The Effects of Interruptions on Remembering Task Information

Interruptions can cause us to take longer to complete our tasks and lower the quality of the results. Yet, we are interrupted frequently in our daily lives by other people, by ourselves, and by our computers. We may not be able to control some of these interruptions, but it should be possible to create computer interfaces that control the interruptions. Two methods are examined in this paper. The first method is to allow the user to postpone the secondary task (the interruption). The second method is to allow the user to take a note about the current task before moving on to the interruption. In the first experiment, subjects had the choice to postpone or not and in the high cognitive workload task, 83% chose to postpone. In the second experiment, memory for details of the task was examined when the user postponed the secondary task and when they did not. There were no significant differences between the two conditions. In the final experiment, some subjects could take a note about the primary task. Counter intuitively, the subjects who could not take a note performed better on the task, but not significantly.

[1]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  A method, system, and tools for intelligent interruption management , 2005, TAMODIA '05.

[2]  T. Ramayah,et al.  The Adoption of Mobile Commerce Service among Employed Mobile Phone Users in Bangladesh: Self-efficacy as a Moderator , 2011 .

[3]  B. Zeigarnik On finished and unfinished tasks. , 1938 .

[4]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Multitasking and monotasking: the effects of mental workload on deferred task interruptions , 2010, CHI.

[5]  Kara A. Latorella,et al.  The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in Human-Computer Interaction Design , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Carlos Fernando Estrada Aligning Information Technology Within The Framework Of Corporate Governance To Increase Corporate Value In Mexico , 2011, BIOINFORMATICS 2011.

[7]  N. J. Schweitzer,et al.  The CSI Effect: Popular Fiction About Forensic Science Affects Public Expectations About Real Forensic Science , 2007 .

[8]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[9]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Task Interruption: Resumption Lag and the Role of Cues , 2004 .

[10]  G. Barak,et al.  A Study of Juror Expectations and Demands Concerning Scientific Evidence: Does the 'CSI Effect' Exist? , 2006 .

[11]  Cynthia K. Riemenschneider,et al.  What small business executives have learned about managing information technology , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[12]  I. Sommers,et al.  Crime-Show-Viewing Habits and Public Attitudes Toward Forensic Evidence: The “CSI Effect” Revisited , 2010, Justice System Journal.

[13]  G. R. Thomas North Carolina Law Enforcement Officers' Perceptions Regarding the CSI Effect , 2008 .

[14]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Self-interruption on the computer: a typology of discretionary task interleaving , 2009, CHI.

[15]  Víctor M. González,et al.  "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres , 2004, CHI.

[16]  Thomas Andre,et al.  Using a computer simulation before dissection to help students learn anatomy , 2000 .

[17]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[18]  Robert DeLine,et al.  Evaluating cues for resuming interrupted programming tasks , 2010, CHI.

[19]  Deborah E. Doty,et al.  Interactive CD-ROM Storybooks and Young Readers’ Reading Comprehension , 2001 .

[20]  Johannes van Biesebroeck,et al.  Firm Size Matters: Growth and Productivity Growth in African Manufacturing , 2005, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[21]  Víctor M. González,et al.  No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work , 2005, CHI.

[22]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 2000, MIS Q..

[23]  Indrit Troshani,et al.  Organizational Adoption of XBRL , 2007, Electron. Mark..

[24]  David C. Yen,et al.  Awareness and challenges of Internet security , 2000, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[25]  Karen L. Paullet,et al.  DOES THE TECHNOLOGY PORTRAYED IN TELEVISION CRIME SHOWS HAVE AN EFFECT ON POTENTIAL JURORS , 2010 .

[26]  Jeffrey Heinrick,et al.  Everyone's an Expert: The CSI Effect's Negative Impact on Juries , 2006 .

[27]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Implications of Information Technology Infrastructure for Business Process Redesign , 1999, MIS Q..

[29]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  Supporting the information technology champion , 1991 .

[30]  Donald E. Shelton,et al.  The 'CSI Effect': Does it Really Exist? , 2008 .

[31]  Indranil R. Bardhan,et al.  Prioritizing a Portfolio of Information Technology Investment Projects , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[33]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .