Impact of technical information in magic-based inspiration tools on novice designers

There is a growing concern for design students to gain basic technological knowledge for design in real practice. While there is abundance of tools for creativity, technical information has never been implemented as inspiration for ideas. In this paper, to answer the demand of creativity tools with real practice, we created magic-based inspirational cards that contain technical clues of how each magic effect can be created in products. Two versions of the tools were compared: Magic cards (only illustration of magic effects) and Technical cards (illustration of magic effects with additional technical clues). The tools were evaluated with thirty novice designers in two design sessions. In the first session, they were asked to generate design ideas in a design task. Then a week later, they were divided into three groups, control group, Magic cards, and Technical cards. The experimental groups were asked to use the cards as a source of inspiration and to generate design ideas in the same design task. The ideas generated by the participants were assessed in terms of creativity and intended user experience (UX). The findings show that the use of both types of magic-based cards resulted in significantly higher scores in originality and flexibility of ideation. Also, the use of Technical cards led to significantly higher intended UX scores. The analysis of products’ behaviors (outputs) showed a significant increase of physical outputs when magic-based inspiration is provided. Our study suggested that, for novice design students, the Magic Effects set together with technological clues could enhance creativity in ideation.

[1]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  Assessing the impact of educational differences in HCI design practice , 2014 .

[2]  Matti Perttula,et al.  The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation , 2007 .

[3]  Sorin Adam Matei,et al.  Enhancing human–computer interaction design education: teaching affordance design for emerging mobile devices , 2010 .

[4]  Luis A. Vasconcelos,et al.  Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges , 2016 .

[5]  L. Anolli,et al.  Accessing Source Information in Analogical Problem-Solving , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[7]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Evidence-based design heuristics for idea generation , 2016 .

[8]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[9]  Bruce Tog Tognazzini,et al.  Principles, techniques, and ethics of stage magic and their application to human interface design , 1993, INTERCHI.

[10]  Marc J. de Vries,et al.  The developing field of technology education: a review to look forward , 2013 .

[11]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Designing with Cards , 2016, Collaboration in Creative Design.

[12]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[13]  Ruth Mugge,et al.  A new strategy to reduce design fixation: Presenting partial photographs to designers , 2014 .

[14]  Gerald G. Udell,et al.  Creativity: Necessary, But Not Sufficient* , 1976 .

[15]  Sam de Jongh Hepworth,et al.  Magical experiences in interaction design , 2007, DPPI.

[16]  Jim Clack.  Distinguishing between ‘macro’ and ‘micro’ possibility thinking: Seen and unseen creativity , 2017 .

[17]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[18]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  Creativity in Design Engineering and the Role of Knowledge: Modelling the Expert , 2005 .

[19]  P. John Williams,et al.  Research in technology education: looking back to move forward , 2013 .

[20]  S. Martinez-Conde,et al.  Attention and awareness in stage magic: turning tricks into research , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance , 2006 .

[22]  Sisi Liu.  Broaden the mind before ideation: The effect of conceptual attention scope on creativity , 2016 .

[23]  Magic in Theory , 1999 .

[24]  Eugene Subbotsky,et al.  Magical thinking : reality or illusion. , 2004 .

[25]  Dariel Fitzkee.  The Trick Brain , 1978 .

[26]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming , 2017 .

[27]  J. Stevens,et al.  Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 4th ed. , 2002 .

[28]  J. Stevens.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[29]  Philip Kortum,et al.  HCI Beyond the GUI: Design for Haptic, Speech, Olfactory, and Other Nontraditional Interfaces , 2008 .

[30]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Using creative exhaustion to foster idea generation , 2019 .

[31]  John S. Gero,et al.  Effects of examples on the results of a design activity , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[32]  Anna E. Pohlmeyer,et al.  Developing Usage Guidelines for a Card-Based Design Tool : A Case of the Positive Emotional Granularity Cards , 2016 .

[33]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  The PLEX Cards and its techniques as sources of inspiration when designing for playfulness , 2013, Int. J. Arts Technol..

[34]  Ángel Asensio,et al.  From the islands of knowledge to a shared understanding: interdisciplinarity and technology literacy for innovation in smart electronic product design , 2017 .

[35]  David H. Cropley,et al.  Recognizing and fostering creativity in technological design education , 2010 .

[36]  M. Barak,et al.  A model of flexible thinking in contemporary education , 2016 .

[37]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Inspiring design idea generation: insights from a memory-search perspective , 2010 .

[38]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Inspiring design ideas with texts , 2011 .

[39]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Fundamental studies in Design-by-Analogy: A focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems , 2014 .

[40]  Nathaniel Crilly,et al.  Fixation and creativity in concept development: the attitudes and practices of expert designers , 2015 .

[41]  Nicola Morelli,et al.  Product-service systems, a perspective shift for designers: A case study: the design of a telecentre , 2003 .

[42]  Miki Saijo,et al.  LEVERAGING CREATIVITY OF DESIGN STUDENTS WITH A MAGIC-BASED INSPIRATION TOOL , 2018 .

[43]  Manuel Pérez Cota,et al.  Efficient Measurement of the User Experience of Interactive Products. How to use the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ).Example: Spanish Language Version , 2013, Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell..

[44]  Eddie Norman,et al.  The Nature of Technology for Design , 1998 .

[45]  Timothy Merritt,et al.  Method Card Design Dimensions: A Survey of Card-Based Design Tools , 2013, INTERACT.

[46]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of Undergraduate Engineering Students , 2012 .

[47]  Améziane Aoussat,et al.  Improvement of the industrial design process by the creation and usage of intermediate representations of technology, "TechCards" , 2011, DPPI.

[48]  Ann Light,et al.  Designing Connected Products: UX for the Consumer Internet of Things , 2015 .

[49]  Gail M. Sullivan,et al.  Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. , 2012, Journal of graduate medical education.

[50]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[51]  Majken Kirkegaard Rasmussen,et al.  "It's alive, it's magic, it's in love with you": opportunities, challenges and open questions for actuated interfaces , 2013, OZCHI.