. Wattenbarger,et al.  The effect of memory load on reaction time in character classification , 1972 .

[2]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[3]  B. Wattenbarger The Representation of the Stimulus in Character Classification , 1970 .

[4]  S. Sternberg Two operations in character recognition: Some evidence from reaction-time measurements , 1967 .

[5]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Encoding, stimulus-response compatibility, and stages of processing , 1977 .

[6]  John Theios,et al.  Reaction Time Measurements in the Study of Memory Processes: Theory and Data1 , 1973 .

[7]  S. Sternberg Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies , 1975 .

[8]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[9]  J. P. Cavanagh Relation between the immediate memory span and the memory search rate. , 1972 .

[10]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Locus of the stimulus probability effect , 1973 .

[11]  Gerald W. Bracey Two operations In character recognition: A partial replication , 1969 .

[12]  R G Pachella,et al.  Encoding processes in memory scanning tasks , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Gary Thorson,et al.  Temporal changes in visual and acoustic codes in a letter-matching task , 1976 .

[14]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[15]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  Binary-classification reaction time: A review of some studies of human information-processing capabilities. , 1972 .

[16]  J. Theios,et al.  Memory scanning as a serial self-terminating process , 1973 .