Digging Soil Experiments for Micro Hydraulic Excavators based on Model Predictive Tracking Control

Recently, the increase of burden to operators and lack of skilled operators are the issue in the work of the hydraulic excavator. These problems are expected to be improved by autonomous control. In this paper, we present experimental results of hydraulic excavators using model predictive control (MPC) which incorporates servo mechanism. MPC optimizes digging operations by the optimal control input which is calculated by predicting the future states and satisfying the constraints. However, it is difficult for MPC to cope with the reaction force from soil when a hydraulic excavator performs excavation. Servo mechanism suppresses the influence of the constant disturbance using the error integration. However, the bucket tip deviates from a specified shape by the sudden change of the disturbance. We can expect that the tracking performance is improved by combining MPC and servo mechanism. Path-tracking controls of the bucket tip are performed using the optimal control input. We apply the proposed method to the Komatsu- made micro hydraulic excavator PC01 by experiments. We show the effectiveness of the proposed method through the experiment of digging soil by comparing servo mechanism and pure MPC with the proposed method.

[1]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  CVXGEN: a code generator for embedded convex optimization , 2011, Optimization and Engineering.

[2]  Kazuma Sekiguchi,et al.  Path-following Control for Front-steering Vehicles Based on Time-state Control Form Using Travel Distance as a Virtual Time-axis:—Applying to Model Predictive Parking Control— , 2014 .

[3]  Daisuke Chugo,et al.  The Analysis of Excavator Operation by Skillful Operator , 2006 .

[4]  Kazuma Sekiguchi,et al.  Model predictive trajectory tracking control for hydraulic excavator on digging operation , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA).

[5]  Soon-Yong Yang,et al.  Study on the architecture of the remote control system for hydraulic excavator , 2011, 2011 11th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems.

[6]  Min-Sung Kang,et al.  Development of remote controlled manipulation device for a conventional excavator without renovation , 2012, 2012 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII).

[7]  D.C. Rye,et al.  Robotic excavator swing control using fuzzy rotating sliding mode , 2001, 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. (Cat. No.01CH37297).

[8]  Kazuma Sekiguchi,et al.  B209 Model Predictive Tracking Control with Digging Range Constraints for Excavators , 2015 .

[9]  H. Jin Kim,et al.  Trajectory generation for an automated excavator , 2014, 2014 14th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2014).

[10]  Ahn Kyoung Kwan,et al.  A study on an energy saving electro-hydraulic excavator , 2009, 2009 ICCAS-SICE.

[11]  Kazuo Fujishima,et al.  Digging control system for hydraulic excavator , 2001 .

[12]  Kyoung Kwan Ahn,et al.  Trajectory control of electro-hydraulic excavator using fuzzy self tuning algorithm with neural network , 2009 .

[13]  Tao Wang,et al.  An Energy-Saving Pressure-Compensated Hydraulic System With Electrical Approach , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[14]  Jeong-Ju Choi Development of a Miniaturized Automatic Excavator with Time-Varying Sliding Mode Controller , 2011 .

[15]  Tsunehiro Takeda,et al.  A Design Method of Linear Multi-Input-Output Optimal Tracking Systems , 1978 .

[16]  H. Jin Kim,et al.  Path tracking for a hydraulic excavator utilizing proportional-derivative and linear quadratic control , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA).