Single‐Column Model Simulations of Subtropical Marine Boundary‐Layer Cloud Transitions Under Weakening Inversions

Results are presented of the GASS/EUCLIPSE single‐column model intercomparison study on the subtropical marine low‐level cloud transition. A central goal is to establish the performance of state‐of‐the‐art boundary‐layer schemes for weather and climate models for this cloud regime, using large‐eddy simulations of the same scenes as a reference. A novelty is that the comparison covers four different cases instead of one, in order to broaden the covered parameter space. Three cases are situated in the North‐Eastern Pacific, while one reflects conditions in the North‐Eastern Atlantic. A set of variables is considered that reflects key aspects of the transition process, making use of simple metrics to establish the model performance. Using this method, some longstanding problems in low‐level cloud representation are identified. Considerable spread exists among models concerning the cloud amount, its vertical structure, and the associated impact on radiative transfer. The sign and amplitude of these biases differ somewhat per case, depending on how far the transition has progressed. After cloud breakup the ensemble median exhibits the well‐known “too few too bright” problem. The boundary‐layer deepening rate and its state of decoupling are both underestimated, while the representation of the thin capping cloud layer appears complicated by a lack of vertical resolution. Encouragingly, some models are successful in representing the full set of variables, in particular, the vertical structure and diurnal cycle of the cloud layer in transition. An intriguing result is that the median of the model ensemble performs best, inspiring a new approach in subgrid parameterization.

[1]  Mohamed Zerroukat,et al.  The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations , 2011, Geoscientific Model Development.

[2]  Lisa Bengtsson,et al.  The HARMONIE-AROME Model Configuration in the ALADIN-HIRLAM NWP System , 2017 .

[3]  S. Bony,et al.  Coupling between lower‐tropospheric convective mixing and low‐level clouds: Physical mechanisms and dependence on convection scheme , 2016, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[4]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of EUCLIPSE–GASS Lagrangian Stratocumulus-to-Cumulus Transitions: Mean State, Turbulence, and Decoupling , 2016 .

[5]  B. Stevens,et al.  The role of precipitation and spatial organization in the response of trade‐wind clouds to warming , 2016 .

[6]  S. Bony,et al.  Shallowness of tropical low clouds as a predictor of climate models’ response to warming , 2016, Climate Dynamics.

[7]  R. Neggers Exploring bin‐macrophysics models for moist convective transport and clouds , 2015 .

[8]  R. Neggers Attributing the behavior of low‐level clouds in large‐scale models to subgrid‐scale parameterizations , 2015 .

[9]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  A single‐column model intercomparison on the stratocumulus representation in present‐day and future climate , 2015 .

[10]  I. Sandu,et al.  The behavior of trade‐wind cloudiness in observations and models: The major cloud components and their variability , 2015 .

[11]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Improving Subtropical Boundary Layer Cloudiness in the 2011 NCEP GFS , 2014 .

[12]  D. Roode,et al.  Factors controlling rapid stratocumulus cloud thinning , 2014 .

[13]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  CGILS: Results from the first phase of an international project to understand the physical mechanisms of low cloud feedbacks in single column models , 2013 .

[14]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  The GASS/EUCLIPSE model intercomparison of the stratocumulus transition as observed during ASTEX: LES results , 2013 .

[15]  B. Stevens,et al.  Atmospheric component of the MPI‐M Earth System Model: ECHAM6 , 2013 .

[16]  S. Bony,et al.  LMDZ5B: the atmospheric component of the IPSL climate model with revisited parameterizations for clouds and convection , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[17]  S. Bony,et al.  The ‘too few, too bright’ tropical low‐cloud problem in CMIP5 models , 2012 .

[18]  Chien‐Ming Wu,et al.  A treatment for the stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition in GCMs , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[19]  Eric Bazile,et al.  The Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE) scheme in the NWP models at Météo-France , 2012 .

[20]  H. Kawai Examples of Mechanisms for Negative Cloud Feedback of Stratocumulus and Stratus in Cloud Parameterizations , 2012 .

