Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome?

Objective: To determine whether an early increased-intensity upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improves outcome. Design: A randomized controlled trial. Setting: A stroke unit which provides acute care and rehabilitation for all stroke admissions. Subjects: One hundred and twenty-three patients who had had a stroke causing upper limb impairment within the previous 10 days. Intervention: The intervention group received stroke unit care plus enhanced upper limb rehabilitation provided jointly by a physiotherapist and occupational therapist, commencing within 10 days of stroke, and available up to 30 minutes/day, five days/week for six weeks. The control group received stroke unit care. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) three months after stroke. Secondary outcome measures: Motricity Index; Frenchay Arm Test; upper limb pain; Barthel ADL Index; Nottingham E-ADL Scale; and costs to health and social services at three and six months after stroke. Results: There were no differences in outcomes between the intervention and control groups three and six months after stroke. During the intervention period the intervention group received a median of 29 minutes of enhanced upper limb therapy per working day as inpatients. The total amount of inpatient physiotherapy and occupational therapy received by the intervention group was a median of 52 minutes per working day during the intervention period and 38 minutes per working day for the control group (p = 0.001). There were no differences in service costs. Conclusions: An early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme jointly provided by a physiotherapist and occupational therapist did not improve outcome after stroke. The actual difference in the amount of therapy received by intervention and control groups was less than planned due to a competitive therapy bias.

[1]  H. Feys,et al.  Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[2]  B. Langhammer,et al.  Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[3]  B. Wilson,et al.  A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients. , 1990, International disability studies.

[4]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[5]  A Randomised Controlled Trial of Early Additional Physiotherapy for the Upper Limb after Stroke , 1998 .

[6]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[8]  J. Slattery,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1989, Stroke.

[9]  C Ballinger,et al.  Unpacking the black box of therapy – a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? , 1996, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[11]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[12]  R L Hewer,et al.  Assessment of recovery of arm control in hemiplegic stroke patients. 1. Arm function tests. , 1980, International rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  P. Friedman,et al.  Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. , 1990, International disability studies.

[14]  G. Demeurisse,et al.  Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. , 1980, European neurology.

[15]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[16]  T. Mulder,et al.  Pitfalls in effectiveness research: a comparative analysis of treatment goals and outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[17]  A. Ashburn.  Stroke Units An evidence-based approach , 2000 .

[18]  I. Hsueh,et al.  Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. , 1998, Age and ageing.

[19]  P. Pohl,et al.  Therapeutic interventions to improve upper extremity recovery and function. , 1999, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[20]  A. Dromerick,et al.  Does the Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Acute Rehabilitation Reduce Arm Impairment After Ischemic Stroke? , 2000, Stroke.

[21]  D. Wade,et al.  Recovery after stroke , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  J. Bamford,et al.  Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction , 1991, The Lancet.

[23]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[24]  H. Schouten,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1988, Stroke.

[25]  William A. Stock,et al.  Research Synthesis , 1996 .

[26]  A. Sunderland,et al.  Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. , 1987, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[27]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. , 1997, Stroke.

[28]  H. Hodkinson.  Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. , 1972, Age and ageing.

[29]  J. Marler,et al.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. , 1989, Stroke.

[30]  R. Lyle.  A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[31]  Lalit Kalra,et al.  Improving Stroke Rehabilitation: A Controlled Study , 1993, Stroke.

[32]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[33]  P. Duncan.  Synthesis of Intervention Trials To Improve Motor Recovery following Stroke. , 1997, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[34]  Helen Rodgers,et al.  British Association of Stroke Physicians: benchmarking survey of stroke services. , 2003, Age and ageing.

[35]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[36]  F. Nouri,et al.  An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients , 1987 .

[37]  D. Wade,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[38]  B. Bobath.  Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment , 1978 .