Semantic Representation and Correspondence for State-Based Motion Transition

Consistent transition algorithms preserve salient source motion features by establishing feature-based correspondence between motions and accordingly warping them before interpolation. These processes are commonly dubbed as preprocessing in motion transition literature. Current transition methods suffer from a lack of economical and generic preprocessing algorithms. Classical computer vision methods for human motion classification and correspondence are too computationally intensive for computer animation. The paper proposes an analytical framework that combines low-level kinematics analysis and high-level knowledge-based analysis to create states that provide coherent snapshots of body-parts active during the motion. These states are then corresponded via a globally optimal search tree algorithm. The framework proposed here is intuitive, controllable, and delivers results in near realtime. The validity and performance of the proposed system are tangibly proven with extensive experiments.

[1]  Aaron Hertzmann,et al.  Style machines , 2000, SIGGRAPH 2000.

[2]  Michael F. Cohen,et al.  Efficient generation of motion transitions using spacetime constraints , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[3]  Lance Williams,et al.  Motion signal processing , 1995, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  Jake K. Aggarwal,et al.  Human Motion Analysis: A Review , 1999, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[5]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Separating Style and Content with Bilinear Models , 2000, Neural Computation.

[6]  Michael F. Cohen,et al.  Verbs and Adverbs: Multidimensional Motion Interpolation , 1998, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[7]  Shang Guo,et al.  A high-level control mechanism for human locomotion based on parametric frame space interpolation , 1996 .

[8]  Michael Gleicher,et al.  Constraint-based motion adaptation , 1998, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[9]  Golam Ashraf,et al.  Constrained framespace interpolation , 2001, Proceedings Computer Animation 2001. Fourteenth Conference on Computer Animation (Cat. No.01TH8596).

[10]  Ken Perlin,et al.  Real Time Responsive Animation with Personality , 1995, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[11]  Golam Ashraf,et al.  Generating Consistent Motion Transition via Decoupled Framespace Interpolation , 2000, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[12]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Motion Abstraction and Mapping with Spatial Constraints , 1998, CAPTECH.

[13]  W SederbergThomas,et al.  A physically based approach to 2D shape blending , 1992 .

[14]  Yongping Luo Handling Motion Processing Constraints for Articulated Figure Animation , 1997 .

[15]  Hwan-Gue Cho,et al.  An efficient control over human running animation with extension of planar hopper model , 1998, Proceedings Pacific Graphics '98. Sixth Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications (Cat. No.98EX208).

[16]  Aaron F. Bobick,et al.  Parametric Hidden Markov Models for Gesture Recognition , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Tracking and modifying human motion with dynamic simulation , 1999, SIGGRAPH '99.

[18]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Tracking and Modifying Upper-body Human Motion Data with Dynamic Simulation , 1999, Computer Animation and Simulation.

[19]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Human free-walking model for a real-time interactive design of gaits , 1990 .

[20]  Thomas W. Sederberg,et al.  A physically based approach to 2–D shape blending , 1992, SIGGRAPH.

[21]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Automating gait generation , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[22]  Peter L. Williams,et al.  Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Medicine and Surgery , 1996 .

[23]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[24]  Roberto Maiocchi,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Approach to the Synthesis of Human Motion , 1991, Modeling in Computer Graphics.