Physiological responses of New World monkey V1 neurons to stimuli defined by coherent motion.

We studied the responses of neurons in area V1 of marmosets to visual stimuli that moved against dynamic textured backgrounds. The stimuli were defined either by a first-order cue ('solid' bars, which were either darker or lighter than the background) or by a second-order cue ('camouflaged' bars, defined only by coherent motion). Forty-two per cent of the neurons demonstrated a similar selectivity for the direction of motion of the solid and camouflaged bars, thereby characterizing a population of cue-invariant (CI) cells. The other cells either showed different selectivity to the movement of solid and camouflaged bars (non-cue-invariant, or NCI cells), or responded equally well to movement in all directions. CI neurons, which were rare in layer 4, tended to have larger receptive fields and to be more strongly direction selective than NCI cells. Although V1 neurons tended to show maximal responses to camouflaged bars that were longer than the 'optimal' solid bars, many CI neurons preferred first- and second-order stimuli of similar lengths. Finally, the activity evoked by the camouflaged bars was delayed in relation to that evoked by solid bars. These results demonstrate that motion CI responses are relatively common in primate V1, especially among a population of strongly direction-selective neurons. They also indicate that this response property may depend on feedback from extrastriate areas, or on complex intrinsic interactions within V1.

[1]  G. Elston,et al.  The second visual area in the marmoset monkey: Visuotopic organisation, magnification factors, architectonical boundaries, and modularity , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  C. Hung,et al.  Real and illusory contour processing in area V1 of the primate: a cortical balancing act. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  G. Orban,et al.  Processing of kinetically defined boundaries in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  L. P. O'Keefe,et al.  Processing of first- and second-order motion signals by neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[5]  V. Bringuier,et al.  Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons. , 1999, Science.

[6]  Responses of cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate complex of the cat to textured visual stimuli , 1976, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  L. Schmued A rapid, sensitive histochemical stain for myelin in frozen brain sections. , 1990, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[8]  C. Casanova,et al.  Comparison of the responses to moving texture patterns of simple and complex cells in the cat's area 17. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  B. B. Lee,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells and photoreceptors in the retina of a New World monkey: The marmoset Callithrix jacchus , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Neural correlates of boundary perception , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Baker,et al.  Temporal and spatial response to second-order stimuli in cat area 18. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  W. B. Spatz,et al.  Morphology and connections of neurons in area 17 projecting to the extrastriate areas mt and 19DM and to the superior colliculus in the monkey Callithrix jacchus , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  R. Hassler Comparative Anatomy of the Central Visual Systems in Day- and Night-active Primates , 1966 .

[14]  J M Zanker Second-order motion perception in the peripheral visual field. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  P. Hammond,et al.  Directional and orientational tuning of feline striate cortical neurones: Correlation with neuronal class , 1989, Vision Research.

[16]  J J Knierim,et al.  Neural responses to visual texture patterns in middle temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  G. Orban,et al.  Cue-invariant shape selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. , 1993, Science.

[19]  G. Orban,et al.  Processing of kinetically defined boundaries in the cortical motion area MT of the macaque monkey. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  C. Gilbert Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  D. Mackay,et al.  Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  J. Bullier,et al.  Feedforward and feedback connections between areas V1 and V2 of the monkey have similar rapid conduction velocities. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  P. Hammond,et al.  Relationship between cortical lamination and texture sensitivity in complex neurones of the striate cortex in cats , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  R. Shapley,et al.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: Correlates of “popout” under anesthesia , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  M G Rosa,et al.  Visual areas in the dorsal and medial extrastriate cortices of the marmoset , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  Vivien A. Casagrande,et al.  The Afferent, Intrinsic, and Efferent Connections of Primary Visual Cortex in Primates , 1994 .

[29]  J. M. Hupé,et al.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.

[30]  C. Baker Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  P Girard,et al.  Feedback connections act on the early part of the responses in monkey visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys , 1995, Neuron.

[33]  T. Albright,et al.  Neuronal responses to edges defined by luminance vs. temporal texture in macaque area V1 , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[34]  M G Rosa,et al.  Visuotopic organisation of striate cortex in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus) , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[35]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Visual cortical mechanisms of perceptual grouping: interacting layers, networks, columns, and maps , 2000, Neural Networks.

[37]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness , 2001, Science.

[38]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual response latencies in striate cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  P. Hammond On the response of simple and complex cells to random dot patterns: a reply to skottun, grosof and de valois , 1991, Vision Research.

[40]  G Westheimer,et al.  Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  O. D. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Neuronal responses to borders with and without luminance gradients in cat visual cortex and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[43]  G. Orban,et al.  Response latency of macaque area MT/V5 neurons and its relationship to stimulus parameters. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Jean Bullier,et al.  The Timing of Information Transfer in the Visual System , 1997 .

[45]  S. Molotchnikoff,et al.  Cellular response to texture and form defined by motion in area 19 of the cat , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[46]  B. Richmond,et al.  Latency: another potential code for feature binding in striate cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  D Regan,et al.  Form from motion parallax and form from luminance contrast: vernier discrimination. , 1986, Spatial vision.

[49]  J. Bullier,et al.  Response modulations by static texture surround in area V1 of the macaque monkey do not depend on feedback connections from V2. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  D. Snodderly,et al.  Organization of striate cortex of alert, trained monkeys (Macaca fascicularis): ongoing activity, stimulus selectivity, and widths of receptive field activating regions. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  T D Albright,et al.  Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. , 1992, Science.

[52]  W. Levick Variation in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1973, Vision research.

[53]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.