[21]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  PDF Parameterization of Boundary Layer Clouds in Models with Horizontal Grid Spacings from 2 to 16 km , 2012 .

[22]  Klaus Wyser,et al.  EC-Earth V2.2: description and validation of a new seamless earth system prediction model , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[23]  João Paulo Ramos Teixeira,et al.  Tropical and Subtropical Cloud Transitions in Weather and Climate Prediction Models: The GCSS/WGNE Pacific Cross-Section Intercomparison (GPCI) , 2011 .

[24]  C. Jones,et al.  The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model climate configurations , 2011 .

[25]  B. Stevens,et al.  On the Factors Modulating the Stratocumulus to Cumulus Transitions , 2011 .

[26]  Adam A. Scaife,et al.  Geoscientific Model Development The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 3 . 0 / 3 . 1 and JULES Global Land 3 . 0 / 3 . 1 configurations , 2011 .

[27]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Formulation of the Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation (DALES) and overview of its applications , 2010 .

[28]  Thorsten Mauritsen,et al.  Performance of an Eddy Diffusivity-Mass Flux Scheme for Shallow Cumulus Boundary Layers , 2010 .

[29]  B. Stevens,et al.  On the transitions in marine boundary layer cloudiness , 2009 .

[30]  M. Köhler,et al.  A Dual Mass Flux Framework for Boundary Layer Convection. Part I: Transport , 2009 .

[31]  R. Neggers A Dual Mass Flux Framework for Boundary Layer Convection. Part II: Clouds , 2009 .

[32]  Sylvie Malardel,et al.  A Parameterization of Dry Thermals and Shallow Cumuli for Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction , 2009 .

[33]  A. Lock Factors influencing cloud area at the capping inversion for shallow cumulus clouds , 2009 .

[34]  Akio Arakawa,et al.  Parameterization of PBL Processes in an Atmospheric General Circulation Model: Description and Preliminary Assessment , 2009 .

[35]  J. Kindle,et al.  Summary diagrams for coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem model skill assessment , 2009 .

[36]  A. SEIFERTNovember Understanding macrophysical outcomes of microphysical choices in simulations of shallow cumulus convection , 2008 .

[37]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[38]  Sungsu Park,et al.  A single-column model intercomparison of a heavily drizzling stratocumulus-topped boundary layer , 2007 .

[39]  B. Shipway,et al.  A comparison of cloud‐resolving model simulations of trade wind cumulus with aircraft observations taken during RICO , 2007 .

[40]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  A Combined Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux Approach for the Convective Boundary Layer , 2007 .

[41]  S. Bony,et al.  The LMDZ4 general circulation model: climate performance and sensitivity to parametrized physics with emphasis on tropical convection , 2006 .

[42]  A. Pier Siebesma,et al.  A Simple Parameterization for Detrainment in Shallow Cumulus , 2006 .

[43]  Toshiro Inoue,et al.  A Simple Parameterization Scheme for Subtropical Marine Stratocumulus , 2006 .

[44]  Kuan-Man Xu,et al.  Simulation of shallow cumuli and their transition to deep convective clouds by cloud‐resolving models with different third‐order turbulence closures , 2006 .

[45]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Intercomparison and interpretation of single-column model simulations of a nocturnal stratocumulus-topped marine boundary layer , 2005 .

[46]  J. Curry,et al.  A New Double-Moment Microphysics Parameterization for Application in Cloud and Climate Models. Part I: Description , 2005 .

[47]  Susanne Crewell,et al.  Comparison of model predicted liquid water path with ground-based measurements during CLIWA-NET , 2005 .

[48]  Sungsu Park,et al.  A new heuristic Lagrangian marine boundary layer cloud model , 2004 .

[49]  Roel Neggers,et al.  An Evaluation of Mass Flux Closures for Diurnal Cycles of Shallow Cumulus , 2004 .

[50]  Martin Köhler,et al.  Observations and numerical simulations of the diurnal cycle of the EUROCS stratocumulus case , 2004 .

[51]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Cloud representation in general‐circulation models over the northern Pacific Ocean: A EUROCS intercomparison study , 2004 .

[52]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  An updated length‐scale formulation for turbulent mixing in clear and cloudy boundary layers , 2004 .

[53]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Boundary Layer Depth, Entrainment, and Decoupling in the Cloud-Capped Subtropical and Tropical Marine Boundary Layer , 2004 .

[54]  Christopher S. Bretherton,et al.  A New Parameterization for Shallow Cumulus Convection and Its Application to Marine Subtropical Cloud-Topped Boundary Layers. Part I: Description and 1D Results , 2004 .

[55]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  A Large Eddy Simulation Intercomparison Study of Shallow Cumulus Convection , 2003 .

[56]  D. Lilly,et al.  Dynamics and chemistry of marine stratocumulus - DYCOMS II , 2003 .

[57]  J. Curry,et al.  Confronting Models with Data: The Gewex Cloud Systems Study , 2003 .

[58]  D. Randall,et al.  Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: Model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities , 2003 .

[59]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Effects of Domain Size and Numerical Resolution on the Simulation of Shallow Cumulus Convection , 2002 .

[60]  Robert Wood,et al.  Diurnal cycle of liquid water path over the subtropical and tropical oceans , 2002 .

[61]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[62]  S. Bony,et al.  Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models , 2001 .

[63]  K.,et al.  Simulations of Trade Wind Cumuli under a Strong Inversion , 2001 .

[64]  K. Taylor Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[65]  B. Stevens,et al.  Observations, experiments, and large eddy simulation , 2001 .

[66]  Steven K. Krueger,et al.  SUMMARY OF PROGRESS AND MAIN ACTIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE NINTH MEETING OF THE GEWEX CLOUD SYSTEM STUDY ( GCSS , 2001 .

[67]  J. Redelsperger,et al.  A turbulence scheme allowing for mesoscale and large‐eddy simulations , 2000 .

[68]  C. Bretherton,et al.  A GCSS Boundary-Layer Cloud Model Intercomparison Study Of The First Astex Lagrangian Experiment , 1999 .

[69]  B. Stevens,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Radiatively Driven Convection: Sensitivities to the Representation of Small Scales , 1999 .

[70]  J. Norris Low Cloud Type over the Ocean from Surface Observations. Part II: Geographical and Seasonal Variations , 1998 .

[71]  P. Duynkerke,et al.  Observed Lagrangian transition of stratocumulus into cumulus during ASTEX : Mean state and turbulence structure , 1997 .

[72]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Moisture Transport, Lower-Tropospheric Stability, and Decoupling of Cloud-Topped Boundary Layers , 1997 .

[73]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Cloudiness and Marine Boundary Layer Dynamics in the ASTEX Lagrangian Experiments. Part I: Synoptic Setting and Vertical Structure , 1995 .

[74]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Cloudiness and Marine Boundary Layer Dynamics in the ASTEX Lagrangian Experiments. Part II: Cloudiness, Drizzle, Surface Fluxes, and Entrainment , 1995 .

[75]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment - ASTEX , 1995 .

[76]  G. Shutts,et al.  A numerical modelling study of the geostrophic adjustment process following deep convection , 1994 .

[77]  S. Klein,et al.  The Seasonal Cycle of Low Stratiform Clouds , 1993 .

[78]  W. Schubert,et al.  Stability of cloud-topped boundary layers , 1988 .

[79]  Graeme L. Stephens,et al.  Radiation Profiles in Extended Water Clouds. II: Parameterization Schemes , 1978 .

[80]  C. Leith Theoretical Skill of Monte Carlo Forecasts , 1974 .

[81]  E. Epstein,et al.  Stochastic dynamic prediction , 1969 .

[82]  E. Epstein,et al.  Stochastic dynamic prediction1 , 1969 .

[83]  H. Riehl,et al.  The north‐east trade of the Pacific Ocean , 1951 .